The concept that the spiritual journey´s destination is just an illusion.In Buddhism, the stated goal is enlightenment. I like to use the word “awakening” because it implies continuous development. When Siddhartha Gautama became the Buddha, he did not stop growing, learning, awakening.
I want to make a few comments about something I wrote in the last post:
It seems to me that there is no other religious philosophy other than Buddhism that has such a concept where there is absolutely no separation between the ordinary person and the ultimate reality. You cannot become God, Jesus, the Prophet – you can be Buddha. Here, the ultimate reality is everything.
When we talk about an “ultimate reality” in Buddhism, we’re comprehending a different understanding of the term that that of other religions or spiritual philosophies. An “ultimate reality” is not any one thing. It is everything. There is no separation because we are living the ultimate reality right now. How we perceive it is the question.
You may read that emptiness is the ultimate reality. That is misleading. Emptiness is the “ultimate” nature of things, meaning that all things are empty, including emptiness. But it does not mean that emptiness itself is anything like a force, or substitute for some mystical being. There is no creator god in Buddhism. Buddha was not divine, nor was he was prophet. He was an itinerant philosopher and meditation teacher. To compare Buddha with the others is a bit misleading as well.
I’m sure most of you caught my drift when you read the post. Just wanted to make sure…
In Nagarjuna’s Philosophy, K. Venkata Ramanan says that it is through realizing that even the subtlest things are not ultimate in reality that one becomes free of clinging. The philosophy of sunyata seeks to bring about this realization by laying bare the inconsistencies to which one is misled into thinking things are ultimate.
So, in Buddhism there is no ultimate reality. At the same time, all of reality is the ultimate reality.
Ramanan quotes Nagarjuna:
The ultimately true nature of the Buddha and the ultimately true nature of all things are in truth but one reality, not two, not divided. This ultimate reality is unmade, it will never be other than what it always is.
Reality is. Just is. Unmade. Indeterminable. Non-dual. The ultimate reality is a whole, the whole of everything. That is why everything is Buddha and anyone can be Buddha.
I am not a Zen Buddhist but I am a follower, more or less, of one of its greatest teachers, Dogen, who introduced Zen (Ch’an) to Japan in the form of the Soto school. He lived during the Kamakura period (1192–1333), the Medieval era in which “original awakening” (hongaku) was a core concept in Japanese Buddhism.
Tibetan monk staring at Buddha.
Original awakening refers to the fundamental nature of enlightenment native to all human beings and the external world, and is closely related to the idea of Buddha-nature. Some time back, I ran across this description of original awakening which I think is pretty good: “[it] means that everything, without exception and without alteration, is already full-blown Buddha. Ignorance? Buddha. Wisdom? Buddha. The leaf, the blossom…” You, me, our enemy, friends, the wind, mountains… all Buddhas.
A famous Zen anecdote, “Mazu’s ‘Mind is Buddha,” goes like this:
Damei once asked Master Mazu, “What is buddha?” Mazu answered, “Mind is buddha.” Commenting on this, master Wumen said, “If you can at once grasp “it,” you are wearing buddha clothes, eating buddha food, speaking buddha words, and living buddha life; you are a buddha yourself.”
Everything, everyone is Buddha. It seems to me that there is no other religious philosophy other than Buddhism that has such a concept where there is absolutely no separation between the ordinary person and the ultimate reality. You cannot become God, Jesus, the Prophet – you can be Buddha.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states. “Zen aims at a perfection of personhood.” This is it exactly. Buddha is not a god or a psychedelic spiritual being but an ordinary person who has realized wisdom within. A Buddha has perfected his or her person so that thoughts and actions are based squarely on positive virtues. And it goes further than that, a Buddha is a whole person.
If you want more detailed information about this concept and its development, see these posts.
