This brilliant cartoon highlights the inequity of coal mining and climate change in general. While there are benefits to be gained by the billionaire, or company, that pollutes - the cost of that is felt by everyone else.
It can be more frequent extreme weather events, more severe droughts, or in this case a destroyed natural wonder. In any case, one or several really rich people benefit while everyone else pays the price.
Since the Australian election some have been worried that Australian voters seem unconcerned about climate change. However, ABC's Vote Compass shows the opposite.
While not many people changed the party they vote for, they are ready for (and expect) more climate action.
How much should we do?The proportion of people saying we should do more has reached an all-time high. Also, the number of undecideds has decreased each election.
Cross-party supportAcross the four biggest parties, each party's supporters want more action rather than less. The highest are Greens (99-0) and Labor (96-0) supporters. A bit further back are Coalition supporters (59-13) and One Nation supporters (40-34).
Whilst some parties seem opposed to more action, every party's supporters think we should be doing more.
What about policies? Renewable energy is immensely popular with 86% of people saying there should be more of it.
The price on carbon emissions was abandoned by the current government. Yet still 68% of people agree with the Greens policy to bring it back.
Electric cars are also a popular idea with 72% saying that the government should do more to increase the number of electric cars in Australia.
What does it mean?Despite the increasing desire for action on climate change, the votes of all the parties remained almost identical to the last election. Perhaps people are sticking with their preferred party, but expecting them to do more.
It's interesting that we seem to be in favour of policies that politicians seems less keen to introduce. Will this be something they notice and begin to act upon? Or could this possible be the effect of political donations by companies that profit from polluting?
Sometimes elections can seem like a high-waste event. Here are some tips to minimise the environmental impact of the day.
Why the flyers?The info on the flyers is important in a federal election. The Senate is a crucial part of our democracy and for a Senate vote to be valid we need to number at least 6 parties in our order of preference.
Who are these people?There are so many parties on the Senate ballot paper. Many have ambiguous or strange names, so it's hard to know exactly who you are voting for, or giving your preferences to.
You can do your own research - the ABC has a Senate Guide. Click your state at the top and you'll get a page with links to all the parties that are running in your state. For example, here is the Queensland list.
But with 25-30 parties running in most states, many people find that too hard and opt to follow their favourite party's how-to-vote card.
What can we doWhile the papers are important we can still minimise our impact - and the impact of others. Depending on your enthusiasm, here are several levels of waste reduction you can do.
Level 1Only take flyers from candidates or parties that you are interested in. I see people take flyers from every party. I guess it seems polite but it's just a waste.
Level 2Put any flyers you take in the recycle bin supplied at the booth, or at home.
Level 3Take care of the flyer(s) you take so it's in good condition to return it to the volunteers. They can use it again.
Level 4After voting, casually take a bunch of used flyers out of the recycle bin at the booth and return them to the volunteers for reuse. The more leftovers they have at the end of the day, the more confident they can be in printing fewer copies next time.
Going onlineParties are starting to put this information online. The Greens one is the most user-friendly. Labor also do it, but it seems to require a fair bit of personal information to be entered.
The Liberal party one is semi-functional. It's hard to tell what parties it suggests to preference. The names of other parties are either removed or too small to read (at least on my screen). I'm hoping this is poor design rather than a deliberate attempt to hide the identity of the party they suggest you give your preferences to.
Again the ABC provides a great resource of all the how-to-vote cards for each state. Here's the Queensland list. For other states click your state at the top of the page. It's handy to see them because each party's suggested preferences give you an idea of what they stand for.
Take heartThe sight of all this paper can be disturbing to the eco-minded. Bear in mind that good parties are now printing on recycled material and most of the paper is recycled afterwards.
Whilst they are very visible, federal elections are only once every three years. The stuff that happens every day of the year (and often out-of-sight) adds up to a far bigger impact than election day. Once the election is over let's get back to fixing those issues.
Try to walk or cycle to the polling booth. It avoids parking problems and positive environmental impact is even greater than what you do regarding flyers.
We've recently switched our electricity provider to Powershop. I'm highly recommending it. Here are 8 reasons why it's a great choice. (9 reasons this April)
Renewable energy makersWhichever electricity retailer I choose, they're going to make a profit from me. I'd prefer that profit to go to a good company. Powershop is owned by Meridian Energy, which also makes renewable energy. That's the kind of company I like to support.
Greenest electricity providerThe Green Electricity Guide ranks electricity companies on their green credentials. This includes emissions from power stations they own, their policy positions on renewable energy and fossil fuels (some companies are actively trying to stop or slow Australia's progress to renewable energy), their deals for solar consumers, and their promotion of energy efficiency.
Powershop tops the list every year and is one of only two companies with a 5-star rating.
Cheaper ElectricityElectricity costs are made up of two parts - the daily 'supply charge' and the 'usage rate'. Both of these are cheaper than our previous provider. Also, their pay-on-time discount applies to both areas. Other providers generally offer their discount only on the usage charge part of the bill.
Extra David-discountYou won't see much advertising for Powershop. Instead of paying for TV ads, they just give the money to customers. What a great way to do business!
If you sign up with my special link you'll get $75 credit and so will I. For this month only (April 2019) they'll make it $100.
Top-upsPowershop also does billing better. You can top-up your credit at any time (like a prepaid phone or a public transport card). You get a discount for doing this. For example you can buy $100 credit for just $85.
Smaller billsPowershop bills monthly rather than quarterly. (Yay!) Apart from making it easier to budget for, it's also less of a shock because each bill is around one-third what you are used to paying. Powershop also lets you know a few days ahead of time, so you have a chance to double-check you have enough credit to cover the bill.
