Are UFOs real and if so which are the best UFO videos? The world is fascinated with Aliens, UFOs, space, astronomy, astrology etc. UFO Sightings Footage is going full steam ahead and bringing you the very latest UFO sightings footage and Alien sightings footage
A Canadian witness at Ontario reported videotaping a low flying military airplane making unusual moves in a report where a still image taken at the same time shows a disc-shaped object near the plane, according to testimony in Case #58504 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
Here is an image from the MUFON archives submitted by eye witnesses showing "probably" for the first time in clarity and near high definition.
In Ufology terms this image would be considered the highest of definition, believe me.
One of the witnesses snapped this still image which shows the military plane and a disc-shaped object in tow. What does this actually mean, does the airforce know about it...
Is the military aware of the UFO following them.
Is the military conducting an experiment "with" the UFO.
Do they know about the cameraman on the ground photographing away.
There's lots of questions here in this post which we are trying to answer, we would like to answer all the questions in Ufology but we'll settle with one bit at a time - slowly, slowly wins the day.
One of the witnesses snapped this still image which shows the military plane and a disc-shaped Unidentified Flying Object just below the plane.
The event occurred about 3:30 p.m. on July 29th, 2014 when the witness was outside with friends.
Canadian MUFON Field Investigator Bob Mitchell investigated and closed the case as an Unknown (link to his Openminds profile is below).
"No description of the object was provided except a video which absolutely shows nothing at all, just a plane and no UFO and a still photo, Mitchell wrote in his report"
The video was too small for this Field Investigator to see any object but the military plane. This is also our (UFO Sightings Footage) findings also as the video is totally irrelevant and adds absolutely nothing.
You need to understand though that the video supplied by the eye witness was "only" so the people at MUFON could get an understanding of how big the plane was.
There's no UFO in the video supplied by the eye witness - please remember that when checking out the video. There's only UFOs in the photographs.
Cropped and enlarged portion of the eye witness image which was submitted showing only the disc-shaped object - clearly not a natural object.
Upon speaking with the witness, it was learned that the video was simply provided to show the strange maneuvers of the plane.
The object wasn’t actually visible in the video, people are not happy about that, which is obvious by the remarks on YouTube in the comments section.
So we will provide a link to the video which is a MUFON video hosted on YouTube (below). Then there was a silver, disc-shaped object visible in the photograph.
In our interview, the witness said the object didn’t make any sound and didn’t appear to have any wings, lights or propulsion.
It was a massive, chrome-reflective "giant flying saucer" that was the size of two, four-store houses.
According to the witness, the military aircraft was the size of a city block, a massive plane.
He believes the object was about half the size of the military plane.
The object also appeared to be flying sporadically.
The witness said the friend that thought he had seen the object with his naked eye described it as "fired out of the sky like nothing else" until it disappeared.
The witness and his friends believe the strange craft was also reflecting light because it was very hard to see with the naked eye.
They believe the photograph just happened to capture it under the right light conditions."
Amazing video which is showing us two black UFOs coming together and this is from declassified Soviet era materials. Narrated by Sir roger Moore it's called UFOs - Russian Connection. The two black UFOs have been considered by many experts (as featured in the documentary) as to be the real deal. This is the real deal in my opinion and the UFO documentary is awesome.
Back then in the Soviet era times, there really wasn't any sophisticated or good enough to pass any scrutiny in today's world of "computer software generated graphics" especially this good, it would stand out as bad graphics, right.
UFO renderings where absolutely rubbish in the time period of the Cold War, there "was green screen special effects - but it was actually blue screens" that they used. Here is a few questions I have about this UFO video:
How was the Soviet plane able to get so close to the two UFOs.
How did the classified UFO video become declassified.
I've focussed on only one UFO event from the documentary.
But there's lots mentioned of UFO incidents in the documentary.
Green screens were invented way back in 1940 "would you believe it" by Larry Butler who then went on to win an Academy Award for his special effects in the famous movie called "The Thief of Baghdad".
The camera's way back in the Soviet era was not high definition enough back then (or so we were led to believe) and so this doesn't look like it was faked at all to me.
The video is part of a documentary which is narrated by Sir Roger Moore who became famous by playing the legendary MI5 London based spy code named 007.
The Ufology and conspiracy theory documentary called UFOs: Russian Connection, is considered one of the most credible documentaries on the complex and mysterious Ufology genre of the old Iron Curtain.
