In this guide, we’ve rated and reviewed six of the best wireless gaming mouses at a range of different price points and feature sets. So, if you’re looking for a new mouse, check out our recommendations below.
Wireless gaming mice have never been an ideal option for hardcore gamers due to the limitations that come from using a wireless connection. However, in recent years, wireless mouse (especially options at the higher-end of the market) have become much more reliable and there are quite a few options out there that are suitable for competitive gamers.
So, in this guide, we’ve taken a look at six options currently available and rated them based on the price they come in at and the features and performance they offer. That way, you’ll be in a better position to find the best wireless gaming mouse for your needs.
The table below will give you a quick-look at our picks for the top wireless gaming mice. We’ve made selections for the best wireless gaming mouse overall, our runner-up pick, the option that offers the best price-to-performance, and the best cheap wireless gaming mouse.
If there is any brand out there that dominates the market for wireless gaming mice, it’s Logitech. Logitech easily has the most wireless mouse options out there and their wireless mice are typically regarded as the best options out there. And, the same is true for their newest wireless gaming mouse, the Logitech G Pro.
The Logitech G Pro is currently the pinnacle of wireless gaming-specific mice. The G Pro comes with an incredible 48-hour battery life when the RGB lights are turned on and a 60-hour battery life with the RGB lights are turned off. It also only weighs 80 grams, easily making it the lightest mouse on this list.
It is not a cheap option by any means, though, as it does come in at just under ~$150. However, with an ambidextrous design, a 50-million click lifespan, the ability to hit up to 16,000 DPI, and Logitech’s HERO 16K sensor, the Logitech G Pro is easily the best wireless gaming mouse out there when you take price out of the equation.
Logitech does offer other solid options that come in at lower prices, though, and if you wanted to save some money, the G903 or G703 listed below would be worthy alternatives.
Before Logitech’s release of the G Pro, their G903 was often considered to be the best wireless option on the market. However, the release of the G Pro didn’t make the G903 completely obsolete as the G903 comes in at ~$40 cheaper than the G Pro. So, if you don’t want to quite pay ~$150 for the G Pro, the G903 is a nice alternative that won’t set your wallet back quite as far.
The G903 can hit up 12,000 DPI, it comes with an ambidextrous-style design, it has two-zone RGB lighting, and it weighs 110 grams. For battery life, the G903 can last up to 32 hours on a single charge if you run the mouse without the RGB lights turned on, or up to 24 hours with the RGB lights turned on.
Like the G Pro, the G903 also comes with switches that are rated for 50 million clicks.
While the G903 trails slightly behind the G Pro in terms of high-end features, overall it is still one of the best options currently available. So, if you want to save a little bit of money, the G903 is a worthy competitor to the G Pro.
If you don’t have over $100 to spend on a gaming mouse, but you want an accurate and reliable option that you can use for serious gaming, the Logitech G703 offers a nice balance between performance and cost.
At just a little over $80, the G703 is often regarded as the sweet spot for wireless gaming mice, as it won’t set you back hundreds of dollars and it is strong enough to serve the needs of most gamers. In fact, it has a lot of the same features that the G903 has despite being ~$30 less expensive.
It comes with two-zone RGB lighting, the ability to go up to a maximum setting of 12,000 DPI, it weighs ~110 grams, and it comes with six programmable buttons and a 50-million click lifespan.
The G703 doesn’t have the same ambidextrous design that the G903 has, though, so if you’re a left-handed gamer, this one won’t work for you.
Ultimately, in terms of price-to-performance, we feel like the G703 currently offers the best performance in comparison to the price it comes in at.
If you’re just looking for a cheap gaming mouse that will serve you fairly well for casual gaming, the E-Blue Mazer II would be worth considering. At right about ~$20, the Mazer II is by far the least expensive option on this list. There are cheap wireless mouse out there, but for budget-oriented gamers, the Mazer II will offer the best performance out of all of the wireless mouse options that come in under $30.
The Mazer II comes with the ability to adjust your DPI up to 2,500 max, but you can also set it to 500 DPI, 1200 DPI, and 1800 DPI as well with the adjustable DPI button on the center of the mouse. The Mazer II also comes with six buttons, blue LED lights, and a battery life of ~30 hours on a single charge. Its Omron switches are rated for five million clicks.
Overall, the E-Blue Mazer II probably isn’t an ideal option for competitive gamers. However, if you’re working with a tight budget and you need a wireless mouse, the Mazer II is probably your best bet in the sub-$30 price range.
One high-end alternative to the Logitech G Pro is ASUS’ ROG Spatha RGB gaming mouse. The ROG Spatha mainly gets knocked for the fact that it is a laser mouse (and not an optical mouse like the top options on this list) and it is incredibly heavy in comparison to the other top wireless mice.
However, if you’re an MMO gamer and you need as many programmable buttons as possible, the Spatha will offer you more buttons than any other option on this list. Whereas most of the other wireless mice listed here come with six programmable buttons, the ROG Spatha comes with 12 programmable buttons.
But, in terms of accuracy, weight, and reliability, you’ll get much better performance at this price range with the Logitech G Pro (or, even with the less expensive G903 and G703.)
So, in the end, at the high price that the Spatha comes in at, it’s probably only best suited for MMO gamers who have an unlimited budget.
In terms of price, the Razer Lancehead directly competes with the Logitech G903. Like the G903, the Lancehead is also an ambidextrous-style mouse that comes in at right around ~$115. But, although the Lancehead features a higher maximum DPI setting (up to 16,000), it doesn’t come with as many RGB zones (one zone for the Lancehead and two for the G903), as long of a battery life, or as strong of a sensor as the G903 comes with.
So, while the two do cost similarly, if performance is your main objective, the G903 is probably the better option for the price. The Lancehead is still worth considering, though, if you can pick it up on sale during the holidays.
But, in the end, you’d be better off choosing the G903 over it, and even the G703 if you want to save some money.
Is A Wireless Gaming Mouse Right for You?
While a wireless gaming mouse won’t be as ideal of an option for hardcore gamers as a wired mouse will, the reality is that over the past few years, wireless mice have become more and more reliable. So, if you could use the mobility that a wireless mouse offers and you want an option that will serve you well for gaming, one of the options listed above should work for you, regardless of your needs or budget.
Strapped for cash but need an affordable gaming mouse? In this guide, we’ve rated six cheap gaming mice to help you find a solid option for your budget and needs.
If you’re a serious gamer and you can afford to spend more than $30 on a gaming mouse, you probably should. While, for the most part, the skill you have in a game will be the biggest determining factor of your success in that game, for ultra-competitive gamers that are looking for every advantage possible, choosing a quality gaming mouse can mean the difference between victory and defeat.
However, not everyone can afford a high-end gaming mouse and so, if you are in need of a new mouse and you want an option that won’t have a significant negative impact on your gaming (if any at all), then one of the budget gaming mice below should work for you. Again, these aren’t ideal options (especially the options under $20), but some of them are decent enough to provide you with solid all-around performance.
As a quick-look view at our picks for the best cheap gaming mice under $30, we’ve chosen the best option overall, the best option for playing MMOs, the best cheap wireless gaming mouse, and the best option under $10.
For our pick for the best gaming mouse under $30, we chose the SteelSeries Rival 110. Technically, we cheated a little bit as the Rival 110 comes in at just slightly over $30. However, we felt that its price was close enough to the $30 threshold to warrant inclusion on this list.
The Rival 110 uses SteelSeries’ new TrueMove1 optical sensor for 1 to 1 tracking. It’s a lightweight mouse (weighing in at ~90 grams) with a smaller design and will work best for gamers with smaller hands (or gamers who just prefer a lighter mouse.)
For DPI levels (or, in the case of the Rival 110, SteelSeries uses ‘CPI’) on the Rival 110, you can adjust the mouse in 100 CPI increments from 100 CPI all the way up to 7,200 CPI. And, the Rival 110 comes with mechanical switches that have a 30-million click lifespan.
