Hey everyone and welcome back to Activist-News, today I just wanted to make a really quick video about Britain First Party in the UK. People have asked me what I think about them quite a few times, so hopefully this video will give you an idea. I’m sure many of you are familiar with them if you use Facebook, as they boast the biggest Facebook page of any British political party, at least that I’m aware of anyway. With their 1 and a half million followers, they ,manage to get a lot of viral posts, usually regarding Islam and sharia law. One of the biggest things this Facebook page seems to preach against is religious extremism and the threat of an economic and political takeover at the hands of fundamentalists. In doing this they fail to ever recognize Israel as a threat to peace in the middle east, on top of this, you have the vast majority of the senior members of Britain First who openly support Zionism and the continuous support of its ethnic cleansing campaign. To anybody with half a brain, its very easy to tell that this is just one of many Zionist fronts masquerading as a political party who seems to fish most of their support from bigots who have a very warped understanding of the geo-political situation in the middle east and its influence over the rest of the world.
Britain First is Shill'n for Israel - A Zionist Front - YouTube
Britain First, a registered UK political party, originated back in 2011 and was headed by co-founder Paul Golding, Jim Dowson and deputy leader, Jayda Fransen, A Jewish woman who officially joined the party in 2012. Jayda claims to be a christian woman, although even the Huntington post admit her family tree comes from Jewish origins. Although this party maintains its being lead by British Christians, there obvious defamation campaign seems to match the rhetoric being spewed fourth by the Hasbara fellowship agents on social media. Their attack on Halal certification and their silence on the kosher process, which is actually less humane, speaks for itself in my opinion. Britain First campaigns primarily against multiculturalism and what it sees as the Islamisation of the United Kingdom, it also makes no mention of the Jewish influence over the refugee crisis. The group first gained media attention in 2014 when the Electoral Commission controversially allowed it to use an image of murdered soldier Lee Rigby in literature to promote its standing in the European Elections. Later that year Britain First became known for their “mosque invasions” where it films members aggressively confronting Muslims in their place of worship and editing footage to make Muslims look like the hostile ones. and its just astonishing to me that, they go out and do, exactly what they are preaching against. fundamentalism. And The group does not target similar practices in Orthodox Jewish synagogues at all… no surprise, right? In one of these instances, Jayda Fransen was actually sued by the courts and was forced to apologize, however, this only increased their level of support, due to the way the mainstream media portrayed the event. this parties open support for Zionism, should be enough proof that there is something extremely fishy about this political party, so I dont understand why so many people take them seriously and why there isn’t more people, calling them out for what they are. Impostors, fear mongers and zionist agents.
Back in 2015, Britain First offered “solidarity patrols” in areas of London with high Jewish populations while blaming anti-Semitism on Islam. This actually sparked some public concern at the time as to whether or not there was a link between Jewish lobby groups and Britain first. As a result of this, The Community Security Trust, an organisation against anti-Semitism, put out a public notice to Jews to avoid association with Britain first. The PR campaign was just obvious for anyone to see really.
now, all of this should come as no surprise, because the people who are protesting against the Palestinian activist groups have been trying to smear them as a racial hate movement, constantly labeling these Palestinian human rights activists as anti-semites. Britain first is directly connected to Israel lobby groups who attempted to have the Palestine Expo shut down by the government, on the grounds of “anti-terror” measures. Now, this article comes as no huge surprise, since, back in May of 2016, the very same Paul Besser, can be seen March through the streets of London with a bunch of Zionist agitators, trying to stir p Palestinian rights groups. For an example, this Pro Zionist blog, Praises Paul Besser for his involvement in the counter protest held against, what they call “an anti semite group”.
Did you know that the star of David has no biblical reference and cannot be found anywhere in the Torah? that’s right, there is no reference to the star or shield of David at all. In fact, the earliest archaeological finds, can be found on the wall of a 6th-century synagogue within the borders of ancient Israel. However, there have been variations of the symbols used in other cultures as well, at even earlier dates, which I’ll go over soon. however this star was not popularized again into modern culture until it was used by the Zionist movement, which was started by the Rothschild banking dynasty in association with Theodore Herzl.
As it turns out, Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, who was the son of money lender got the inspiration of using this hexagram from his father, who beared this symbol on the entrance door to his counting house. Bauer recognized the significance of the red hexagram and changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door (“Rot,” is German for, “Red,” “Schild,” is German for, “Sign”). red shield… so Rothschild literally means this symbol. Bauer was also believed to be versed in Jewish mysticism and other kabahlist teachings. The 6 pointed star is called the hexagram and to many Christians, the symbol represents the nation of Israel, they call it the star of David. However, as mentioned earlier, no such star of David can be found, but a closer look at the history and purpose of the symbol will reveal something Much different. The star consists of two intertwined triangles: one pointing up to God and the other pointing down to man, symbolizing the relationship between the two. While there are many other interpretations for the symbol, it is commonly said to mean, as above, so below. however numerically, it also represents the number 666.
666 hexagram “star of david” occultism
which biblically, is the number of the beast. but to break it down more clearly, we can see that there are 6 points on this star, there are also 6 triangles or pyramids, and then finally there is also a six sided polygon within the star. 6 6 6. also, A Masonic book called The Second Mile, an Eastern Star book, reveals that the “six pointed star is a very ancient symbol, and one of the most powerful.” The hexagram is used in magic, witchcraft, sorcery and occultism and the casting of zodiacal horoscopes by astrologers. “It was considered to posses mysterious powers.”