If this turns out to be two real UFOs coming together as one UFO and a real video, then what now:
Where does the evidence go to that is gathered.
What is done with this evidence?
Who takes over the reins now.
Who is contacted and told of the news if anyone?
It's frustrating because lots of UFO sightings are been ruled as real, but then what...
Lets just imagine for a second, with the inevitable evolution of technology and how fast the world moves, there's no telling where this technology is right now? There's really no telling if the technology is on other planets by now and that's for real.
This is mind blowing if we're looking at top secret technology. Because we're looking at a video of two black UFOs might have all the answers to Ufology.
The two black UFOs are shown at 1:25 seconds in this particular trailer of the UFO documentary video:
UFOS: CONEXÃO RUSSA - YouTube
I'll leave you with conundrum for now, if a UFO turns out to be a real one and the evidence all points to it been real - then what? I've looked it up as best as I could in all the places I know to look it up and there's nothing!
This is by far the best UFO video we've ever seen here at UFO Sightings Footage as this meets all the criteria and then some. It's been extensively researched and a team of scientists and researchers all came together to analyse and figure this UFO sighting out.
They got the answers that the Department for Homeland Security (DHS) probably didn't want anyone knowing about this UFO incident and that, this is real.
Everyone and their uncles will have an opinion on UFO video this but the fact of the matter is this:
Experts with backgrounds in science have come together to analyze this.
When this UFO incident happened it caused quite a stir on the base.
MUFON brought a team of skeptical researchers (think tank) together to investigate this.
SCU (the think tank) investigated this and released a 161 page paper on their findings.
You will be delighted in the facts, evidence, proof plus their findings in this "eye opener" of a published "documented UFO incident for history" paper.
SCU is amazing because it is a "think tank" made up of former military officers, and law enforcement personnel with technical experience and backgrounds in investigation plus scientists.
I believe that this UFO case is for the people of Earth - but with a focus on the people who really care about the truth and why the truth isn't reaching the people of Earth?
There's a case for taking this to the mainstream media but would they have any interest in this?
Would the mainstream media outlets even want to show this UFO on prime time TV, you can guarantee the answer is no!
Those people with a genuine interest and a good understanding of Ufology are trying their best to bring the knowledge of life in the stars out from the dark and into the light.
The link to that paper can be found here and guys, it is very revealing and very accurate with it's information and how it's presented, with all things taken into account.
This is a little known UFO case (in the UK) which was seen and then chased in a military plane by it's pilot, co pilot and obvious cameraman and they keep the Unidentified Flying Object in the middle of the frame as much as they can.
All the while the pilot and copilot plus "the camera operator" must seemingly achieve the impossible and film the UFO but in night vision.
Here is the military planes night vision video, giving chase to the UFO:
2013 Aguadilla Puerto Rico UAP/USO - YouTube
The UFO is travelling very fast and the military plane struggles to keep up with this Unidentified Flying Object.
This immediately got my attention as it's got it all, as far as amateur researching UFOs goes.
The leaked video is great, you should share it to show people UFOs are very real. So, what happens now? It's all fine and well investigating a UFO sighting and finding it to be real, but then what?
What happens after that...
Let us know in the comments what should happen next, cheers.
There's never been so much information and a vast online archive of "go-to-anytime" evidence about Aliens and UFOs on the Moon. This online archive (dotted everywhere) is updated every single time that a UFO is spotted flying across the Moon. If you want to, you can put together a 30 minuet video showing 3 second video clips of UFOs everyday for a week if you want to.
That's how much stuff is been captured on film just showing strange Moon anomalies alone!
This triangle shape UFO though absolutely looks very good because it's the following:
Strange triangular shape spotted on the MOON sends conspiracy theorists into a spin as they speculate the Moon is a base for UFOs.
Footage of a triangular shaped UFO is proof of an air base on the moon, say conspiracy theorists.
Videoed with a high-powered telescope, the shots appear to show a gigantic, black, triangular shape UFO.
UFO truthers were sent into a happy - frenzy, with some claiming that this is proof of a base on the Moon.
But, I always have this strange feeling that NASA are deliberately holding back information and calculatingly and deliberately ignoring the "in your face evidence of UFOs" for some nefarious reasons?
I honestly can't get my head around the fact that this is all flying under the radar of the "big wigs" at NASA so-to-speak?
Why can't the scientists investigate any of these UFO encounters seen flying across the Moon?