In my less than educated (I am not a Dogen scholar) original enlightenment was the notion underlining Dogen’s concept of the “oneness of practice and enlightenment” (shusho-itto or shusho ichi-nyo). In his essay, Bendowa (“On Practicing the Way of Buddhas”), Dogen says,
“The view that practice and enlightenment are not one is a non-Buddhist view. In the Buddha-dharma they are one. Inasmuch as practice is based on enlightenment, the practice of a beginner is entirely that of original enlightenment. Therefore, in giving the instruction for practice, a Zen teacher should advise his or her disciples no t to seek enlightenment apart from practice, for practice itself is original enlightenment. Because it is already enlightenment of practice, there is no end to enlightenment; because it is already practice of enlightenment, there is no beginning to practice.”
When we factor in the inseparability of all things, non-duality, then “oneness of practice and enlightenment” is fairly easy to understand. “Oneness of practice and enlightenment” is a unique and original concept, as well as a further development of the traditional Buddhist view that meditation is the sole way that leads to the transcendence of suffering and to awakening. Meditation is the heart of Buddhism. Without it, there is no Buddhism.
Having Buddhahood within does us no good unless we make an effort to actualize it. Meditation is our main tool for this endeavor.
Francis H. Cook, Associate Professor at the University of California Riverside and author of a number of books on Buddhism, makes this important point about Dogen’s concept:
“[The] relationship between practice and attainment as Dogen understood it: practice is not a means to enlightenment or attainment, but is that which measures, or actualizes, one’s already existent enlightenment. In fact, says Dogen, zazen [meditation] practice is enlightenment.”*
While Dogen was adamant about meditation being the essence of Buddha-dharma, we should keep in mind that “practice” is not always limited to sitting. What we do after we get up from the meditation cushion is also practice. It is crucial that we apply the realizations we gain from meditation to our daily life. Good behavior is a reflection of sincere practice. If the aim is to perfect our humanness, to become better people, daily life is where we find the fruits of our labor. Meditation is not a means to escape the world but rather to see the world as it truly is, without illusion.
When Buddha awakened beneath the Bodhi Tree, it was not some mysical experience, rather the culmination of years of effort. Awakening is a process. Meditation was the process the Buddha used to realize the Buddhahood of all things. Meditation is the practice we practice in the midst of original awakening.
“[Buddha] said, at this moment all beings and I awaken together. So it was not just him. It was all the universe. He touched the earth. ‘As earth is my witness. Seeing this morning star, all things and I awaken together.‘”
– Jane Hirshfield, poet
– – – – – – – – – –
Enlightenment in Dogen’s Zen, Francis H. Cook, The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, Volume6, 1983, Number 1
Cook also translated the passage from Bendowa
Today’s entry incorporates material from several previous posts.
In “The Dalai Lama: A Policy of Kindness”edited by Sidney Piburn, the Dalai Lama is quoted as saying,
“Buddhism does not accept a theory of God, or a creator. According to Buddhism, one’s own actions are the creator, ultimately. Some people say that, from a certain angle, Buddhism is not a religion but rather a science of mind.”
Several times during recent years, the Dalai Lama has also expressed his dissatisfaction with religion as a whole, suggesting that “the time has come to find a way of thinking about spirituality and ethics beyond religion altogether.”
Well, religion has never been adequate, and Buddhism was never intended to be a religion. Buddha was not a religious figure. He wasn’t a god, a miracle worker, a faith healer, nor was he a prophet like Isaiah or Muhammad, or a law-bringer in the way Moses was – he was a meditation teacher, an itinerant philosopher. The spiritual tradition he belonged to, the sramanas, was not a religious movement, it was outside of religion, and it seems the Buddha was critical of the established religion of his day, with its reliance on ritual, incantations, and prophecies, and he rejected the authority of the priests.
The Buddha’s message was not religious, either. Buddha-dharma says, everyone has problems, and if you want to learn how to deal with your problems more effectively and perhaps even overcome the sufferings your problems bring, then once or twice a day, sit down, be still, and calm your mind. That’s not a particularly religious message. It’s a very practical message. After all, what is the best thing to do when we have a problem? Rush out willy-nilly, higgly-piggly, and try to affect a solution? No, it’s best to sit down, think the problem through, calmly, maybe analyze the causes for the problem, and then work out a solution. It’s the same principal in Buddha-dharma, only we are dealing with deeper levels of the mind.