However, to get a proper understanding of this symbol, we need to first go back and see what is written in the bible and just before we do, I firstly wanted to mention that there are no commandments from Jesus or the apostles that says Christians have to get involved with Gods plan for the nation of Israel, especially militarily or politically, short of sharing the gospel with them. The bible does not command it at all, so I have no idea why so many Christians get behind Israel like their souls depend on it, with that said, at the end of acts 6, we are introduced with a character called Stephen, who is a follower of Jesus. in these verses, Stephen is seized and brought before the council of Jewish leaders, verse 11 through 15 record of the false accusations made towards Stephen, quote;
11 Then they suborned men, which said, We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses, and against God.
12 And they stirred up the people, and the elders, and the scribes, and came upon him, and caught him, and brought him to the council,
13 And set up false witnesses, which said, This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place, and the law:
14 For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered us.
15 And all that sat in the council, looking stedfastly on him, saw his face as it had been the face of an angel.
Stephen being judged by the council of Jews – The book of acts depicted in art.
so here we see Stephen accused of speaking blasphemous words against Moses, Jewish customs, God and God’s dwelling place the temple. now does this sound familiar to any of you at all? well, for many Christians who questioned the political and military support for the current nation of Israel are accused of very similar things. its a story we hear all to often. Terms like ‘antisemitism’ come to mind.
beginning in verse 37 Stephen recounts of when the fathers refused the Oracles given to Moses on Mount Sinai and instead desired to set up their own gods, quote.
(Acts 7:39-43King James Version (KJV) )
39 To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt,
40 Saying unto Aaron, Make us gods to go before us: for as for this Moses, which brought us out of the land of Egypt, we wot not what is become of him.
41 And they made a calf in those days, and offered sacrifice unto the idol, and rejoiced in the works of their own hands.
42 Then God turned, and gave them up to worship the host of heaven; as it is written in the book of the prophets, O ye house of Israel, have ye offered to me slain beasts and sacrifices by the space of forty years in the wilderness?
43 Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.
Some christians relate the symbol with lucifer, but there are more esoteric meanings behind it
according to many bible commentaries, the word remphan is synonymous with the planet Saturn. Remphan also appears to have been understood by the Septuagint translators as an equivalent for the Hebrew word “Chiun”, which is supposed by many scholars to be identified with the planet Saturn and keeping that chiun word in mind, we also come accross this written in Amos 5:26
“but ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.”
Moloch, Chiun and Remphan are all names for the star god, Saturn, whose symbol is a six pointed star formed by two triangles. Saturn was the supreme god of the Chaldeans. who’s teachings can be found it freemasonry today. and unsurprisingly this crypto-judaic front, known as freemasonry, also has the great goal to one day, rebuild Solomon’s temple – The OCCULT ONE and NOT a Jewish ONE.
One of the reasons its called the star of david, is because King Solomon adopted it as a main symbol when he was building pagan temples for some of his pagan wives. Former Satanists adamantly state that King Solomon actually became one of the most powerful Shamans in world history, having slipped deeply into the practice of the occult. this view is fully endorsed by first kings 11 4 through 9, just to highlight this in better detail, Dr O.J Graham, in his book, the six pointed star, claims
“The first mention of this symbol was in 922 BC, when Solomon got involved in witchcraft and magic … this book traces the worship of Ashtroreth (Astartee –meaning star) and Chiun and Remphan (meaning star) from the Egyptians before Solomon’s time. Then afterward, in Arab magic and witchcraft, through the Middle Ages, it was used by the Druids, during the highest Sabbath of the witches, called Halloween. The family of the Rothschild, Zionist and Hitler have all used the symbol, as has the Knesset. Finally, it is featured on the flag of Israel.”
we can also see Saturn, depicted as the 6 pointed star in ancient Sumerian and Babylonian art, so we also know that it relates back to this time in which kabbalah and Jewish mysticism were born. Kabbalah is a mystical and occult form of Jewish thought, and is the source for many occult practitioners, from Freemasons, pagans to the new age movement and even Hindus. Its central literature is found in a book called the zohar. and if you d o a bit of research, you will find that it was all very common practice in the talmudic times for Jewish mystics to recycle and even steal esoteric wisdom known to others, from the Greeks, the the Egyptians, the Babylonians and even Hindus. to quote the Jewish encyclopedia on the origins of Zohar, they claim;
“To determine the country in which the work originated and the time at which its teachings began to develop, it is necessary to ascertain where and when the Jews became intimately acquainted with the Hindu philosophy, which more than any other exercised an influence on the Zohar.”
further down they also claim, The theory that the earth is a sphere revolving on its own axis, which immortalized Copernicus, was previously known only to the Hindus, who were instructed in the truth of it by Aryabhatta in the first century before the common era. As far as is known, the Vedanta school of the Hindu philosophers found nowhere, outside of its place of origin, so many admirers as in Persia in the eighth century. Under its influence the Mohammedans of Persia founded many mystic sects, among them being that of the Sufis, who for many centuries were very numerous. This mystic movement did not fail to exercise an influence upon the Persian Jews, and there arose among them various sects, such as the ‘Isawites, the Yudghanites, etc.
In Hinduism, we also see the use of the hexagram, in the form of something called yantras, these yantras all represent a different form of prayer to a deity and a different element is symbolised within each yantra. one yantra is dedicated to obtaining wealth and power and another is linked exclusively to the hindu god shiva. We also know that there is a direct relevence to the planet Saturn and the planet mars and the alignment of those 2 planets. perhaps Mayer amschel Bauer and his father Moses, the first Rothschild, associated their money worship with Shiva and the yantra for wealth, but who knows for sure.
Hindu yantra (kubera) for wealth – 6 pointed hexagram “star of David”
One thing is for certain, this handed down knowledge. which the Jews recycled for themselves, would become an instrumental part of what is kabbalah and Judaism today. as we know most modern Jews put the Talmud above the Torah. through the guise of Judaism, we have a religious sect which openly worships the Gnostic and mystic aspects of ancient cultures and long forgotten god deities.
So we can clearly see how astrology, Saturn worship, Moloch worship and even heliocentricity was all originally coined under kabbalah. it is central and exclusive to Jewish mysticism and the zohar and much of these teachings are pushed into mainstream science even today. while some people claim that the so call star of david has had many different uses in history by different cultures, that part is true, but all the information associated with the hexagram has the same origins. from the perspective or a true Jew who follows the torah, it is written that these types of mysticism are forbid den and are related to satan. and from a true Christians perspective, they should view this star as an abomination and should not associate it with “gods chosen people”,
because even the new testimate forbids this type of mysticism. these people are said to be false Jews, in the book of revelations… in fact, revelations 2.9 says “I know your afflictions and your poverty–yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.” so there you have it folks, from the christian perspective, and the torah true jewish perspective, that star, is synonomous with evil and is not a symbol of david. but is the symbol of wealth, shiva, saturn and satan. and is now the symbol that rothschild demands is used on the flag of the state of Israel. the same star that the people of israel decorate their tanks and bombs with. the same star that brainwashed christians idolise today.