I thought that there mission (or their ethos) let's not forget their driving force was to go into space, travel to different places throughout space and look for Alien life, right?
I thought that NASA and SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) was a coming together of like - minded agencies to go further into the unknown and search for Aliens and to try to contact them:
Because NASA keeps (as far as I can tell) deliberately ignoring the glaring evidence, I'm going to ask "what the hell are they doing with all the money that they get"?
So here's a little bit about the agency that has never fulfilled it's main promise or target!
What is NASA's main mission?
NASA opened for business on October 1st, 1958. The agency was created to oversee U.S. space exploration and aeronautics research.
Even if one, just one UFO is real, then Aliens are real and that's my own opinion based on nothing more that common sense.
What is NASA and what is NASA's current purpose in today's world:
NASA is a U.S. government agency that is responsible for science and technology which is related to air and space.
How is NASA funded?
Practically every major program within NASA will receive a boost.
The agency's science programs, which cover planetary missions and Earth science, will receive a total $6.9 billion, up from $6.2 billion from last year.
The human exploration program will get $5 billion, while it got $4.79 billion in 2018.
So, what is SET (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and where is SETI located:
The instrument, called the Allen Telescope Array, is situated at the Hat Creek Observatory, located in the Cascade Mountains just north of Lassen Peak, in California.
Radio SETI experiments have historically relied on existing radio astronomy telescopes.
The footage was captured with a high-powered telescope, the shots appear to show a gigantic, black, triangular shape against the backdrop of the moon’s rocky surface, reports the Daily Mail (all source links provided at bottom of page).
The video of the mystery craft was posted on YouTube by Secure Team 10, a YouTube account that explores mysterious occurrences on the moon, as well as UFO footage:
"You can tell that this is a shadow because you can see the shadow wrapping around the craters’, the narrator of the footage said.
UFOs in recent times are becoming more like a plague and a real menace as they're bold but for what reason and what intentions. Are they a disease, is this an infection like a rash? Why are they here on this planet and are they looking for a host? Are these UFOs a smoke screen to get used to seeing them one at a time.
Is this a pre-invasion and are we going to see an influx of UFOs right across the Earth where they release seeds on land and horrible water born diseases?
Sounds weird doesn't it, but ask yourself this:
"why are we seeing UFOs in the first place"? Your guess is, as good as my guess.
A Pennsylvania witness at Derry reported watching and videotaping a “semi diamond-shaped object with what looked like an enormous spotlight in the sky,” according to testimony in Case 90175 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
MUFON has investigated this UFO case and has determined it to be a real unknown.
This is the best possible outcome because if it was identified as known cause then it would likely be human activity.
It really is only just one step before, or some would say "as good as" a real Alien UFO verdict.
I haven't checked - but I don't think MUFON has ever investigated a UFO case and determined that the UFO is an Alien craft.
Because what happens if if they do determine it to be real...
The event occurred beginning at 11:18 p.m. on February 9, 2018.
“I saw a very bright light in the sky, at first I truly thought it was a plane,” the witness stated.
“As the object got closer the lights and object became brighter and larger in size. It looked like an enormous spotlight in the sky heading towards us. It moved fast until it came close to us and it moved almost in slow motion until it stopped in the middle of the road, just staring at it.”
The witness pulled into a gas station and told her husband to grab her phone and record.
"Repeatedly asking him, ‘what is that? What is that?"
I could see the entire underneath of it.
It was a semi diamond-shaped object.
I say semi because it wasn't exactly a diamond shape.
Under the object there were dozens of fluorescent lights, ranging in color, blue, green, red, and orange lights.
That's right, Neil Armstrong's spacesuit boot "footprint" doesn't actually fit. So, what's going on with this massive blunder. History can't be a l;ie can it? Is there a real argument for Neil Armstrong, heck the full NASA Apollo Moon Mission being a lie? Have peoples argument for this really based on truth.
For me, this was quite a big moment when I first saw this Moon anomaly.
I looked at the image and thought there's no way this is the suit that he wore and this has to be a practice spacesuit here on Earth right - but it's the same one he definitely used on the Moon.
NASA always have a ready made story or answer for every kind of conspiracy theory.
NASA was caught using a green screen instead of a live spacewalk.
The footprint in the photograph apparently belongs to Buzz Aldrin.
Then there's the fact that NASA always cuts the live feed when UFOs turn up.