The Buddha did not direct the attention of his followers toward some higher, holier being but rather toward their own human nature, their inner-being, their mind. Buddha was not concerned about the existence of gods, or speculation about how the world was made. He was concerned only with the question of how to solve human problems, how to relieve suffering.
And he asked his followers not to worship him. He expressly forbade them from revering his relics. That’s why for several centuries no representations of the Buddha were used, only images of a footprint, an empty seat, the Wheel of Dharma, a Bodhi leaf, and so on. But human beings, being what they are just couldn’t help themselves and made Buddhism a religion and Buddha a god.
Non-Buddhists, when trying to get a handle on what Buddhism is about, are often confused because they try to analyze Buddha-dharma from a religious perspective. They are unable to fathom the idea of not having a supreme being to rely on and answer prayers. This is perfectly natural, but not helpful.
Buddhism begins with the premise that religion is not adequate. Buddhism has always been beyond religion. Buddhism does not really fit any category we have in the West. It has religious elements; it is a discipline, a philosophy, a way of life, a way of mind, a path, a Way but most of all, Buddhism is beyond religion.
It’s been a while. Since I began this blog in 2010 this is the longest I’ve gone without posting. I’m on hiatus, and I plan to stay that way.
No particular reason. Just don’t have much to say.
On the health front, the latest round of tests show that my cancer has not changed. It seems to be in a holding pattern right now. Good. What’s not so good is the lymphedema or swelling in my legs, which, like metastatic cancer, is incurable. I’ll spare you the details and just say that the fluid has reached both legs and greatly inhibits my mobility.
I did want to comment about something today…
One of the things we see in Trump’s abnormal behavior that doesn’t seem to get talked about a lot is the way he judges people. I suppose it gets lost in the nastiest of his jibes. But when he calls someone a “slime ball,” “crooked,” or “lying,” he’s judging a person’s character, their worth. Judgments of this sort stem from negative emotions and mental tendencies. It is not the way for a responsible adult to behave, and furthermore, it sets a bad example for adults and ‘younger people. It is just one of the many ways in which Trump’s behavior is inappropriate for a person occupying the highest office in the land and another reason why he shouldn’t be there.
“Love is the absence of judgment.” – Dalai Lama
He is trying to define others, define who they are, but what folks with judgmental minds don’t seem to understand is that they are really defining who they are, showing us their true character.
Judging others is a cause for suffering. Not theirs, ours. The Buddha taught that judging others prevents us from discovering truth because the judgmental mind prevents understanding and the accumlation of wisdom.
When we analyze the situation from the standpoint of Buddha-dharma, we find that it links with Nagarjuna’s concept of the “emptiness of views.” In the way I am framing this discussion, judgment, the act of judging others, is nothing more than a view, an opinion.
Venkata Ramanan, in Nagarjuna’s Philosophy, writes,
To abandon [views] is to give up the claim of completeness in regard to what is only fragmentary. [All] views owe [their] being to lack of ‘direct, unimpeded comprehension of the true nature of things…’ This becomes practically the central point in the philosophy of Nagarjuna.’
If we unpack this statement literally, we see that while we may judge someone as a slimeball, but it’s doubful they are a total slimeball. We’re merely expressing our opinion on a fragment of their overall character.
Ramanan goes on to say,
The rejection of views which is an essential point in the philosophy of the Middle Way means that no specific view, being specific, is limitless, and no view, being a view, is ultimate. The ultimate view is not any ‘view.’ ‘Silence is the ultimate truth for the wise.
Trump’s judgmental mind and his unfortunate tweets are just examples of the growing negativity in our society and the way our civil discourse has become so uncivil. We need to turn this around.
We can do our part by recognizing the worthlessness, the emptiness, of judging others, and we can take our cue from Thich Nhat Hanh:
Do your best to practice compassionate listening. Do not listen for the sole purpose of judging, criticizing, or analyzing. Listen only to help the other person express himself and find some relief from his suffering.