The Star of David explained - Synagogue of Satan - YouTube
There can be little doubt that the chemical attacks in Syria were a false flag, but nobody seems to have identified the right culprits, or even the people who stand to benefit from Trumps new angle on Syria. It seems to me that there are plenty of people who are struggling to make sense of the situation in Syria. Even many truth seekers themselves don’t know what the hell they are talking about. So today, it’s my hope to help some of you out there unravel the truth about what is really going on. Both Trump this year, and Obama in 2013 have blood on their hands. The Chemical Weapons Attack is being used as a “False Flag” a pretext and a justification to wage an illegal war of aggression. Most of us already know that part, but most people don’t seem to understand that the United States is being used to fulfill Zionist and Jewish Elitist ambitions, not American ones. If this sounds like a bold statement, we tried to elaborate in this video below, please be sure to watch.
Syria, The chemical attacks and Donald Trump - The untold truth - YouTube
As the Syrian Government doesn’t utilise a Rothschild Central Bank, the U.S. basically wants to go in and do what they did in Libya and Iraq. High-jacking the currency in use now, overthrow the government, and forcibly change the economy, which will then be maintained by people with connections to Goldman Sachs and the IMF. Obviously these corporations are controlled by jewish Elitists, NOT American Nationalists. So, despite what RT and WikiLeaks have been telling you, this isn’t an American attack on Syria. This is a Zionist and Jewish Bankers attack on Syria. Again, using the United States to do its dirty work. The United States has a huge debt to the bankers. Somehow they need to pay it back, its that simple… what happens when you stop paying your bills and taxes? They come and take your house and your car. Everything THEY own. Well, that’s exactly what is happening to the United States. People who think American politicians are behind all this? Simply don’t have any clue what they are talking about.
Children victims of the recent chemical attack in Syria, used as a false flag
Through the art of deception, Mossad espionage, the banking systems and Operation Talpiot, the Israeli government has more or less hijacked the United State’s military and intelligence departments. Almost all of the technology they use comes from Israel. Almost all of that is maintained by private and outsourced Israeli corporations, like Intel and Rafael Defense. The same corporations that lobby the United State’s and Australian governments to maintain a higher military expenditure are the same corporations who handle our military’s most secret information.
Award winning journalist Barrett Brown, was released from Federal prison in Texas on the 30th of November, 2015. The United States District Judge ‘Sam Lindsay’ originally sentenced Barrett Brown to serve a total of 63 month in prison and was ordered to pay close to a million dollars in fines. At the time of his sentencing, he had already served 28 months and had 34 months remaining. Brown was released early on good behavior. When Brown was released, he was spoted by reporters at McDonald’s but had little more than a smile to share.
Barrett Brown finally released from prison (Texas 2016)
Brown originally was indicted in Texas federal court in December 2012 on numerous counts, including identity theft, hyperlinking and possession of stolen credit card numbers. Although most of these charges were dropped by authorities eventually, Barrett still managed to serve quite a bit of time for copy and pasting a link from one Internet relay chat channel, called #Anonops, to another channel under his control, called #ProjectPM. The link that he copied was also spread elsewhere by others, although at the time Barrett was considered responsible for the leak. At sentencing, the 35-year-old Texan was ordered to continue making $200 monthly payments to Stratfor, for the bill of $900,000 in total.
INTELLIGENCE CONTRACTORS - Barrett Brown - YouTube
The link that Barrett was sharing, led to data Which was hacked by infamous political hacktivist Jeremy Hammond – founder of HackThisSite – and others, the contents revealed emails and other data from private intelligence firm Stratfor. This leaked data was also released to Wikileaks by Hammond and the arrests were largely due to the FBI informant known as Sabu.
Hammond admittedly took part in the hack against Stratfor’s network, which leaked an estimated 60,000 credit card numbers and associated data and millions of emails to Anonymous IRC channels – Where Barrett picked it up from – and Wikileaks. However, according to Hammond, he was not the mastermind behind the operation. he claimed on trial that “I had never even heard of Stratfor until Sabu brought it to my attention,” and that Sabu was introduced to him by an anonymous friend known only as ‘Hyrriiya’ recently before. According to the chat logs obtained by the FBI, on Dec. 4, 2011, Hyrriiya informed Sabu that he’d compromised Stratfor’s systems. Monsegur responded, “That’s perfect for #antisec.” Hammond was not present during this initial conversation about Stratfor, which took place in an Internet Relay Chat (IRC) room called “#Revolusec.”
Brendan O’Connell has found himself on the run from the Zionist elements and corruption within Western Australian politics, Recently in an interview with Activist-News, he expressed his concerns for his safety. In a very telling confession, Brendan takes us back to where it all began and leads us through to where he is today. In his own words;
“Its a strange feeling – being “on the run”. Stateless. Warrants out for your arrest. I’m not from Syria. Not from Iran. Not from Iraq. I’m from Australia, and it’s not a joke.”
Brendon O’Connell gives us an update on his situation in Iran, talks to us about Zionism, Western Australian Corruption and how it relates to his incredible set of circumstances. This interview was done by Daniel Walker (activist-news.com) and Brendan O’Connell on the 20/11/2016 via Skype. We cover a lot of controversial topics, like WA Minister Joe Francis, Seeking Political Asylum in Iran, Freemasonic lodges in Australia and much more. Brendon was also kind enough to supply us some photos of his travels so far.
Brendon O'Connell Interview - Australian Political Dissident - YouTube
Brendan has assured us that he will be staying in touch with us and keeping us up to date. He has currently received political Asylum in Iran but is staying in Kuala Lumpur. During his travels he has met with officials overseas who are taking his concerns seriously, at this stage Brendon has announced that he has no plans to return home to Western Australia and given the scenario, you cant really blame him. Like him or hate him, Brendan has opened up a very large can of worms in Western Australia and nobody seems to want to deal with it or give it any attention. The little attention Brendon has received is anything but fair, with some News outlets going as far to claim Brendon is delusional and racist. The fact of the matter is, that sweeping Zionism and Freemasonry under the rug as a conspiracy theory dosn’t work anymore, because of this many people have started coming out against this element of corruption within Western Australia.