Overall, if there are any mice under $30 that will offer you a high-end experience, the SteelSeries Rival 110 is probably the most likely one to do so.
Most MMO gamers benefit more by having mouses with more programmable buttons on them that they can use to set up macros on. And, for that reason, the Logitech G300s and its nine programmable buttons are well-suited for MMO-style games.
The Logitech G300s doesn’t come with as high of DPI settings as the Corsair Harpoon, but it is a lightweight mouse that comes with an ambidextrous design. So, if you’re a left-handed PC gamer, this is an option that will work well for you, too.
It also comes in at nearly ~$10 cheaper than the Harpoon, so even if you are more into first-person shooters and/or MOBAs, the lower price that the G300s comes in at might make it a better option for your budget.
Ultimately, the low price and the extra programmable buttons on the G300s help it stand out as one of the better options in the sub-$30 price range.
If you need a cheap wireless gaming mouse, you might want to check out the E-Blue Mazer II. The Mazer II is easily one of the cheapest options for anyone looking for a wireless mouse. (Although, there are even cheaper wireless options out there.)
You can hit up to 2,500 DPI on the Mazer II with options to switch to 500, 1,200, and 1,800 as well. The Mazer II also comes with six buttons and blue LED lights and it weighs 140 grams as well. So, it isn’t quite as light as the two options listed above. It is also designed to be used by right-handed gamers.
The Omron switches on the Mazer II come with a lifespan of up to five million clicks and for battery life, you can expect about ~30 hours out of a single charge.
Overall, the Mazer II is a decent gaming mouse and will be one of the better options for gamers who want an affordable wireless mouse.
If you just need a temporary solution to hold you over until you are able to afford a higher-end option, the Lenrue Laser gaming mouse is about as cheap of a “gaming” mouse as you’ll find. The Lenrue Laser comes in at just under $8 and it sports a fairly gaming-oriented design.
You can adjust the mouse’s DPI to four different levels, including 1,200 DPI, 1,600 DPI, 2,400 DPI, and 3,200 DPI. The mouse also comes with LED lights that go through a four-color breathing cycle and it weighs a total of 120 grams.
Ultimately, if you can’t afford to spend over $10 on a mouse, the Lenrue Laser will be an option for you. But, you probably shouldn’t expect the world out of this mouse and you should really only be using it as a temporary solution.
As a nice alternative option to our top pick (the SteelSeries Rival 110), we like Corsair’s Harpoon RGB mouse. The mouse comes with six programmable buttons, RGB lighting, and weighs just 85 grams.
It is an optical mouse and it can hit up to 6,000 DPI through the on-the-fly DPI control. The Harpoon comes with Omron switches that are rated for 20 million clicks. The Harpoon does have a lightweight and smaller design, so it will work better for gamers who have smaller hands (but probably not for gamers who have larger hands or who prefer larger mice.)
Overall, if you’re looking for a budget-friendly RGB gaming mouse that is lightweight and will work well for most gamers (especially those playing first-person shooters or MOBAs), the Corsair Harpoon is a worthy option. If you’re looking for a mouse that is better suited for MMOs, though, you might want to check out the Logitech G300s listed above as it comes with more programmable buttons.
Another cheap gaming mouse option you have is Redragon’s M601. At right about ~$12, the Redragon M601 is the second cheapest option on this list. The mouse weighs ~140 grams, but it does come with a set of eight additional weights that each weigh 2.4 grams to help you tune the weight of the mouse to your liking.
The M601 also comes with six total buttons, five of which are programmable. And, it has red LED lights as well. For DPI settings, you can adjust the DPI on the fly to four different levels: 800 DPI, 1,600 DPI, 2,400 DPI, and 3,200 DPI.
In the end, though, the Redragon M601, like the Lenrue Laser, is not going to be an option that serious gamers will want to consider—or, at least, it’s not an option that serious gamers will want to consider as a long-term solution. Instead, the M601 would be best served for gamers that need a decent temporary solution until they can afford a higher-end option.
If You’ve Got A Tight Budget, These Cheap Gaming Mice Should Work for You
As we mentioned above, a cheap gaming mouse won’t be an ideal option for hardcore competitive gamers. However, our top picks will be decent enough options for the majority of gamers and, at the very least, the mice mentioned above can work well as temporary solutions until you can afford a higher-end gaming mouse
If you’re in the market for a new gaming computer and you want to go with a prebuilt system, in this guide, we’ve compared seven of the best prebuilt gaming PCs at various price-points to help you find the right option for your budget.
In my opinion, you’re always going to get more bang for your buck if you build your own system. And, if you are willing to take on the task of building your own PC, I recommend checking out our affordable PC build guide, or our high-end PC build guide for recommendations on part lists at various budgets.
However, if you’re not up for building your system and you just want to get a prebuilt gaming PC, in this guide, we’ve rated seven different options you have at a variety of price points. All of these options can be found on Amazon, but if you want a more customized system than the options listed below, check out our guide on the Best Custom PC Builders.
A Quick Look at the Best Prebuilt Gaming Computers
As a quick-look view at four of our top picks for the best prebuilt gaming computers, we’ve made selections for the best extreme prebuilt system, the best high-end prebuilt computer, the best value option, and the best budget-friendly prebuilt gaming PC.
If you have an extreme budget and you want to get a prebuilt gaming computer that can handle anything your throw at, you might want to check out CyberPowerPC’s Gamer Supreme desktop. It comes with a brand new RTX 2080 Ti 11GB graphics card, an Intel Core i7-8700K processor, 32GB of DDR4 memory, a 480GB SSD, and a 3TB hard drive.
It also comes with a 120mm AIO cooler, plenty of RGB lights, a keyboard, a mouse, and a case that has a PSU shroud and a tempered glass side panel.
In terms of performance, the RTX 2080 Ti and i7-8700K combination are good enough to jump into 4K gaming or to push games on a 1440P 144Hz+ gaming monitor. If you’re just looking to play games on a 1080P monitor, though, you could easily get away with spending a lot less as even the budget-friendly CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme listed below should be able to max out most games at 1080P resolution.
Ultimately, though, the Gamer Supreme desktop from CyberPowerPC is one of the more affordable options out there that comes with the new RTX 2080 Ti graphics card and its other specs make it a really high-end system.
If you want to build a gaming PC that will offer similar performance to this pre-built desktop, check out our $2,000 Gaming PC Build.
If you want to save a little bit of money and still be able to play games on a higher resolution monitor (like a 4K gaming monitor) or even on a 240Hz monitor, the Skytech Gaming Omega should also get the job done for you.
The Omega comes with an Intel Core i7-8700K processor, a GTX 1080 Ti 11GB graphics card, and 16GB of DDR4 memory. While the Omega doesn’t come with a newer ray tracing enabled GPU (RTX-series) like the CyberPowerPC Gamer Supreme listed above, or the CyberPowerPC Xtreme Liquid listed in our Honorable Mentions section, the GTX 1080 Ti that it does come with will still be powerful enough to game at 1440P or 4K with higher refresh rates.
And, the Omega comes in at a significantly lower price than the Gamer Supreme and slightly less than the Xtreme Liquid.
This system also comes with a 250GB SSD, a 2TB hard drive, and a 120mm AIO cooler as well.
Ultimately, if you’re looking for the best pre-built gaming desktop under $2,000, this is definitely an option you’ll want to consider.
For our top value option, we chose the Skytech Beast because of the hardware it comes with and the price it comes in at. For just under $1,300 you get a PC that has a new Ryzen 7 2700X processor and a GTX 1080 8GB graphics card. That combination is good enough to be able to jump into 4K gaming.
The system does only come with 8GB of RAM, but seeing as how memory is the easiest upgrade to make on a computer, you can easily take it up to 16GB of RAM by adding a second 8GB stick of memory in the future.
For storage, the Skytech Beast comes with a 120GB SSD and a 1TB hard drive. So, while it doesn’t have as much storage as the two options above, it still comes with a decent amount overall.