I think listening is a more valuable use of our time than criticizing and judging. Don’t you?
50 years ago, this month, The Beatles traveled to northern India to attend an advanced Transcendental Meditation (TM) training course at the ashram of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in Rishikesh. They were joined by their wives and girlfriends, along with a number of friends and associates, including Mike Love (Beach Boys), Donovan, and Mia Farrow.
This was a seminal event in the 1960s because it helped put eastern spirituality on the world map, big time. All the sudden Indian fashion was in vogue (especially Nehru jackets), you started hearing a lot of Eastern flavored songs some featuring the sitar, and it seemed like every rock band now had their own guru (The Who had Meher Baba, The Rascals followed Swami Satchidanada, etc.).
I was a 16-year-old high schooler living in New Orleans. One day the postman delivered the latest edition of Life Magazine and it had a 10-page layout of color photos of the Beatles and everyone taken at the Mararishi’s ashram. It looked really cool. Whether something was cool or not was the barometer by which I judged just about everything. And still do to some extent.
After seeing these photos, I decided almost immediately that I had to find a new religion and philosophy. I suspect the Beatles to Indiae had a similar effect on many others of my generation. George Harrison’s exploration of Indian philosophy and his promotion of Indian music and the sitar (through Ravi Shankar) had already opened the door. The Beatles stay in Rishikesh pushed it wide open. This one event was critical in popularizing Indian culture and meditation around the world.
If you don’t already know, then you should understand that The Beatles impact was not only musical, it was also social.
The philosophy I became most interest in was Buddhism, thanks also to the Beat Generation writers who were heavily into Zen. My high school library didn’t have any books on Buddhism, but it did have a book of quotes by Mahatma Gandhi and that was the first book on Eastern spirituality I read.
Evidently, Ringo didn’t stay at the ashram for long, only 10 days. Paul stayed for about a month, while George and John stayed 6 weeks.
For the Fab Four, the India trip was also about music. Many of the songs on the “White Album” were written there, including one called “Sexy Sadie.” In this song, John satirically expresses the group’s disillusionment with the Maharishi (who claimed to be celibate) after he hit on Mia Farrow. (“Sexy Sadie, what have you done/You made a fool of everyone.”) Now that the Maharishi had revealed himself to be a phony, the Beatles had no use for him. According to Rolling Stone magazine when the Maharishi asked John Lennon why he was leaving the ashram, he said, “Well, if you’re so cosmic, you’ll know why.”
That didn’t end everyone’s interest in Eastern spiritually. Its influence permeated many of John and Paul’s songs afterwards. George continued to study the sitar and he found the teacher A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, under whose guidance began a practice of japa-yoga. Donovan and went on to study with other Indian teachers and eventually developed an interest in Buddhism. Only Mike Love stuck with the Maharishi, embracing TM to this very day.
As for me, I embraced Buddhism and eventually became the world-famous guru, Lama Dharma Rama Ding Dong.
To commemorate the 50-year anniversary of this event, here are some photos (click on them for a larger view). I don’t know if any of them are from that Life article (I wished I’d kept it), but one or two could be. I don’t recall the individual photos in the layout very well. Following the pics are videos of two unreleased Beatles-era John Lennon songs, “The Happy Rishikesh Song” and “Child Of Nature (On the Road to Rishikesh),” the melody Lennon later used for “Jealous Guy”. This video has lyrics and film from the India trip.
Mike Love in the back with white hat, Mia Farrow next the Maharishi, Donovan in yellow (mellow), John, George, Paul, girlfriends, wives.
John, after accidentally dropping his pick into his guitars, tries to shake it out. Happens to me all the time.
Jammin’ with Donovan
Viewing the photo in this size, it looks like they’re using cell phones!
Entrance to the Maharishi’s ashram today.
The Happy Rishikesh Song [long version] - John Lennon - YouTube
The Beatles Child Of Nature (With Lyrics Only) - YouTube