Brendon O’Connell in Iran, just days before our interview
It is our hopes that Brendon and his story will be heard by everyone in Australia, so that they can make their own minds up. The abundance of evidence and official documentation that Brendon provides on his blog cannot be ignored any longer. For years now, the Australian government have been lobbied by Zionist organisations and war contractors to keep our military expenditure high, our mining investments high and our prejudice of corporatism and Jewish power down. In our interview, Brendon claims that it was his research and writings on Israeli/Australian trade investments and security programs that got him red flagged as an anti-Semite and targeted in the process. Brendon also claims that he will not back down and he fully intends to expose the truth.
Brendon has uncovered plenty of interesting and even controversial topics in the past, related directly to people within his hometown, which for his own safety, had to flee. We are currently trying to raise awareness and funds for Brendon O’Connell, who is experiencing major financial difficulties abroad, not to mention the complete isolation that he has expressed to us. If anyone is in a position to help Brendon, who is currently in Kuala Lumpur in order to keep expenses to a minimum, it would go a long way. Brendon does have a paypal available at email@example.com if you want to keep up to date with his blog entries, check here; isolatebutpreserve.blogspot.com.au
I first wanted to explain what a Scientific Theory is, by definition. According to the general consensus among many various volumes, the dictionary definitions will tell you this; “A Scientific Theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not “guesses” but reliable accounts of the real world.”
The reason I mention this is because there seems to be a very big misunderstanding between a Theory and a Scientific Theory, as the later (the Scientific Theory) is supposed to be backed by observably repeatable facts.
I’m under the impression that many people have taken this Monkey Man Evolution Theory literally. Literally as fact, without the knowledge there isn’t ANY observably repeatable scientific proof to confirm it. There seems to be a common practice these days within mainstream science to further push the Darwin Theories of Evolution as a Scientific Fact, when in truth you cannot even call it a Scientific Theory.
It’s conjecture at best, and it is my hope to present to you, MY Top Seven proofs AGAINST Evolution.
For an example of what I’m talking about, let us consider the words of Nikola Tesla. Tesla was quoted as saying “Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality”
If you ask me, those words ring with more true today than they did back in Tesla’s time. Now, before I begin to detail what are MY Top Seven proofs AGAINST Evolution I’m going to read just one more quote, from Michio Kaku.
Kaku claimed “Usually in science, if we’re off by a factor of 2 or a factor of 10, we call that horrible. We say something’s wrong with the theory, we’re off by a factor of 10! However in cosmology, we’re off by a factor of 10 to 120. That is 1 with a hundred and twenty zeros after it. This is the largest mismatch between theory and experiment in the history of science.”
Hopefully, that gives you guys an indication as to what I’m talking about here. So, without further delay, MY top Seven proofs AGAINST Evolution are as follows.
The “Missing Link”
Generations of students, possibly including yourself, have been taught that we come from monkeys. the only piece of evidence that was ever attributed to this very bold claim was a study which was conducted back in 2005, which suggested that chimpanzees are 96% genetically the same as Human beings, therefor, they must be our closest relative. wow, astonishing, right? wrong! this is based on an interpretation of data and it does not confirm that we are from monkeys at all. What isnt being told, is that one human being is only 98% the same as another human being and that a cat is about 90% genetically the same as a human, using the same methodology, a fruit fly is almost genetically identical to a human being and a Banana is about 65% the same, genetically as a human. so you can throw all of these numbers around, but it only proves that all living creatures consist of a very similar genetic makeup. If you consider the fact that a fruit fly is one of the creatures we are genetically closest to, the only proof ever given, really does fall apart. Especially given the complex number of differences between humans and apes, which i wont get into here today. but the variety of differences is worthy of a video length feature within itself.
So what about real observable proof, what can we point at to show that we have or have not come from monkeys? well according to the father of evolution, Charles Darwin, the greatest proof for this claim or against this claim, would exist in the fossil record. Charles Darwin, in his book, origin of species, stated; “if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties linking most closely all of the species of the same group together must assuredly have existed. Consequently, evidence of their former existence could be found only among fossil remains. Darwin at the time knew of no such transitional forms, but he made it fairly obvious to his readers that he would hope there would be many found in the future. If you skip to his chapter, entitled ‘difficulties on the theory’ Darwin is quotes as saying that the single biggest stumbling block against his claim, was the lack of evidence in the fossil record. he called it ” the most obvious and greatest objection which can be urged against my theory.” Well, to this day, that missing link has still not been found, in fact, there is no fossil evidence which shows that we came from apes, let alone monkeys. In fact, if you look into all of the supposed fossils being used as supposed intermediate species between ape and man, you will find that every single one of them have been disproved as hoaxes once they were independently tested, from Nebraska man to Lucy, all of them were frauds or fakes and we will get into this more later on.
The reason they call it a missing link, is because it never happened and that is exactly why monkeys still exist today, any drastic change occurring environmentally would have effected all of the monkeys, not just some. the fact that monkeys are here side by side with humans show that natural selection across a common ancestor did not take place. so, at first you have evolutionists strongly support the idea that men came from the monkeys. then you have this whole idea being destroyed by the natural science, which is observable evidence, or the lack there of. The lack of evidence to support we came from monkeys was so vilifying that evolutionists had to rethink their system of belief. Funnily enough, it has become one of the jokes of the history books, with not even Darwinist themselves believing we came from monkeys, in fact some Darwinist who suffer from severe cognitive dissonance would urge that Darwin never made the claim we came from monkeys, But, according to the descent of man, part one, Charles Darwin wrote “The simiadae then branched off into two great stems, the new world and old world monkeys; anmd from the later, at a remote period, Man, the wonder of glory of the universe, proceeded.” now, he certainly did not say that we humans evolved from a common ancestor, he said, we proceeded from “old world monkeys”. Much to the embarrassment of Darwinists and their time frames given, we did not evolve from monkeys and corrections should be made to the education systems that push this as a fact in their curriculum, as there is no observable evidence.