NASA wants us to believe that the spacesuit is the real one but Neil Armstrong wore "overshoes"!
Shoes that go over the ones in the image and it's these "over shoes" that have left the footprint we see in the famous Moon images.
If you buy that then good on you, but if you don't buy it then yeah, good on you also.
What do I believe?
I believe that the people at NASA always have an answer for every single conspiracy theory that you can throw at them! It's as if no matter what you say, they have a come back already, at the ready so-to-speak.
It's a conspiracy all in itself.
Sorry, but to go one further NASA also said that the Moon photo of the famous or infamous footprint isn't even Neil Armstrongs, it's supposedly Buzz Aldrin's!
Apparently though, the astronauts left the "overshoes" on the Moon, so we'll never know will we? It's quite convenient as far as I can see.
I don't know what to believe because honestly there's really good and "strong arguments" on both sides.
Until I process all the information then and maybe only then will I have a full answer to this for myself, where I'm confident enough to say NASA is a liar, lol.
But when you couple that in with NASA always having a smart answer for every conspiracy and even when they're literally caught out with proof!
If your caught in a lie once, the very definition of a conspiracy theorist is someone who questions the statements given out by "known liars".
But that's my own opinion based on stuff I've seen like the green screen caught on live TV showing a miniature replica scale model of the International Space Station and even the news anchors in the TV studio yelled out "I don't think we was supposed to see that" and "where's your spacesuit"...
That was supposed to be a news station going live to the ISS for a spacewalk but experienced some technical difficulties, yeah like the truth intervening!
Instead the camera cut to another camera overlooking the whole stage floor showing a green screen and a model of the ISS on a platform with people looking on very confused!
That right there sealed it for "me".
It might not seal it for you as we are all different and we all have an opinion. In fact I'm going to put that video in right now:
News Crew Accidentally films FAKE space station footage - YouTube
This is a huge UFO in space and I say it's huge because it's right next to the Russian Progress Cargo Supply Spacecraft so, we can get a gauge on how big this definite UFO actually is. Guys, if you've never seen this UFO video before or if you've only seen the images (like me) of this UFO in particular then I recommend you see the actual video that these UFO images were taken from.
You will really enjoy this huge real UFO video from "Sonofmabaker" which is only short but it's a piece of the UFO disclosure project puzzle.
The Russians was the ones that leaked this real video.
This other space vehicle isn't in any archives anywhere
This specific craft doesn't match any known crafts
My conclusion is that this is a leaked video of a real UFO
Russia has always tried to or done the opposite of what the Americans would like them to do?
The Russians love messing with and clearly like ticking off any and all the successive governments of the USA.
It goes way back to the dawn of time if you ask some people in the US and the Russian Federation formerly known as the USSR!
I have no doubts in my mind why the Russians leaked this UFO news to the public.
Because they know from experience that the US government and NASA always keep this type of UFO stuff under wraps.
I think they're sowing the seeds of collusion and fanning the flames of mistrust (in the US and abroad) and while your dividing the public's opinion - you may conquer the public's opinion - the Russians still cannot get any Americans on their side though.
I knew that this large UFO reminded me of another UFO, as I've researched that many it's hard to remember them all.
The UFO that we see next to the Russian supply Cargo Spaceship in the video, looks near enough the same as the last one that was sent from Phobos 2 in 1988 which was another "Russian" space probe sent to the Mars Moon Phobos and this was the very last image that it sent back before it was lost forever.
It looks near enough the same as it don't you think? I wonder if this is a US UFO Mothership which has been in constant use since the early times of the space age?
It's a curious situation why only Russian spaceships have encountered this spacecraft, or maybe only Russian ones anyways as we might never know if there is any others?
Here is the amazing video which shows the UFO just appear out of nowhere:
Leaked Russian Video Of UFO Near Space Station - YouTube
There are some UFOs that really happen and people film them but literally can't believe what they are seeing and so they focus on that all throughout the video.
But NASA and Russian Cosmonauts are so used to UFOs and unusual activity in space that they are just getting on with their mission.
How crazy is it that an Alien presence doesn't get your attention or if it does get your attention you quickly shrug it off faster than a vehicle passing you on the street.
I think the Cosmonauts and Astronauts are trained to not yell out loud, to not scream in fear, fright or sight of anything at all that startles them.
The Hannah McRoberts Vancouver Photograph has been ruled as a genuine photograph. This is a real UFO according to experts who have fully examined the photograph over the years. Image Credit/Hannah McRoberts.