Ultimately, while the Skytech Beast doesn’t come with a ton of storage or RAM out of the box, you’d be hardpressed to find a GTX 1080 in a prebuilt desktop at this price.
If you’re looking for an affordable prebuilt gaming PC, for just under $800 you can land the fairly powerful CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme. The Gamer Xtreme comes with an Intel Core i5-8400, an AMD RX 580 4GB graphics card, 8GB of DDR4 memory, and a 1TB hard drive.
This system is by no means capable of running games at 4K or even 1440P, but for 1080P gaming, this system will be able to max out pretty much anything you throw at it. And, because it has an AMD graphics card in it, you can pair it with an affordable 144Hz monitor with FreeSync for an ultra smooth in-game experience.
The system also comes with red LED lights, a keyboard and a mouse, and a case that has a transparent side panel and a PSU shroud.
Overall, for the price that this system comes in at and the performance it is able to deliver, it offers a phenomenal value for gamers that are looking for a solid prebuilt desktop for 1080P gaming.
If you’re willing to build your own system, you can check out our $600 gaming PC build for a similar performing DIY option.
At just a little over $2,000, the CyberPowerPC Xtreme Liquid is a nice alternative to our extreme pick, the CyberPowerPC Gamer Supreme.
Like the Gamer Supreme, CyberPowerPC’s Xtreme Liquid comes with an Intel Core i7-8700K processor. However, the Xtreme Liquid opts for an RTX 2080 instead of a 2080 Ti. And, it has less memory and a smaller SSD and hard drive, too.
Still, though, the RTX 2080 is good enough for 1440P and 4K gaming and would pair will with a G-Sync monitor for an incredibly smooth in-game experience. In fact, the RTX 2080 will outperform the GTX 1080 Ti found in our ‘High-End’ pick, the Skytech Omega, as well.
So, while this is an Honorable Mention pick, if you have a budget that places you right around the ~$2,000 mark, this system will be better suited for you than the more expesive Gamer Supreme desktop from CyberPowerPC will.
The Zotac GAMING MEK1 might be a better fit for you if you want to get a prebuilt small form-factor gaming PC. This mini gaming desktop comes with an Intel Core i7-7700 processor, an NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti graphics card, 16GB of DDR4 memory, a 240GB SSD, and a 1TB hard drive.
So, despite its smaller size, it is still able to fit a powerful GTX 1070 Ti inside of it. And, while it does feature an older generation i7-7700 CPU, the combination of the 7700 and the GTX 1070 Ti will still be good enough to max out any game on a 1080P monitor with ease and it should even be able to handle games on a 1440P or 4K monitor as well.
It does come in at ~$1,600, though, so in terms of price-to-performance, I’d recommend paying a little bit extra to get the Skytech Omega listed above, or save a little bit of money and get the Skytech Beast, as it has a better graphics card in it. However, if you like the smaller form factor that the MEK1 comes with, then this is one of the best mini prebuilt gaming PCs out there right now.
Mousepads are really underrated components in a computer user’s setup. No, they won’t make your computer run faster and, no, you can’t use them to input instructions for your computer to carry out. Yet, they get used almost as much as your keyboard and your mouse do. And, just like how it’s a good idea to clean the other components and peripherals in your system, it’s also a good idea to give your mousepad a good cleaning every now and again.
So, in this guide, we’re going to go over a few different methods that you can use to clean off your mousepad, ranging from simple and quick methods, to washing them in your sink or your washing machine.
*NOTE: The second and third methods laid out in this guide are only intended for cloth-based mousepads.
1. Ultra-Quick Method: Use A Baby Wipe, Sponge, or Damp Cloth
I’ve had the same mousepad for quite a few years and it’s never gotten so bad to where I’ve become disgusted with it and had to do a full-on cleaning of it. (Although, I have had to fully clean past mouse pads and we’ll discuss those methods further down in the post). Part of that is because I have been fortunate enough to not spill anything on it, and the other part of it is that I regularly wipe it off with a baby wipe/damp cloth so nothing too significant can build up over time.
For a quick method to clean your mousepad, use a baby wipe (if you have them), a wet sponge, or a damp cloth to give your mousepad a wipe down. If your mousepad isn’t stained or too dirty, this should do the trick.
And, really, if you’re just looking to get off the dust, dandruff, hair, tiny food particles, etc., all you really need to do is to give your mousepad a good wiping down. I use a baby wipe, but even a damp rag/cloth or a sponge will work to freshen up your mousepad if it doesn’t need a full cleaning.
Doing this quick-clean method on a regular basis will cut down on the need for full cleanings and it will work for both cloth mousepads and hard mousepads. However, if you’ve spilled something on your mousepad or there is an excessive amount of stains, grime, or debris on it, you’ll want to try one of the two methods below.
2. Wash Your Mousepad in A Sink
If you’ve spilled food or drink on your mousepad, or it’s just been too long since you’ve cleaned it and it’s not looking its best, you can simply do the following:
Start filling your sink with warm water
Pour some dish soap in
Throw your mousepad into the soapy water
Let it soak for a bit to loosen up the dirt/food/debris
Using a scrub brush or a sponge, lightly go over the mouse pad in the water
Drain the sink and rinse the mousepad
Let the mousepad air dry overnight or use a hair dryer to try and speed up the process
This method is simple, effective, and, aside from the drying time, won’t take too long. If you need an even deeper cleaning you can try the method outlined below…
3. Clean Your Mousepad in Your Washing Machine
If cleaning your mousepad in your sink with a bit of dish soap didn’t get all of the stains out, you can try throwing it in the washing machine and see if that does the trick.
Throw your mousepad into your washing machine
Drop in a bit of laundry detergent/soap
Change your washing machine’s settings to a lighter cycle and make sure it won’t be using hot water
Let your washing machine do its thing
Pull the mousepad out and air dry it overnight or use a hair dryer to try and speed up the process
While most mousepads are washing machine friendly, you might want to try cleaning it in your washing machine as a last result (unless you like to live dangerously). Running it through a washing machine is a bit rougher of a process and if any of these methods would have a chance to ruin your mousepad, it would be this one. However, as long as you don’t use hot water, the chances are that it will come out okay (and cleaner than ever) is pretty good.
Most washing machines will allow you to change the temperature of the water used in the cycle. To clean your mousepad, I’d recommend using cold water, or the warm-cold setting, to avoid damaging your mousepad or peeling the glue that binds the cloth-top to the rubber backing.
Also, for that matter, it’s important to note that you probably shouldn’t throw your mousepad in your dryer after you’ve cleaned it to try and speed up the drying process. Or, at least, if you do, make sure you turn the heat setting to low or even to the air dry setting. The excess amount of heat from the dryer could melt the rubber backing on your mousepad or cause the glue that holds the rubber backing and the cloth-top together to break apart. Again, you could try and throw it in a dryer on a lower heat setting and that might be fine… but if you don’t like to live dangerously, air drying it will be the least likely drying method to ruin your mousepad.
How Do You Clean Your Mousepad?
In the grand scheme of things, cleaning your mousepad is a fairly straightforward and simple process. You can wipe it down if it isn’t too dirty and isn’t stained, or you can throw it in your sink or washing machine with some soap if it needs a more heavy-duty cleaning. And, for the most part, those three methods should help bring your mousepad back to life.
What about you, though? How do you clean your mousepad? If you’ve got some super top secret method for getting your mousepad looking brand new, share it with us in the comment section below!
In this guide, we’ve taken a look at seven of the best webcams for streaming and compared them based on their price and feature set in order to help you make the best decision possible.
While the types of games you play—and your skill level in those games—is a big determing factor in how successful you can become as a streamer, perhaps nothing is more important to your success as a streamer than who you are as a person. Whether you’re funny, or charming, or witty, or just all-around entertaining, it will be you that your followers continue to come back and watch.
If you have the personality necessary to continually bring your followers back to watch your streams, it’s a good idea—for various reasons—to give them a face to match to your personality. The best way to do that is by streaming a liveview of yourself while you play your games on stream. And, to do that, you’ll need a webcam.