Nowadays, within Neo-Darwinist circles, monkey is no longer considered the descent of man, so if you still believe this, you may want to study up on some research. Neo-Darwinists now claim that we had a common ancestor with apes, but of course, there is no evidence whatsoever. literally none exists. some Darwinist claim that mutation is responsible for the rapid changes that led apes to humans and that lava must have destroyed all the fossil proofs. well, that to me sounds like a desperate grasping at straws and wild conclusions which are not supported by scientific facts. Colin Patterson, a senior paleontologist from the British museum of natural history, even he admits that Darwinist must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve, he was quoted as saying the following, “no one has ever produced a species by mechanism of natural selection, no one has ever gotten near it and most of the current argument in neo Darwinism is about this question.”
It is near impossible to discuss Evolution without bringing up the Big Bang Theory. By removing the possibility of Intelligent Design, we are left with one option… Coincidental Randomness, over a long period of time. About 4 billion years is the number accepted by NASA and Mainstream Science for when this supposed Big Bang took place. Again, the number one problem with this theory is that it’s not a scientific theory that can be proven with observable and repeatable evidence. The theory that nothing, for no purposeful reason suddenly exploded and created everything. Suddenly, yet took only then to create perfectly synchronized solar systems which would go on to spawn the Origins of life. Unconsciously and yet to the point of progressive improvement capabilities? Not only does this go against all laws of physics, it also goes against the second law of Thermodynamics, which is Entropy. Scientific evidence shows that all systems, living or otherwise, will surely descend into chaos, disorder or decay. All things observed everywhere eventually deteriorate, wear out or wither away.
The idea of Entropy comes from a scientific law of Thermodynamics dealing with energy. It usually refers to the idea that everything in the universe eventually moves from order to disorder, and Entropy is the measurement of that change. As far as we can scientifically tell, systems left to their own devices will always get more chaotic over time. It is well known, that left to themselves chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials. They do not ultimately become more complex. According to Dr Frank A. Greco, a Thermodynamics scholar, there is no recorded experiment in the history of science that contradicts the second law or its corollaries. He was also quoted saying, “An answer can readily be given to the question….(Has the second law of Thermodynamics been circumvented?)… NOT YET.” A number of scientists believe the Second Law, when truly understood, is enough to refute the Theory of Evolution. In fact, it is one of the most important reasons why various Evolutionists have dropped their theory in favor of Intelligent Design. As Dr John Ross of Harvard University rightly states,
“There are no known violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ordinarily the Second Law is stated for isolated systems, but the Second Law applies equally well to open systems”.
Scientists have not been able to prove that a protein or even a single amino acid molecule composing a protein could have formed under what they call Primordial Earth Conditions. Not even in their elaborately equipped laboratories have they succeeded in doing so. The idea that every living creature on earth could have derived from one single living cell being created by chance, would be like a tornado going through a junkyard dump and leaving behind an exact replica of the latest model Ferrari. In all actuality there are more chances of that happening. Entropy and Probability however, show us that this will never happen.
This law has plenty of everyday examples….buildings break down over time, and food spoils if not eaten soon enough. In both cases, the amount of disorder increases with time but the opposite is never true. Buildings don’t strengthen themselves and no amount of waiting will cause rotten food to become edible again. But because Evolution results in an increase in the order and complexity of species — which is a decrease in entropy — some critics like myself would argue that the Big Bang being origination of a living cell occurring by chance and the extensive environment needed to house the cell being present all at the same time, only to eventually ascend into order, is impossible. Impossible and goes against almost everything we know about Science. The Big Bang Evolution Theory, is not a Scientific Theory based on observable and repeatable results. The idea that the universe has always been in existence has been thoroughly rejected on scientific grounds. The Laws of Thermodynamics show the universe must have had a beginning. The First Law of Thermodynamics says that there is only a finite amount of energy. The Second Law says that the amount of available energy is continually decreasing. If the universe had existed forever, all the available existing energy would have already been used up.
If you go to google and type in “is evolution fact or theory” the top answer you might get is this one, a quote from, biologist Richard Lenski, which says, “Scientific understanding requires both facts and theories that can explain those facts in a coherent manner. Evolution, in this context, is both a fact and a theory. It is an incontrovertible fact that organisms have changed, or evolved, during the history of life on Earth.” Aside from the fact that no distinction is being made between micro evolution and macro evolution in his answer, a normal person might be under the impression that evolution is based on fact, where there isnt anything that actually proves it.
Irreducible complexity is a term coined by Michael Behe, who defines it as follows. “Irreducible complexity is just a fancy phrase I use to mean a single system which is composed of several interacting parts, and where the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to cease functioning.” To put this more simply, half developed lungs or half developed eyes will not work. whether you are talking about an organ or even a living cell, there needs to be a number of factors in place for these body parts to work. if we were to go backward to a primordial form, we would face the difficulties of explaining how survival was possible when transitioning organs and body parts were in place. not only that, but you would expect to see the fossil record full of these intermediate species, there would literally be more fossils of these transitional forms, then there would be anything else, and yet there are none. I want you to think about that for a moment. the fact is, to this day, Macro evolution has not been proven to ever of happened according to the fossil record. The idea that one species of animal has ever or can ever transition itself into a new species of animal is an unscientific one, that has never been confirmed with evidence. While Darwin was correct with his observations of micro evolution, which means physical variations and environmental adaptations within a species, there remains no observable evidence to support this theory of macro evolution. which is, one species of animal, evolving into an entire different species of animal. In order for mammals to have existed at all, it is suggested by evolutionists that they evolved from reptiles. However this seems to be another good example of wishful thinking that isn’t corroborated by scientific facts, to better explain this, reptiles are cold blooded, lay eggs, do not suckle their young and have one middle ear bone, three mandible bones and bodies covered in scales, whereas mammals are warm blooded, have live births, suckle their young, have 3 middle ear bones, one mandible bone and are covered in fur or hair. They claim reptiles came to mammals, but this transition has never been observed in fossil remains and too many biological changes would need to take place for the evolution to happen.