What about my solar panels?Powershop offer 9.5c/kWh for power you export to the grid. If you're on Queensland's Solar Bonus Scheme, the rate is 53.5c/kWh. For other locations check the solar rate for your area.
What do other customers think?Powershop is big in Victoria. Amongst its customers there it rates 5-stars in most categories and out-rates most retailers by quite a margin.
Are there any negatives?I know of only two possible negatives. The greenpower option is slightly more expensive (at least compared to my previous provider). However, as 100% Greenpower customers we found this small extra cost was offset by Powershop's great base prices. Even with our 100% Greenpower the overall cost was practically identical. The sign-on bonus was waaay more than the tiny difference in cost. We changed mostly to support a renewable energy company with better business practice. If you're not a purchaser of Greenpower, then you should have lower cost, and a sign-on bonus.
The only other thing is that your very first bill may be based on estimated usage. Powershop bills monthly, but physical readings are only done quarterly. So your first bill may seem bit low or high. This will even out once they've done a physical reading. Or you can choose to enter your own DIY meter readings via the website.
In summaryIf you're looking for the cheapest deal, Powershop's a great choice.
If you're looking for the greenest electricity company, Powershop's a great choice.
If you'd like more for the solar power you export, Powershop's a great choice.
If you'd like to receive a sign-on bonus, Powershop's a great choice.
Transport19% of emissions Transport emissions are growing because our population is growing and our demand for transport is increasing. Our vehicles are improving but not quickly enough to match our increased use.
We currently have no emission standard on vehicles. In the USA and Europe vehicles are more efficient and cheaper to run.
Some countries have already started phasing out petrol and diesel cars in favour of electric vehicles. Norway is the leader with 31% of new cars being electric. In Australia it's 0.2%.
Even in the UK, there are 29 affordable models of electric cars (under 60,000 AUD). Here in Australia we have 4.
Industry30% of emissions Australia is the world biggest exporter of natural gas (LNG). If the countries that buy this gas are burning it instead of coal, that's good for world emissions. But Australia's emissions are higher because of the energy used to extract, liquefy and transport it.
The industry's rate of improvement in energy use and carbon intensity is at the bottom of world standards. Why?
Australia has a 'baseline' system where big polluters are each given an emissions cap. If they exceed that cap they are penalised - at least in theory. One-third of big polluters have been allowed increase their cap. Emissions from these polluters is up 12% in the last four years.
The rules around changing the cap we changed last month. Bizarrely, they make increasing the pollution cap even easier.
Agriculture15% of emissions Agricultural emissions is usually a hard area to find reductions. There are a lot of methane emissions from livestock. However, Australia's science agency CSIRO has discovered a natural feed-additive that reduces livestock emissions to almost zero.
Electricity34% of emissions Electricity emissions are trending down as renewables replace coal and gas. Transgrid, the network operator in NSW say the last time they connected a coal power station to the grid was 1992. Wind and solar are very affordable now.
French company Neoen started in Australia in 2012, and now have built half their global capacity here. They say a long term goal is needed and that such a goal is not a burden but a certainty for investors.
At the moment 2/3 of Australia's power still comes from coal. These power stations are old and due to close. We need to start soon and do so in an orderly fashion, so that they don't all close at once.
Current PoliciesThe current government buys carbon reductions by giving money to projects that reduce emissions. Sounds good in theory, but there are two issues.
As discussed earlier, companies are being allowed increase their pollution so this "emissions reduction fund" is not reducing emissions, just trying to make up for industry's increase.
Secondly, some projects would still occur without the government funding. So we're spending money on projects that would happen anyway.
In short we're spending money we don't have to spend and emissions aren't reducing.
International commitmentsSo how will we meet our Paris target of a 26% reduction in emissions? The current government is looking to use "credits" from a previous time period where we met our targets.
One of the experts on the documentary said it's like failing your year 12 exams and trying to increase your mark because you got excellent results in year 8.
Also the Paris meeting was held in 2015. Next year all the nations gather again and are expected to improve their targets. The way we're going we can hardly reach the weak targets we currently have.
ConclusionDespite Australia doing so poorly at the moment, there is much hope when we see what is possible. One of the experts has the opinion that "when the debate is over, the economy and people will move forward and take a lot of advantage". I'm looking forward to that.
An obvious everyday action we can take is to recycle - and to buy products made from recycled material. A great example is the company Who Gives A Crap.
This company makes recycled toilet paper, gives free delivery (in metro Australia) and gives 50% of profits to build toilets in developing countries where people are literally dying from diarrhea etc as a result of poor sanitation.
In my home state, Cloncurry had 43 consecutive days over 40°C (104F). That's a state record. In South Australia, Adelaide recorded 46.6°C (116F) - it's hottest ever temperature. Port Augusta took the title for the hottest temperature of the summer, with 49.5°C (121F).
I thought Autumn might bring some cool relief but even this week there's been two days of 36°C or more (97F). In Autumn.
The Australian government repeatedly tries to assure the public that we will meet our greenhouse target. But many are becoming very sceptical. Let's look at why.
What is our targetThe target we set for ourselves, and committed to, is a 26% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 (compared to 2005 emissions). Yes it is a fairly weak target - taking a quarter of a century to do a quarter of the job - but that's a discussion for another day.
Today's question is whether we're doing anywhere near enough to get anywhere near it. Here are the government's own figures on emissions:
It's worth noting that the start of the line is 2005 - the year we are comparing with. To reach our target, we have to get back to that level - and then another 26% below it.
It's been 15 years so far and the only meaningful decrease was in the carbon price period. We'd need to do at least as well as that for the next decade to even get close.
So what are we doing?The section marked "Emission Reduction Fund" seems to have no reductions at all and this is the policy the government wants to stick with (although with less annual funding).