In this guide, we’ve compared seven of the best webcams for streaming for now and into 2019 in order to help you find the best option for your budget and your needs. So, whether you’re looking to start streaming, or you’re looking to upgrade your current stream, one of the webcams below should help you out.
For those of you who want a quick-look at the top webcams, the table below showcases our pick for the best overall option, our runner-up pick, our selection for the best value webcame, and our top affordable option, too. Our ratings include both the webcam’s features and specs and the price it comes in at.
In our opinion and based on many of the reviews we’ve read, Logitech’s C922x and C920 are the two best webcams currently available, both because of the features and specifications they come with and the price they come in at.
The C920 is a little bit less expensive than the C922x, but the C922x has a couple of different features that helps it stand a bit above the C920. First and foremost, the C922x can stream at 720P resolution at 60 frames per second, whereas the C920 can only do 720P at 30 FPS. Both cameras can also stream at 1080P at 30 FPS as well.
The other main difference between the two cameras is their ability to handle low-light streaming. If you already have a solid lighting setup, this shouldn’t come into play, but if you don’t have great lighting, the C922x is going to be able to deliver a better quality picture than the C920 will—although, the C920 is no slouch in this category as well.
The C922x is also marketed with some background removal features, but that feature is actually software-based and not something specific to the C922x. So, ultimately, if you don’t mind spending ~$10 extra to get the C922x’s better low-light performance and the ability to stream at 720P @ 60FPS, that’s probably the better route to go. Or, if you don’t need either of those features, you could save a little bit and get the C920.
The Razer Kiyo is another solid option for streamers, but ultimately falls up a bit short to both the Logitech C922x and the C920 both on overall quality and the price it comes in at. At just under $100, the Kiyo comes in at ~$30 more than the C920 and ~$20 more than the C922x and both options from Logitech offer a better picture quality on average.
The Kiyo can stream at 720P @ 60FPS, so it does hold that advantage over the C920. And, it comes with a ring light that is supposed to help solve low-light issues as well and, for the most part, most users have found it helpful—although, there are complaints that the light can be distracting and it isn’t great for low-light scenarios.
Overall, we’d recommend passing on the Kiyo, mostly because of the fact that the C920 and C922x will offer a better solution for a lower price.
We’ve already highlighted most of the positives of the C920 in our overview of the C922x, but as a general run-down, the C920 is on par with the C922x in most respects, except that it doesn’t quite perform as well in low-light scenarios (although, it does have decent light correction settings that will help), and it can’t stream at 720P @ 60FPS (instead, it’s limited to 30FPS at both 720P and 1080P.)
However, if you don’t mind streaming at 30FPS (which still isn’t bad) and you already have a decent lighting setup to eliminate low lighting (which, if you’re a serious streamer, you should probably have anyways), then the C920 will still be able to provide a picture quality on par with the C920.
Ultimately, though, the C922x is just $10 more and so while the C920 won’t differ from it very much in the grand scheme of things, it really isn’t the big of a leap in price to get those extra features that the C922x offers. So, that’s the route we’d recommend going if you don’t mind paying a little extra.
If you’re just starting out streaming, or you are looking to incorporate a live view of yourself into your existing stream, and you just need a cheap option to test out how it goes, for under $25 the Microsoft LifeCam HD-3000 will offer you a decent solution at an affordable price.
The LifeCam HD-3000 is limited to streaming at 720P @ 30FPS, but the picture quality is pretty decent for such a low cost. It won’t be a high-end option by any means and it won’t perform well in low-light situations, but if you’re looking to limit your investment into a webcam before you’re fully ready to commit to becoming a serious streamer, this is a nice entry-level option that will allow you to do so without breaking the bank.
One high-end option out there is the Logitech Brio. The Brio has a couple of features that Logitech’s marketing team has emphasized on, including the ability to stream at 4K resolution at 30FPS and 1080P resolution at 60FPS.
Logitech also touts the Brio’s ability to “eliminate” background through the provided software. However, most users have reported that the quality of the background removal feature is shoddy at best. And, if you wanted to go the route of background removal, you’d be much better off going the green screen route.
Still, though, the Brio will offer a solid stream quality in the grand scheme of things and it is one of only a few options that allows for 4K streaming. The downside, though, is the price it comes in at. At just under $175, the Brio is the most expensive option on this list. And, unless you want to stream at 4K @30FPS, you’d probably be better off going with the Logitech C922x or C920 for a fraction of the price.
The Creative Blasterx Senz3D is another webcam option that tried to swing for the fences with advanced features, but ends up falling short. Like the Logitech Brio, the Senz3D touts its ability to recreate a green screen effect (or, to eliminate your background) through provided software. But, like the Brio, the Senz3D’s background removal process doesn’t really work that well. Although, it’s software can do other neat things like scan 3D objects (which you can then upload into Minecraft!)
However, unlike the Brio, there really isn’t much else that helps the Senz3D stand out despite the fact that it costs just under ~$150. Like the C922x, it can stream at 1080P @ 30FPS or 720P @ 60FPS. But, since it costs ~$80 more than the C922x, that isn’t a great consolation.
Ultimately, we’d recommend avoiding the Senz3D if you’re specifically looking for a streaming webcam, but if the other features jump out at you as something you can use, it might be worth considering.
An alternative option to the C920 is the C930e. The C930e offers pretty much the same streaming quality as the C920 and currently comes in at the same price. It can only stream at 1080P @and 720P @ 30FPS (sames as the C920) and it comes in at just under $70 as well.
The only upgraded feature on the C930e is the fact that..
In this guide, we’ve compared seven of the best 240Hz monitors currently available to help you find the right option for your needs and budget.
If you’re a serious competitive gamer and you are looking to gain every advantage possible over your competitors, one hardware upgrade you might want to consider is to get a new 240Hz monitor. The insanely high refresh rate may not be as advantageous for the casual PC gamer, but for rising esports gamers, the faster refresh rate could mean the difference between winning and losing.
So, in this guide, we’ve rated and reviewed seven top 240Hz monitors in order to help competitive gamers find the best gaming monitor for their needs.
Our quick-look table lists our top picks for the best 240Hz gaming monitors. We’ve selected four monitors, including our top overall pick, our runner-up selection, the 240Hz monitor with the biggest screen, and the cheapest 240hz monitor as well.
In our opinion, ViewSonic’s XG series offers the best option for gamers who are looking to purchase a 240Hz monitor. And, that is mainly due to the price that their two 240Hz monitors come in at. In the XG series, you can choose between the XG2530 and XG2560, with the only difference being that the XG2530 is a FreeSync monitor and the XG2560 is a G-Sync monitor.
So, the one that is right for you will be determined by whether you have (or are planning on getting) an AMD graphics card or an NVIDIA graphics card (although, it’s looking like NVIDIA GPUs could be supporting AMD’s FreeSync technology in the very near future.)
Both XG monitors come with 25″ 1080P resolution displays and have 1ms GTG responses times as well. And, for pricing, the XG2530 (FreeSync) comes in at ~$350 and the XG2560 (G-Sync) comes in at ~$450. While the XG2530 isn’t the cheapest FreeSync monitor on this list (check the Acer XF250Q below), the XG2560 is the cheapest G-Sync monitor with a 240Hz refresh rate
And, since the main difference between all of these displays is price, we feel like ViewSonic’s XG series currently offers has the best price-to-performance on their 240Hz displays.
Like the ViewSonic XG series, Alienware also has two 240Hz monitors, one being a FreeSync display and the other being a G-Sync display. While Alienware’s options are definitely high-end, they fall slightly behind ViewSonic’s pricing with their 240Hz FreeSync option coming in at ~$360 and the G-Sync option coming in at ~$495.
So, the FreeSync options between both ViewSonic and Alienware are priced pretty similarly (although, again, the Acer XF250Q is cheaper than both options), but ViewSonic’s 240Hz G-Sync display comes in at ~$50 cheaper than Alienware’s.