A good example of irreducible complexity can be seen within the the bombardier beetle, According to experts, the the bombardier beetle defends itself by mixing chemicals that explode, firing to twin tale tubes, that can swivel like gun turrets. the liquid that squirts out at 105 degrees Celsius is enough to deter most predators, the blast of the beetle is very powerful and is enough to blow it up, and in fact it would blow up if it wasn’t for the unique way in which the chemicals are fired. In short, biologists claim that there is just no way that the the bombardier beetle defense system could have evolved over time. any slight variations or primitive forms to this mechanism would render it self destructive. In short, a beetle that blew itself up, would not be around to develop a more sophisticated firing system. This is also just one of many animals which defy evolution, because of biological complexities, which cannot be reduced.
To put the irreducible complexity of a living cell into perspective, let us consider the words of Adnan Oktar, who writes;
“evolutionary theory claims that life started with a cell that formed by chance. According to this scenario, 4 billion years ago various lifeless chemical compounds underwent a reaction in the primordial atmosphere on the earth, in which the effects of thunderbolts and atmospheric pressure led to the formation of the first living cell. The first thing that must be said, is that the claim that inanimate materials can come together to form life is an unscientific one that has not been verified by any experiment or observation. Life is only ever generated from life, each living cell is formed by the replication of another cell. No one in the world has succeeded in forming a living cell by bringing inanimate materials together, not even in the most advanced laboratories. The theory of evolution faces no greater crisis than on the point of explaining the emergence of life. The reason is, that organic molecules are so complex that their formation cannot possibly be explained as being coincidental and it is manifestly impossible for an organic cell to have been formed by chance. How could all the interconnected and compartmentalized components, like the cell wall, the cell membrane, the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, RNA, ribosomes, lysosomes, cytoplasm, vacuoles, nucleus and other cell parts magically come together and create conscious intelligent life, from unconscious dead matter.”
Whether you are talking about the first living cell, or the chances of that cell surviving and you put that down to chance and random happenstance, not only does it go against the law of entropy, but you begin to border on a mathematical impossibility to the extent that the word misleading, is a huge understatement. To summarize all thats been said in this section, Irreducible complexity and the fossil record, indicate that macro evolution has not ever occurred and the scientific evidence stacked against it, should be enough to bury this as a myth forever. One would expect to see millions of these intermediate species in the fossil record, but they are just not present.
Human Evolution In-coherency
Instead of asking why we still have apes, we should be asking why don’t we have the hypothetical ape-like ancestor, the real missing link? Or, why don’t we have the required intermediate forms? How can such change happen? Just how clear and coherent is the human evolution story? well these are the exact concerns raised by Dr William A. Hoesch, who stated;
“We should also ask, how could such a transition happen? The only way we know to acquire new genes is to alter existing genes through random mutation. The best alteration science has observed has produced only novel re-combinations — most deteriorate the genetic information and thus harm the offspring. Many mutations are fatal. Evolution requires trillions of innovative mutations to produce man from lower forms, and at least millions to produce man or apes from an ape-like ancestor. None have been observed. Evolution tales are pseudo-scientific stories about an imaginary history. Evolution is best understood as an anti-God origins myth, attempting to explain man’s existence without a Creator. We can do better.”
Australopithecus evolved into Homo erectus around 1.5 million years ago and Homo erectus, in turn, evolved into Homo sapiens around 400,000 years ago. This is presented to school children as no less certain than Washington’s crossing of the Delaware. The statement makes dual claims: (1) there are fundamental anatomical differences between these three categories, and (2) each occurs in the right time frame. Let us examine these claims.
The anatomical differences between these three groups must be very substantial for the statement to have any meaning. Any anthropologist should be able to spot a Homo erectus on a crowded subway train, even clean-shaven and in a business suit, as different from modern humans. Not so. In fact, leading anthropologists Milford H. Wolpoff (University of Michigan), William S. Laughlin (U. of Connecticut), Gabriel Ward Lasker (Wayne State U.), Kenneth A. R. Kennedy (Cornell), Jerome Cybulski (National Museum of Man, Ottawa), and Donald Johanson (Institute of Human Origins) find the differences between these fossil categories to be so small that they have wondered in print if H. sapiens and H. erectus are one and the same. Fossils classified as H. erectus all share a set of “primitive” traits including a sloping forehead and large brow ridges, yet these all fall comfortably within the range of what are called normal humans today. For example, the very same traits are found in some modern people groups, including Eskimos! Eskimos might not like being referred to as “primitive” humans,..
More information has surfaced on the nefarious organ harvesting syndicates that are present in Syria, new information further corroborates the widely believed assertion by many, that the practice is largely being run by Israeli and Turkish interests. Director-General of the Syria Coroner’s Office Hussein Noufel disclosed that the bodily organs of thousands of Syrian civilians have been sold in the international black markets over the past six years. He claimed “We have accurate information that over 25,000 surgical operations have been conducted in the refugee camps of the neighboring countries and in the terrorist-controlled areas in Syria” . he stated.
With the war in Syria coming into its 6th year, we have seen all sorts of brutality and exploitation being carried out. almost the entirety of this Zionist manufactured war on terrorism, is being played out in the interests of imperialistic US-Israeli foreign policy. Nations like Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey and the USA have long sought to overthrow Assad and this is why we see all of these nations secretly supporting, arming, training and financing moderate rebels and ISIS militants. I personally dont believe the situation ins Syria has ever been a civil war, it has always been about regime change, oil, resources and the plan to create the greater state of Israel. If all of this information is new to you, or if you want more details, I suggest you check out this video below.
Israel, Turkey and ISIS are illegally harvesting organs in Syria - YouTube
Many of you out there might be wondering who operate and dominate these black markets? well according to many sources, whistle blowers, journalists and many Syrians, the entire operation is being run by the Mossad agents, Turkish agents and ISIS militants. The Arabic Al-Hadath news website quoted the sources as saying that some specific groups that have trained medics have kidnapped the children, mutilated their bodily organs and then left their corpses in remote areas along the border. According to these same reports, an Israeli officer in Turkey is waiting for the children’s organs to be transferred to the black market for transplantation.The sources said that the medical teams of these groups have anesthesiologists, surgeons and a number of armed forces who abduct children and transfer them to safe areas for surgery in brand-new and fully equipped ambulances.