Seriously, what happens (answer is coming just read on) if you actually take a genuine photo of a UFO and it's investigated and then ruled independently - as a genuine UFO sighting or a real UFO photo?
I'm asking this because I know this has happened before as there's a case from 1981 called the Vancouver Island UFO Photograph which was ruled independently as been a genuine photo.
I looked it up, to see what actually happened after the outcome was revealed to the public and to see what the authorities "really did" in this type of situation or who got involved?
This image has been actually called "the best Flying saucer ever"! It says this on the website UFO CaseBook, OK that doesn't constitute that everyone is saying that, but you definitely see why some would say that.
The actual photograph taken by Hannah McRoberts has been scrutinized by many experts who all say it's real. Image Credit/Hannah McRoberts.
I admit, I wanted to see if it was like the movies and the answer is no. Actually, it's the exact opposite to the movies and that's for real!
I couldn't find anything that has happened since this was confirmed as a genuine UFO image. Even other so-called real UFO photos, nothing happens. This is sad, it's not encouraging at all.
After typing it into Google to see what happens, because there'd be some sort of official or tried and tested way forward right, well actually not. I just typed this (and lots of different variations) into Google:
"what happens after a UFO is ruled as real"
Anyways, back to the "real UFO sighting" where nothing happens when it's confirmed as a real and genuine UFO sighting (potentially changing the course of humanity)...
The above/top photograph was taken in October of 1981 between the 10th and the 15th. So, it's no wonder that the above UFO image is a little blurred but most importantly, it's there and it exists!
All of the zoom in and close up's you see in the images were done by Hannah McRoberts herself whom is the lady that had accidentally taken the photographs in the first place.
That is the main thing to maintain, which is a timeline of the images and who has them, who has examined, what they did, the results they came to and also how they came to their conclusions?
This I'm glad to say has all been done, that and more. The lineage has been maintained, the list of ever growing experts looking at the Hannah McRoberts UFO photos has been kept up to date, logged and signed.
You can't ask for anything more that that, it's an accurate (historically accurate, for history) log of examinations which are non invasive and are all undertaken by the best experts in their respective fields like for instance:
FSR's photographic consultant Mr. Percy Hennell, who is generally regarded as the leading expert in Great Britain, in all matters where colour photography is concerned.
This photo came to the attention of Mr. David A. C. Powell of Vancouver, who is on the staff of the McMilllan Planetarium.
APRO of Tucson, Arizona, the respected American UFO investigation group who claim now to be the oldest in the world also have been involved.
APRO had meanwhile passed their prints of the picture to one of their most eminent specialist consultants, Dr. James Harder, who is the Professor of Engineering in the University of California at Berkeley.
So, as you can see just by this initial, intense scrutiny of the UFO photograph or what we would call today the image went "viral" straight away and most of the UFO experts who was anyone back then got onboard and really wanted to get some answers and, they did.
But it actually could of been a very different story.
The Vancouver Island Photograph, as it's become known has been fully investigated by not just a well respected and independent organization but also individuals of whom are leading the charge in their own fields of expertise and all have ruled this photograph as a likely genuine UFO photograph.
That's all well and good, but what now?
Seriously, what do we do with this information now?
Who do we get in touch with?
Who has taken an interest in this UFO case and taken it further even still...
What happens after a photograph is classed as "likely to be real"?
Well, after looking this up there's absolutely nothing! Not a thing. I'm so frustrated as I was expecting...
Well, I don't really know what I was expecting but in my mind I have scientists camping out at the place the UFO was seen taking readings, examining the trees, different cameras on tripods and everyone taking soil samples, air samples and hazmat suits?
Nope! That doesn't happen at all. The word "nothing" is a very, very accurate way to describe what happens after a UFO or Flying Saucer is ruled as real. It's seems crazy that the file is rubber band and literally placed in a box and then we see a guy walking down the warehouse path.
Turns round puts it on the shelf and the camera pans back wide only for it to be one of thousands of boxes in a darkly lit warehouse, then the light goes off.
Also, the experts only said the photograph was real. Is the UFO real, we might never know.
This is exciting archaeological evidence that was recorded on the Moon, showing us vast ancient ruins of what was probably once lots of magnificent buildings. There's an old saying that I often come back to time and time again, because it's an anchoring "back to basics" block and a simple concept.
If it's not ours, then whos is it?