Aside from their variable refresh rate technology, the Alienware offers pretty much identical specs to ViewSonic’s XG series. It comes with a 25″ TN panel that has a 1080P resolution and a 1ms GTG response time.
Ultimately, we’d recommend going with ViewSonic instead if you’re looking to get a G-Sync display and the cheaper Acer model listed below if you’re looking to get a FreeSync display, but if Alienware’s 240Hz monitors go one sale and you can get them for less, they would be worth considering.
All of the other 240Hz displays on this list come with 25″ screens. The Acer Predator XB272, however, comes with a 27″ screen. So, if you want a 240Hz monitor but you want a screen that is larger than 25″, the XB272 is your only option.
And, for those extra diagonal two inches, you’ll have to pay a premium as the XB272 costs ~$540, making it the second most expensive option on this list.
Along with its larger screen size, the XB272 comes with a 1080P TN panel display, a 1ms GTG response time and features NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology. There is currently no FreeSync version of the Predator XB272.
Another option from Acer, the XF250Q, might just be the best option on this list. And, that’s because, when you consider the core monitor specs that typically separate one panel from another, all of the options on this list are pretty much the same in regards to those specs. So, the only real differences between them are, first, whether they are FreeSync displays or G-Sync, and second, how much they cost.
And, the Acer XF250Q easily comes in at the lowest price out of all the other options on this list. For just under $300 you can land the XF250Q. It is a FreeSync monitor, so you will need to pair it with an AMD radeon graphics card. (However, as I mentioned above, it is looking more and more likely that we will see FreeSync support on NVIDIA GPUs in the near future.)
It also comes with a 25″ screen that features a TN panel and a 1080P resolution, and it also comes with a 1ms rsesponse time. Ultimately, though, if price is your main concern, the XF250Q comes in at ~$50 cheaper than the next cheapest FreeSync monitor on this list. So, if you’re looking for price-to-performance, the XF250Q is probably your best bet.
While ASUS typically dominates the upper-end of the different sub-categories of gaming monitors and despite the PG258Q being a really high-end option, its biggest limiting factor is its price. At just under $550, the ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q is the most expensive monitor on this list.
And, unlike the second most expensive 240Hz monitor listed here (the Acer Predater XB272), the PG258Q comes with a smaller 25″ display instead of a 27″ display. So, really, you’re paying a premium for the ASUS ROG branding.
It is a G-Sync monitor and like the other options on this list it comes with a 1080P display and a 1ms response time as well. But, until the price comes down to match the other options on this list, we recommend choosing one of the monitors listed above.
I guess, technically, we could have merged the ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q and this ASUS ROG Strix XG258Q into the same section like we did for the Alienware and ViewSonic series monitors at the top of this post. And, that’s because the PG258Q and the XG258Q are essentially the same monitor with one being a G-Sync monitor and the other being a FreeSync monitor.
But, with ASUS dubbing this monitor the ROG Strix, it appears as if they’re trying to separate the marketing of the two displays… so, we’ll separate them as well.
However, just like the PG258Q gets docked points for its high price, the XG258Q also loses points for being the most expensive FreeSync monitor on this list. At right around ~$420, the XG258Q comes in at ~$60-$120 more expensive than the other FreeSync options listed above. So, unless you’re willing to pay extra for the ROG brand name, you’d probably be better off going with a different 240Hz FreeSync monitor.
Finally, we have BenQ’s XL2540. While the specs on the XL2540 are good, the one downside is the fact that it doesn’t come with a variable refresh rate technology. BenQ claims that neither FreeSync or G-Sync are needed on a 240Hz refresh rate monitor because, at that refresh rate, it is so fast to where screen tearing won’t be noticeable. And, there may be some truth to that…
However, despite not having either G-Sync or FreeSync, the XL2540 still comes in at ~$420. So, at that price, you can either go with much cheaper options that have FreeSync on them, or pay a little more for an option that has G-Sync on it. And, ultimately, that’s why, in our opinion, the BenQ XL2540 is the least attractive option of the 240Hz monitors on this list.
Is A 240Hz Monitor Worth It?
Not everyone will need (or want) a 240Hz monitor. At the moment, there are a ton of niche markets within the gaming monitor market. You’ve got ultrawide gaming monitors,..
We’ve rated and reviewed seven of the best 17-inch laptops currently available. So, if you’re looking for a laptop for gaming, work, or casual use, that has a bigger screen, check out our recommendations below.
Whether you’re looking for a high-end gaming laptop, or a professional workstation laptop, or even a budget-friendly laptop for casual use, one thing you’ll need to decide on is how big of a screen you want. Right now, the two most common screen sizes for laptops are 15.6-inches and 17.3-inches. If you’re someone who prefers larger screens, you’re in luck, because in this guide, we’re going to take a look at some of the best 17-inch laptops currently available.
If you’re looking for a certain type of laptop, or you are working with a specific budget, the table below shows our top picks for the best 17″ laptops across a few different categories. We’ve chosen the best 17-inch laptop for gaming, the best workstation laptop with a 17-inch screen, the best value option, and the best budget 17-inch laptop.
If you’re looking for a high-end laptop for gaming that has a 17-inch display, you might want to check out the HP Omen X. The Omen X sports a 1080P resolution screen that comes with a whopping 120Hz refresh rate NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology.
With a GTX 1080 graphics card included in the Omen X, it will easily be able to run games at max settings with high enough framerates to take advantage of the 120Hz refresh rate. And, the laptop also comes with an Intel Core i7-7820HK processor and 16GB of DDR4 memory. For storage, the Omen X comes with a 1TB hard drive and a 256GB SSD as well.
The Omen X was out runner-up pick for the best GTX 1080 laptop overall, but our top pick, the ASUS ROG GX501 was a 15.6″ laptop. So, in terms of the best 17-inch gaming laptop out there, the Omen X is probably it.
If you’re a professional who needs a high-end workstation-level laptop for graphics design or other intensive work and you want a larger screen, you might want to check out the Lenovo ThinkPad P71.
The P71 doesn’t lack for high-end hardware, as it comes with an Intel Xeon E3-1505M processor, an NVIDIA Quadro P3000 graphics card, 32GB of DDR4 memory, a 1TB hard drive, and a 512GB SSD.
And, perhaps the most stand-out featur eof the ThinkPad P71 is the fact that it comes with a 4K resolution screen. So, not only are you getting a larger screen with the 17.3″ display, but you’re also getting four times the pixels over a standard 1080P laptop.
The ThinkPad P71 is a bit pricey, coming in at just over $3,000, but if you’re a professional in need of a powerful 4K laptop and you have the budget to accommodate it, the P71 is worth considering.
In our opinion, the HP Omen 17 offers the best value for anyone who is trying to juggle a moderate budget with the need for a high-end option. The HP Omen 17 comes with a 17.3″ 1080P display that has a 144Hz refresh rate and comes with NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology.
While the HP Omen 17 doesn’t quite have as powerful of a graphics card as the HP Omen X does, the GTX 1060 that it comes with should be strong enough to allow you to play the majority of games on max settings with high framerates.
Even if you’re not a gamer, the HP Omen 17 would be worth considering as it also comes with an Intel Core i7-8750H processor, 16GB of DDR4 memory, a 1TB hard drive, and a 128GB SSD. However, you could save a bit of money by opting for the ASUS VivoBook that is listed in the Honorable Mentions section below.
If you’re looking for a high-end gaming experience, especially in competitive titles, you might be better off with one of the options above because of their higher refresh rate and G-Sync technology. However, if you want a 4K laptop for the higher screen resolution, the Dell Inspiron 4K is your best bet among GTX 1060 laptops.
Need a more affordable laptop that comes with a larger 17.3″ display? We’ve essentially made two budget-friendly picks in this guide: this Dell Inspiron laptop and the Acer Aspire laptop mentioned in the Honorable Mention section below.
If you’re looking for an ultra-cheap laptop, the Acer Aspire comes in at under $600. However, in terms of power it can’t quite stack up to this Dell Inpiron model which comes in right at ~$900.