The Spanish daily El Mondo reported that ISIS were now using organs and bodily parts of its captives, as a way to combat the lack of medical support. ISIS are now using organ harvesting as a way to finance its operations and save the lives of injured members. so this is obviously one of the ways that Zionists have tried to isolate themselves from ISIS, by trying to set up these independent streams of passive income and supplies. The reason I say this is because numerous times have the UN observed ISIS militants using the Israeli controlled Golan Heights as a sanctuary from bombing, numerous ISIS militants have also been spotted being treated in Israeli run hospitals.
Israelis have a very extensive history in the lucrative organ harvesting industry, with many of its victims being sourced from Palestinians. The Zionist, Saudi and Turkish led alliance seems to be a very large part of this trade, with all sides having deep involvement and even being a part of the enabling process which allows for underground black markets to thrive. Now, im no doctor, but one thing I do know is, that there are numerous organs in the human body that are useless, unless they have come out of a living person. another point worth noting is just how widespread this underground practice is, with many of these transplants even taking place in public hospitals. There is just no limit to the level of exploitation that the Zionists are willing to sink to, the complete absence of morality speaks for itself.
Israeli officials plan to annex the West Bank, after being ordered to leave their illegal outpost in the West Bank by the UN. In September of this year Mahmoud Abbas (President of the state of Palestine) insisted that Palestine would renew its plan to pass a UN Security Council resolution declaring Jewish “settlements” illegal, despite Israeli condemnation and threats. Palestinian leaders have initiated several unilateral resolutions at the UN Security Council over the years, with little success. Zionists and right wing Israeli officials have responded to this by rallying up supporters at demonstrations, calling for the complete annexation of the west bank.
Israeli soldiers also invaded Beit Awwa town, south of the southern West Bank city of Hebron, searched homes and kidnapped Mo’taz Nayef Masalma, Abdul-Fattah Nayef Masalma, and one Palestinian in al-Baq’a area, east of Hebron.
As debates in the Security Council continue, Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett demanded that Israelis get ready to annex proposed settlement areas, if the UN Security Council votes on any resolutions on the matter. Despite this being completely illegal, the Minister is not alone on this view, many proposals are currently under consideration by Israeli officials.
“There is a discussion that in the coming months the UN Security Council will force a resolution on Israel. If that happens, we need to have an appropriate Zionist response, immediate sovereignty over Judea and Samaria, including Maaleh Adumim, Gush Etzion, Ariel, Ofra and Beit El,” (Naftali Bennett)
“The UNSC council [sic] resolution should be a trigger to put this plan into action,” said Bennet. “Gentlemen, it is time to extend our sovereignty in the land of Israel. “There are those who talk and those who act. We’re on the side of those who act… Why do I say this? The entire story of settling [the land] and Zionism is a story of a great vision and the determination to see that vision through,” the minister said.
image by UNTV – Looking across the council table at Palestinian envoy Riyad Mansour, he demanded: “Will you condemn Palestinians who commit terror attacks against Israelis?”
Right-wing Israeli politicians plan to produce a new bill to annex the third largest West Bank settlement, Ma’aleh Adumim, home to around 38,000 people, despite the UN ordering Israel to abandon its military post in the West Bank. Israeli State Attorney’s Office asked the UN for a delay of seven months from the Dec. 25 deadline ordered by the Supreme Court to evacuate Amona, saying it could not arrange alternative housing for the residents before the target date. The Amona outpost was built on private Palestinian land. Since 1997, the Supreme Court has issued several demolition orders for the settlement, all of which have been ignored by Israel. The crimes committed by Israel usually don’t get reported on by the mainstream media, in fact Palestinian journalists have recently revealed that the number of Palestinian homes demolished by Israeli authorities, in the largest division of the occupied West Bank since the beginning of the current year, stands at more than 700. Israeli officials who call for the annexation of these West Bank settlements are showing no regard for international law and are promoting more war crimes, by attempting to justify their inability to agree to any state solution other than the greater state of Israel, as proposed by many political Zionists.
Israeli Prime minister Netanyahu has announced that he will be going ahead with plans to settle Jewish migrants on Palestinian land, he stated “We are ready at all times to hold direct negotiations without preconditions with our neighbors; however, they are not prepared to hold them with us,” he said. “These are the two things that are preventing peace, not a few apartments near the city of Ma’ale Adumim, or several neighborhoods in Jerusalem.”
The Israeli disrespect for international law is getting worse, with the announcement that Israeli police have abducted 11 Palestinian civilians from their homes in the last month, all within the occupied areas of the West Bank. nother Zionist Israeli leader calling for the annexation of the West Bank, is Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely, a hard-line member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party.
Deputy Foreign Minister Hotovely meets European officials to demand governments stop providing cash to allegedly anti-Israel organizations – YNet News
“The answer to the international struggle over Jerusalem is applying sovereignty over Ma’ale Adumim, which will guarantee Jerusalem will always remain united and develop,” Hotovely said in Jerusalem at a rally organized by the pro-settlement Yesha Council.
these remarks by Tzipi Hotovely (who has in the past called for the annexation of the entire West Bank) fermented a concerned response from Palestine Liberation Organization secretary-general, Saeb Erekat, who stated.
“What was said is not surprising,” he said regarding Hotovely’s comments, adding that the Israeli government “supports settlements rather than a two-state solution, as evidenced by home demolitions carried out Monday in the Jordan Valley.”
In a special government cabinet meeting last April in Gamla within the occupied Syrian land known as the Golan Heights, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared, “the Golan will always remain in Israel’s hands. Israel will never withdraw from the Golan Heights.”
Israel plans to annex the West Bank if the U.N interferes - YouTube
Earlier this Week, the Zionist conservative Theresa May, British PM, made the time out of her Brexit schedule to attend a ‘Conservative Friends of Israel’ (CFI) meeting, where she made a grand speech about anti-semitism. Theresa May also announced that the UK is formally adopting a definition of anti-Semitism within laws, agreed on earlier this year by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). The policy looks to infringe on free speech, the very criticism of Israeli policies and all of this will be fast tracked in order to avoid being scrutinized.
“It is unacceptable that there is anti-semitism in this country. It is even worse that incidents are reportedly on the rise. As a government, we are making a real difference and adopting this measure is a ground-breaking step,” May said.