Why did the US government blow up these ruins?
Was there other possible in tact buildings on the Moon?
Was it really to keep the Russians from getting them?
If it's an intelligently created building on the Moon or specifically made to a design and it's in space, then it simply cannot be ours.
Even if it's a building on the Moon from 1968, just one year before mankind set foot on the Moon, that means they "simply cannot be ours"!
Real videos of any kind, on any subject can be put through a filter to make it look like a fake.
Real videos of Aliens or UFOs in the right hands can be made to look like "ever so slightly" a faked video.
In the right hands a real video can be made to look like a hoax but "only to another expert" when examining it.
In other words, experts can be fooled by other so-called better experts and that is just a science fact of reality.
I think what I'm trying to say is this:
Whoever has the most to either gain or lose - is going to get their own way and demand the outcome is in their favour, no matter what the objectives or the consequences are? In this case it would be NASA.
If it's not us in the past on the Moon, then it has to be an "ancient Alien race" right? That's just common sense if indeed the structures and ruins on the Moon are real?
Albeit it's a bit old news this, but it's relevant to everything and there's definitely someone out there "right now" starting out in the Ufology research field and this is relevant to them because it's evidence of Aliens.
So when people comment on this and say "old news - next" or this is fake, I say show me "your evidence" to back that claim up because I've showed you mine...
So, this is and always will be very relevant in Ufology terms and the information is good. If anyone says it's been debunked I say, no it hasn't. Because like I say, whoever wants an outcome will get it whereas this is, what it is! Maybe it's a paradox going round in circles endlessly?
The Lunar structures in this video suggest that there was once a strong community of workers both building these Moon structures and then using the said same buildings, after their construction was completed.
It also suggests that because the Moon is effectively a dead Moon, with no volcanic or underground activity then the ruins are from many thousands of years of asteroid bombardment and subsequent violent Lunar quakes triggered by the constant bombardment of objects hitting the Moon?
Is this why the Moon was abandoned or was this the reason why it was all moved underground? It would make sense.
This video here of structures and ruins on the Moon has had over 3.14 million views online since it was uploaded:
Ancient Structure On The Moon Filmed By Armstrong, 1969 - YouTube
That's just my opinion though, but it makes sense as it's violent, it would shake the Lunar surface and they've been happening a lot on the Moon over hundreds of thousands of years - if it's anywhere near the truth then I'm happy with that.
It fit's the right categories though what I've just said.
I'm here to show you yet another Silver UFO which seems to keep on showing up at NASA's International Space Station. I'm here to show you that there's a real chain of UFO sightings going way back to pretty much day one. Seriously, I had to stop collecting them for this post.
UFOs visiting the International Space Station is as old as the station itself
Why are people seemingly letting this information go over their heads
Why can't we trace the UFOs steps the cameras are good enough to do that
UFO sightings are nothing new, what is new is confronting you with this info
I totally get it that there's a kind of "helpless feeling" which comes with this whole UFOs at the Space Station thing - because we feel we can't do anything about it, right?
Wrong, we can blog about it and tell people about it who might be able to ask questions in the right ear and expose the lot to the world.
That's a huge ask, that's a massive undertaking which I'm frankly going to say that if people in the right places had the balls to do anything about it, it would of been done by now!
So, we all know now that the people who can do something about UFOs been seen at the ISS it, are not doing anything!
The people who do try to do something about it are either thrown in jail or labeled crazy, unfit or just plain old wrong.
Some often disappear as well and scrubbed from any databases "no trace found".
Misunderstood is what they would probably call it
Got his or her facts upside down and inside out
Got no trace of them ever working for NASA
Sorry nobody has ever heard of Mr such and such
The below video I quickly put together, just showing a tiny percentage of the Silver UFOs visiting the International Space Station:
Video Credit/UFO Sightings Footage/NASA
It makes me wonder, seriously wonder if the UFOs that are been caught on camera attending the ISS are they doing so with the knowledge of NASA or a shadow government?
The above image clearly shows lots of definition in the strange unknown object that is right near the ISS, but what is it? I'm sure someone at NASA asked that very same question but what was their answer?
Is it representatives of humanity or some other as yet unidentified entity or entities...
Because you have to admit this many Silver UFOs visiting the ISS time and time again, is very peculiar?
If it was a mountain or somewhere in Antarctica I can almost guarantee you that people would say "there's a UFO base in Antarctica", right?