This Dell Inspiron model comes with a 1080P display, an Intel Core i7-8750H processor, 8GB of RAM (which can easily be upgraded to 16GB in the future), a GTX 1050 Ti graphics card, a 128GB SSD, and a 1TB hard drive.
While this laptop isn’t as well-suited for gaming as some of the other options above, the combination of the 8750H and the GTX 1050 Ti will be good enough to play most games on medium-to-higher settings with a good framerate. And, if you’re not a gamer, the high-end processor and 8GB of memory should be more than enough for your needs.
Another option you have if you’re looking for a 17-inch gaming laptop is the ASUS ROG Strix Scar. We chose the Scar as our top pick for the best GTX 1070 laptop on the market, but in terms of price-to-performance, we still think the HP Omen X is the better overall option for gamers.
The main difference between the HP Omen X and the ROG Strix Scar is the fact that the Scar comes with a less-powerful GTX 1070 graphics card and the HP Omen X comes with the more powerful GTX 1080.
And, while the difference between the 1080 and 1070 in terms of in-game performance won’t be too significant on a 1080P display (which both the Scar and the Omen X have), the fact that the HP Omen X comes in at only about ~$100 more than the ROG Strix Scar makes the Omen X, in our opinion, the better value option out of the two.
So, while either option would be a good choice for gaming, if you need as much in-game performance as possible, we’d recommend the HP Omen X for just a little more.
If you’re looking for a lightweight 17-inch laptop that won’t break the bank, you might want to check out ASUS’ VivoBook. The biggest selling point of the VivoBook is its lightweight and thin design. However, its no slouch in terms of performance as well…
It comes with a 1080P display, an Intel Core i7-8550U processor, 16GB of DDR4 memory, a GTX 1050 4GB graphics card, a 256GB SSD, and a 1TB hard drive.
While the GTX 1050 graphics card won’t be enough to max out more demanding games on the 1080P display, it should be able to run non-demanding games on max settings, as well as play more graphics-intensive games on lower-to-medium settings.
Although, if you are looking for a better CPU-GPU combination, the Dell Inspiron listed above would be a better option while costing quite a bit less.
If you’re working with a tight budget, but you still want to get a laptop with a 17-inch display, then you might want to consider the Acer Aspire. This laptop comes in at a little under $600 and comes with a 1080P display, an Intel Core i5-7200U CPU, 8GB of DDR4 memory, and a GeForce 940MX GPU.
For storage, this laptop comes with a 256GB SSD, but there is no secondary mechanical hard drive.
If you’re a gamer, you can expect this Acer Aspire laptop to run non-demanding games on lower-to-medium settings, but it probably won’t hold up for most demanding games. You can also check out our guide on the best gaming laptops under $500 for more affordable options, although, you won’t find a 17-inch display on those laptops.
Check Out These 17-Inch Laptops for Larger Screen Options
If you’re in the market for a new laptop and you want as big of a screen as possible, the 17.3-inch laptops listed above are worthy options to consider. So, whether you’re..
Should choose a dedicated graphics card or a processor with integrated graphics on it? In this guide, we’ll go over the differences between both options so that you’ll have a better idea of which option will work best for you.
If you’ve noticed in this post’s title, I capitalized YOU. That wasn’t a typo and that wasn’t in an attempt to make it look like I was shouting the word ‘you’. Rather, it was to place emphasis on the fact that the biggest determining factor in whether or not you should get a dedicated graphics card or integrated graphics will all come down to you and your own needs and your budget.
Sure, dedicated GPUs are typically more powerful than integrated graphics, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that a dedicated GPU will be a better option for you.
So, in this guide, we’ll discuss what dedicated graphics are, what integrated graphics are, the differences between them, and who both GPU options make sense for. So, whether you’re looking to build or buy a new PC or laptop, this guide will help you determine whether or not you should be looking at ‘discrete’ graphics cards (another name for ‘dedicated’ graphics cards) or graphics that are integrated onto the processor (CPU).
A CPU (or central processing unit) in a computer is responsible for executing the processes (through calculations) that are necessary to make your computer work.
A GPU (or graphics processing unit) works similarly to a CPU, except it mainly handles the processing of graphics-related data and instructions.
Integrated graphics refers to the scenario in which you find both a CPU and a GPU included on the same chip. So, for instance, if you choose a processor that has integrated graphics on it, that processor will be able to handle both normal CPU processes and GPU processes.
What is A Dedicated Graphics Card?
A dedicated graphics card comes completely separate from your CPU. The graphics card houses the GPU which then can be used to process graphics-related data and instructions separate from your CPU.
Discrete graphics cards also come with their own memory in the form of VRAM (video RAM, or video random access memory), which gives the dedicated GPU quick access to relevant image data. As a comparison, integrated graphics do not have a dedicated set of memory to pull image data from, but, rather, use the system’s memory to pull image data from.
Integrated GPU vs Dedicated GPU: What’s the Difference?
The biggest drawback of integrated graphics is that, by placing both a CPU and GPU on the same chip, one (or both) of the processors will be limited. Or, in other words, you cannot place both a CPU and GPU on the same chip without limiting one (or both) of their potential processing power.
And, while most modern processors come with integrated graphics on them, it is usually the integrated GPU that is minimalized so as to not affect the CPU’s potential performance.
However, a dedicated graphics card has its own PCB, memory (VRAM), and cooling solution, and, as a result, is not as limited in its potential power. And, moving the responsibility of computing graphics-related data from the integrated graphics on your processor to a dedicated GPU will help free up resources for your CPU to use.
So, a dedicated graphics card—depending on how powerful of a GPU it has on it—will not only provide more GPU power, but it will also reduce the workload on your main processor as well. And, both of those things will help your computer perform better.
Of course, just because a dedicated graphics card will help a computer perform better doesn’t necessarily mean that every computer user should opt for a system with a dedicated GPU in it. In fact, integrated graphics are becoming more powerful and, for basic computing, they can offer more than enough power to accommodate the average user.
So, in the next two sections, we’ll discuss who dedicated graphics cards make sense for and who integrated graphics makes sense for.
Who Should Get A Dedicated Graphics Card?
The two main determining factors on whether or not you should get a dedicated graphics card are:
What your total budget is for the system you are looking to buy
The kinds of tasks and programs you are looking to run on your system
So, with those two factors in mind, let’s take a look at who a dedicated graphics card would make sense for…
1. Serious Gamers Who Want A Desktop (Either to Buy One or Build One) And Who Have A Decent-Sized Budget
If you’re a serious gamer and you want to play your favorite games on the highest settings possible with as high of a framerate as possible, then you’ll likely want to either purchase a pre-built gaming desktop that has a dedicated graphics card inside of it, or build a new computer and include a dedicated graphics card in your part list.
The good news is that, for 1080P gaming, you can build a gaming computer for as low as $400-$500 that can accommodate a dedicated graphics card and that will outperform a system that relies on integrated graphics.
Or, you can buy a pre-built gaming desktop for about ~$500-$600 (or higher) that will offer similar performance.
The bottom line, though, is that if gaming performance is your main concern and you have at least $400-$500 to spend on a system, you should probably be going with a dedicated graphics card.
2. Serious Gamers Who Want A Gaming Laptop and Who Have A Moderate Budget
As laptops are more expensive on a spec-for-spec basis than their desktop counterparts, most cheap gaming laptops come with integrated graphics in them. And, if you don’t have a lot of money to spend and you aren’t playing more demanding games, integrated graphics on a laptop can be serviceable.
However, if you need a laptop and you want it to be able to handle your favorite games on higher settings with higher framerates, you’re going to want to choose a gaming laptop that has a dedicated graphics card in it.
Fortunately, you can find a solid gaming laptop under $1,000 that will come with a dedicated graphics card in it and that will be able to play most of today’s top games at at least medium settings with a solid framerate.