“Anyone guilty of that [anti-Semitism] will be called out on it, British Prime Minister Theresa May stated at the private pro-israel meeting.
With Israeli ministers calling to annex the entire west bank if the United Nations intervenes, many Palestinian human rights agencies are very concerned with the news that they may have to remain silent, on certain key points when discussing Israeli settlements. Theresa May and her team failed to elaborate on the small print which makes this definition problematic, especially for anti-Zionists. The IHRA’s small print moves immediately to bring criticism of Israel into the definition as an example of anti-Semitism stating that “manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Some of the examples could be considered bigoted for sure, but just have a look at some of these examples given by the IHRA;
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis
The text of the IHRA definition is based on a draft document first circulated by a pro-zionist agency back in 2005, only to be subsequently abandoned as not fit for purpose. That particular definition, drafted with the help of pro-Israel advocacy groups, was the subject of serious critique for its conflation of genuine anti-Semitic bigotry on the one hand, and criticism of or opposition to Zionism and the State of Israel on the other. It raises a lot of concern about the true intentions behind silencing criticism of Israel. The new definition of anti-Semitism has been adopted without consultation with the Palestinian people or British Palestinians to ascertain its impact on them. They were not put in place by going through the usual routes, where people can discuss its effectiveness. At the very least, Brexit should have made an impact assessment, to assess the unintended consequences of silencing Palestinians and their supporters through the adoption of the new definition – unless of course that was the intention. Where does this leave the UK as a proudly democratic society that values freedom of speech?
In response to a bit of backlash, Theresa May has announced that she will be going ahead with the plans and that one of the motivations behind doing so, was the need to combat an increasing level of anti-semitism among the left side of politics. Labour has had to suspend 18 members, including one MP and a former mayor of London, because of their alleged anti-semitic attacks in parliament. It leaves British parliamentarians caught between a rock and a hard place, following the vote to exit the European Union, where upsetting Muslims and other non-whites is fine. Upsetting friends of Israel is not allowed, however – especially, but not exclusively, if they are Jewish.
What is Zionism?
Political Zionism is a Jewish Nationalist movement, which has been around since about 1865, Its followers are made up of Jewish and non Jewish people who embrace cultural colonialism. The fundamental purpose of Zionism, has always been to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine and beyond this region. The ideology of Zionism can be seen as far back in history as 200 CE, within Rabbinic Judaism’s Oral law, commonly refereed to as the The Talmud. Political Zionism is most commonly believed to have started officially in 1896 by Theodor Herzl, whose goal (As a cultural Jew, not a religious one) was the return of Jews to ‘Eretz Yisrael’, or ‘Zion’, the Jewish synonym for Jerusalem and the Land of Israel (Palestine).
Members of the Neturei Karta Orthodox Jewish group protest against the Israeli occupation of Palestine.
Nowadays, many things can be attributed toward the inception of a Jewish state in Palestine, but none more perhaps than the influential drive behind Zionism. Israel is perhaps one of the most nationalist and ethnocentric nations on earth and yet it receives the most financial aid of any country in the world.The success of Zionism has meant that the percentage of the world’s Jewish population who live in Israel has steadily grown over the years and today 40% of the world’s Jews live in Israel. There are currently 6.1 million Jews living in modern day Israel (around 75% of the population). Israel also have one of the most advanced armies in the world, boasting some of the most sophisticated technological advancements in air and ground combat.
Surveying drones used by Gold Fields Australia – One of the worlds largest gold mining companies – have become the unlikely prey of the native Australian wedge-tailed eagle, These drones, also known as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to survey mines in St Ives Western Australia and cost upwards of $20,000 each. ‘Gold Fields Australia’ claims that 10 drones (Trimble UX5 systems) have been destroyed since they initiated the drone surveying program at the st ives mine, One crashed as a result of human error, while nine have been taken down by wedge-tailed eagles, which are known to hunt down prey as big as kangaroos.
Video below (filmed in rural Victoria) shows wedge-tailed eagles targeting drones (UAVs)
Eagle vs Drone - 2m Wedge-Tailed Eagle takes down Drone. Watch it Punch it out of the sky - YouTube
Drone surveying tools being destroyed by eagles has reportedly cost the South African company more than $100,000 so far. Rick Steven, a head mine surveyor for Gold Fields Australia, said nine of his Trimble UX5 drones had been lost to the native bird, which he has labelled a natural enemy of the drone. “Eagles are extremely territorial birds,” Steven told reporters.
“Seeing a UAV in the sky, obviously they consider it a threat and something that’s encroaching on their territory.”
On the advice from a birds of prey rehabilitation centre, Steven’s team were told to camouflage the drone so that it would look like a juvenile eagle. Mr Stevens attempt to camouflage the drones as baby eagles reportedly failed, as the technique only temporarily diverted the eagles. They are the largest bird of prey in Australia and the fifth largest eagle in the world, with a massive wingspan of up to 2.3 meters, whereas the drones are constructed from foam and carbon fibre, and fly at an altitude of only 125 meters, with a wingspan of only about 1 meter. The stats explain why the drones make a very easy target for the birds, which boast very impressive features, like the ability to see infrared and ultra-violet rays. The heroic hunting machine is only going about its nature, but is getting away with some awesome vigilante styled justice in the process.
Trimble UX5 drone being disguised as a juvenile eagle… lol, not good enough apparently
Gold Fields Australia are claiming loss of income as a result, but are encroaching on the natural habitats of native and protected species of birds in the process. Gold Fields Australia, who’s Australian operations make up 30 per cent of the gold exploration spend in Australia, is noted to have caused many environmental problems which have impacted on the well being of animals in the past, but luckily for the mining company, the eagle will likely not get its day in court. Gold mining is arguably one of the most environmentally destructive forms of mining being used in Australia. It creates massive amounts of toxic waste and causes more global mercury pollution than any other source. Gold mining also destroys landscapes, pollutes rivers with sulfuric acid, poisons the soil, and contaminate water supplies permanently. In short, gold mining today relies on practices that are extremely harmful to the environment, so we were honestly happy to hear of this unlikely hero fighting back. Nature 1, Gold Fields Australia 0.