3. Professionals Who Do Graphics-Related Work
If you’re a professional that does graphics-related work (graphics design, animation, video editing, etc.), or, if you’re just some who does those things for fun, you’ll likely want to ensure that you get a dedicated graphics card, as well, because those types of tasks and programs can be difficult to carry out on integrated graphics.
Who Should Use Integrated Graphics?
Nowadays, integrated graphics can be powerful enough for certain users. The scenarios and use-cases where integrated graphics makes sense are as follows:
1. Non-Gamers Who Are Looking for A New System for Basic Computing
If all you want is a computer or laptop that can handle things like browsing the internet, sending emails, or watching videos, going with a system that opts for integrated graphics is not a bad idea. In fact, if that is all you want out of your system, you would end up spending more money than is necessary by choosing a system that has a dedicated graphics card in it.
2. Budget-Oriented Gamers Who Want A Desktop and Who Have A Tight Budget
If you are a gamer, but you have a really tight budget to work with to get a new desktop system, you may not be able to afford a dedicated graphics card, in which case, you’ll be forced to use the integrated graphics that come on your processor.
Fortunately, if you’re willing to build your own computer, you can put together a system for around ~$300-$400 that comes with a processor that has integrated graphics that are powerful enough for entry-level gaming. That means you’ll be able to play games like Leauge of Legends, Dota 2, Rocket League, etc. with no problems. And, for more demanding games, you will at least be able to play some of them on lower settings.
If you don’t want to build your own computer, you can still find an affordable pre-built desktop that will feature a similar level of integrated graphics.
3. Gamers Who Want A Laptop, But Who Don’t Have At Least A Moderate Budget
For gamers who require a laptop, but who don’t have a large budget, integrated graphics will be your only option. Unfortunately, you shouldn’t expect great gaming performance out of a cheap laptop that utilizes integrated graphics.
However, if all you really want to do is play non-demanding games like League of Legends, Dota 2, or Rocket League, you can probably get by with an extreme budget laptop with integrated graphics on it until you can afford a higher-end option.
Are Integrated Graphics or A Dedicated Graphics Card the Better Option for You?
The bottom line is that, while a dedicated graphics card will typically provide more GPU power than integrated graphics will, the reality is that some users will be better off with integrated graphics if A) they don’t have the budget to accommodate a dedicated graphics card, or B) they will only be using their system for tasks that don’t require the extra GPU power that a dedicated graphics card will provide.
Ultimately, if you’re on the fence between whether you need a dedicated graphics card, or you can get by with integrated graphics card, the points outlined in this post should help you determine which option is best for your needs and budget.
If you’re in the market for a new ultrawide monitor, but you don’t have an enormous budget, in this guide, we’ve compared six afforable ultrawide displays to help you find an option that suits your needs.
We recently took a look at the best ultrawide monitors overall and today we’re going to look at the top options under $400. The market for ultrawide monitors is similar to the market for G-Sync monitors… the average price of an ultrawide display is fairly expensive. However, even the cheapest G-Sync monitor will set you back ~$350, whereas you can get an ultrawide monitor for under $200.
And, there are a handful of sub-$300 ultrawide options out there as well (something you can’t find with G-Sync monitors.) One thing that is surprising about the lower-end of the ultrawide market, though, is that it is almost entirely dominated by LG. In the sub-$400 price range for ultrawide panels, there are only two options from non-LG manufacturers. And, while we did list four options from LG below, the reality is that they actually have quite a few more ultrawide displays available in the same range.
In any case, if you’re looking for a cheap ultrawide monitor, we listed six options that all come in under $400 below (with one option coming in below $200). So, if you just don’t want to spend quite as much to get one of the higher-end options out there, one of the displays below should work for you.
A Quick Look at the Top Ultrawide Monitors Under $400
In order to narrow the selection down a bit further, we selected our picks for the top four ultrawide monitors under $400. We’ve made our pick for the best option for gamers, the option with the largest screen, the best value option, and the cheapest ultrawide monitor currently available.
*To read more about each of these affordable ultrawide monitors, click on “Read Review »” to jump to our overview on that specific display. You can also scroll down on this post to see our Honorable Mention picks.
We chose the LG 29UM68-P as our top pick for the best cheap ultrawide display under $400. It actually comes in at just under $300 and it offers a huge 29″ screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio and a resolution of 2560 x 1080.
It does only have a 60Hz refresh rate, but there really aren’t any budget ultrawide displays that come with a refresh rate higher than 60Hz. It does, however, come with AMD’s FreeSync technology, which means that it will pair perfectly with an affordable AMD graphics card to deliver a smooth in-game experience.
If you have a little more to spend, you could also check out our first Honorable Mention, the LG 34UM69G-B, as it offers essentially the same exact specs as this 29UM68-P comes with, except that the LG 34UM69G-B comes with a 34″ display instead of a 29″ display. But, it is also ~$75 more expensive as well.
Ultimately, we felt that the LG 29UM68-P offered a great combination of features for gamers and with AMD’s FreeSync technology included, it would pair well with a budget gaming PC build (with an AMD graphics card in it) to deliver an excellent 1080P gaming experience.
If you’re more of a casual gamer, or you just want an affordable ultrawide monitor for other purposes (work, design, programming, etc.), and you don’t necessarily need a display that has AMD’s FreeSync technology, then you might want to consider Acer’s CB351C.
The CB351C comes with the largest screen size out of all of the other options on this list. And, it’s also cheaper than both the LG 29UM68-P and the LG 34UM69G-B. Along with its huge 35″ display, it also comes with a 21:9 ultrawide aspect ratio with a total resolution of 2560 x 1080.
Like the other options on this list, it does come with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. And, while that is not ideal for gaming, considering the fact that the majority of gamers out there are playing on 1080P 60Hz displays, there would be nothing wrong with using this monitor to game on.
However, for the same price, you can land an affordable 144Hz monitor. It won’t have an ultrawide screen, but if you’re a hardcore gamer, that might suit you better.
In any case, if screen size is your main goal, the Acer CB351C not only has you covered there, but at a little under $250, it is a very affordable display as well.
Another option that we like, mainly because of its price, is the LG 29UM59-A. It comes with a 29″ screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio, a 60Hz refresh rate, and a total 2560 x 1080 resolution.
On a feature and specification basis, both of the options above offer the same, or better specs and features. The Acer CB351C has it beat in screen size (35″ vs. 29″) and the LG 29UM68-P comes with AMD’s FreeSync technology.
However, where the 29UM59-A stands out is the price it comes in at. At just a little under $220, the monitor costs ~$20 less than the Acer CB351C and ~$80 less than the 29UM68-P. If it were us, we’d probably just pay the $20 extra to get the larger Acer CB351C. But, if you need to save as much money as possible, or if you don’t want quite as large of a display, the LG 29UM59-A will allow you to save a little bit of money.
If you didn’t think you could get an ultrawide display for under $200, think again. For about ~$175 you can land the LG 25UM58-P. It’s a bit smaller than the other options on this list, but it comes in a 25″ screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio and a total resolution of 2560 x 1080.
So, in terms of specifications, it’s very similar to the LG 29UM59-A listed above, but just with a smaller screen size. My guess, though, is that if you are looking at ultrawide displays, that screen size is important to you. So, this 25″ ultrawide display may not be the best option for you.
However, if you do want an ultrawide panel and you don’t have over $200 to spend on one, you won’t find a more affordable 21:9 monitor than the LG 29UM59-A.
It may have been a better idea to include the LG 34UM69G-B as our top pick for this list’s best option for gaming. It is essentially the same panel as the LG 29UM68-P as it comes with a 21:9 aspect ratio and a 2560 x 1080 resolution. It also comes with AMD’s FreeSync technology as well.
It also comes with a larger 34″ screen size and a slightly higher refresh rate (75Hz). However, it does cost ~$80 more than the LG 29UM68-P. So, while it is a better overall option for gaming because of the larger screen and slightly higher refresh rate, we felt the price difference is enough to justify recommending the LG 29UM68-P over it instead.
Of course, if you have the extra money to spend and you’re looking for an ultrawide monitor for gaming, the LG 34UM69G-B would likely be the best option for you.
Finally, we have the ASUS Designo MX299Q. While it isn’t a bad option per se, it doesn’t really offer anything that warrants recommending it over the other options on this list.
And, the main reason for that is the price it comes in at. At ~$350 it is the second most expensive ultrawide display on this list despite not really offering any specs or features that help it stand out over its lower-priced competitors. It does come with a 29″ screen that has a 21:9 aspect ratio and features a 2560 x 1080 resolution. But, the LG 29UM59-A offers the same exact specs and comes in at ~$130 cheaper. And, the Acer CB351C offers the same specs, but with a bigger screen, and comes in at ~$110 cheaper.
The one thing that the ASUS Designo MX299Q does have that none of the other options on this list come with are built-in speakers. Of course, at the ~$110-$130 premium it comes in over the options mentioned above, you can easily find a set of speakers that will offer a better sound quality.
So, unless the MX299Q drops in price significantly, we’d recommend one of the options above instead.
Is A Sub-$400 Ultrawide Monitor Worth It?
While the average price for ultrawide displays is fairly high, there are some budget-friendly options out there. And, in this guide we’ve compared six cheap ultrawide monitors under $400 to help you find an affordable option that will suit your needs. So, if you’re in the market for an ultrawide monitor that won’t break the bank, one of the displays listed above should work for you.
If having as much screen space as possible is your cup of tea, in this guide, we’ve taken a look at seven of the best ultrawide monitors for 2019. So, if you’re in the market for a new ultrawide display, check out our recommendations below.
Now, I’m more of a multi-monitor guy myself, but newer ultrawide monitor options have me wondering whether I’d be better off trading in my triple monitor setup for an ultrawide display. Of course, there aren’t any ultrawide monitors out there that can go quite as wide as a triple monitor setup, but with options like the Samsung CHG90, you can at least get what is essentially two monitors merged into one. And, while the CHG90 is the first of its kind, more and more users (especially gamers) are opting for an ultrawide display.
So, if you’re someone who likes the idea of having extra horizontal screen space and you’re in the market for a new monitor (whether for gaming or other uses), check out our recommendations below for the best ultrawide monitors currently available.
Our quick-look table below showcases our top picks for the best ultrawide monitors. We’ve selected four different displays, including our top overall pick, our runner-up pick, our value pick, and our budget pick.
*To read more about each of these ultrawide monitors, click on “Read Review »” to skip to the overview we’ve written on that specific display. You can also scroll further down in this post to see our Honorable Mention selections.
While I’m pretty comfortable with my triple monitor setup, if I were to ever ditch it for a single monitor, I’d do so for Samsung’s CHG90. The CHG90 offers an incredible 49″ cruved display in a 32:9 aspect ratio with a 3840 x 1080 resolution. So, essentially, it’s two standard 1080P monitors merged together.
The CHG90, like other high-end ultrawide monitors, doesn’t come cheap. You can land the CHG90 for just under $900. And, one hard pill to swallow for anyone who might be considering the CHG90 might be that, for that ~$900, you only get a panel that comes with a 1080P vertical resolution.
Other ultrawide monitors in the same price range as the CHG90 (like the ASUS ROG PG348Q listed below), feature 1440P vertical resolutions. However, the extra width certainly adds to the cost, and the CHG90 also features a 144Hz refresh rate and comes with AMD’s FreeSync technology.
So, while its vertical pixel count isn’t ideal for a monitor in this price range, it definitely has other features that will make up for it. In fact, the 1080P vertical resolution helps it in this case, because that will put less demand on the graphics card that you pair with it, thus allowing it to reach the framerates necessary to take advantage of the higher refresh rate.
Of course, as it is an AMD FreeSync monitor, it will need to be paired with a newer AMD graphics card in order to take advantage of AMD’s variable refresh rate technology.
Ultimately, if you’re a competitive gamer who needs the performance advantage that a 144Hz monitor can offer you at an affordable price, this monitor—along with an AMD graphics card—will be an excellent option for your needs.
Our runner-up pick will probably be an even better option than the CHG90 for certain users. For starters, the ASUS ROG PG348Q comes with a higher vertical resolution than the CHG90 (it’s total pixel count is 3440 x 1440) and, instead of coming with AMD’s FreeSync technology, it opts for NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology as well. (That means that you can only use an NVIDIA graphics card with this monitor.)
However, the PG348Q is a smaller display overall. It’s a 34″ screen that sports a 21:9 aspect ratio. So, not quite nearly as long as the CHG90. It also comes in at about ~$50 more expensive, too. And, it has a slower refresh rate than the CHG90 as well (100Hz vs 144Hz)
And, while these factors dock it a bit for us, the truth is that there are going to be users out there that will prefer either the PG348Q’s higher vertical resolution, or the fact that it comes with G-Sync instead of FreeSync.
So, while we like the CHG90 better, there are definitely arguments to be made for opting for the PG348Q over it. And, if that’s the route you want to go, it will definitely be a good choice. It should be noted, though, that the Acer Predator X34 (our first Honorable Mention) offers essentially the same specs as the PG348Q and should probably be considered along with the PG348Q before you make your decision.
If you don’t really need a high-end gaming option, or you just don’t want to spend over $600-$700 to get one, the LG 29UM68-P comes in at a much more affordable price. At just under $300, the 29UM68-P is a 29″ monitor with a 21:9 ultrawide display.
It features a 2560 x 1080 screen resolution and it comes with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. And, while it’s refresh rate is nothing to write home about, it does come with AMD’s FreeSync technology, which means that when paired with an AMD graphics card, you will get a very smooth in-game experience.
So, while LG 29UM68-P may not be a “high-end” gaming monitor, it is still a solid option for gamers who don’t quite have enough to spend on a more expensive option, but who still want an ultrawide monitor nonetheless.
Speaking of less expensive ultrawide monitors, LG has another option that is even more affordable than the 29UM68-P. And, that is the LG 25UM58-P. The LG 25UM58-P sports a 25″ screen size with a 2560 x 1080 resolution (21:9 aspect ratio).
It also comes with a standard 60Hz refresh rate and, unfortunately, it doesn’t come with AMD’s FreeSync technology. So, compared to the 29UM68-P, the LG 25UM58-P comes with a smaller screen and lacks a variable refresh rate technology.
However, the main selling point of the 25UM58-P is the fact that it comes in at right around ~$175. So, if you don’t need FreeSync, or you just don’t have much more than $200 to spend on your monitor, the 25UM58-P is a nice affordable ultrawide monitor that will match your budget.
At the high-end of the gaming monitor market, it always seems like ASUS and Acer are battling each other. Whether that’s for the best 1440P 144Hz monitor, or here with the best gaming-specific ultrawide monitors (although, the Samsung CHG90 is definitely in the conversation as well).
In terms of specifications, Acer’s X34 ultrawide monitor matches up almost identically with ASUS’ ROG PG348Q. Both monitors sport a 21:9 ultrawide aspect ratio and have 34″ curved displays with a total ratio of 3440 x 1440.
And, both feature a 100Hz refresh rate and NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology. So, really, you can flip a coin between the two because both of these monitors will serve you well if you have a large budget and you want a high-end ultrawide gaming monitor.
BenQ is another popular monitor manufacturer that has come up with a high-end ultrawide curved gaming monitor. Their EX3501R has pretty much identical specs to both the ASUS ROG PG348Q and the Acer X34.
However, instead of featuring NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology, BenQ’s EX3501R instead opts for AMD’s FreeSync technology. And, as a result, it comes in at ~$100-$150 less than ASUS’ and Acer’s similar offerings.
Of course, just like how you’d be wasting money if you paired either the Acer or ASUS monitor with an AMD graphics card, the opposite is true with the EX3501R. So, if you are planning on getting an NVIDIA GPU, or you already have one, you’ll likely want to consider those options instead.
If you have (or are planning on getting) a high-end AMD graphics card, though, this BenQ ultrawide monitor would be a better fit for you.