There’s only one reason why I don’t label this newest one filed on March 25, 2024 as a “Sher Edling boilerplate copy lawsuit” – it doesn’t have Sher Edling’s official ‘signature’ on it ..read more

There was much ado about Google’s a few weeks back, prompting about their system “missing the mark.” Well, set their illustration creation ‘intelligence’ aside for a while; is the thing probably dodgey on its text information-generating angle as well ..read more

I’ve covered ‘scholarly homicide paper’ article author Arkush twice before, The Case for Prosecuting Fossil Fuel Companies for Homicide , concerning his one-trick pony sources for his accusation. His paper should be yanked from publication due to being devoid of evidence proving fossil fuel company executives committed climate homicide by carrying out disinformation campaigns. No different – I suggested – than how Masters / PhD degrees should be yanked when they are devoid of the same basic evidence for the same basic accusation. Arkush is back again, and this time he inadvertently handed one ..read more

Chicago sues five giant oil companies straight out of Sher Edling’s San Francisco offices. How do I know it’s another boilerplate copy where Chicago’s own city lawyers very likely had little or no input to offer? Let’s dive into Chicago v BP PLC et al. : (my own PDF download file knew of the harm of “climate change” fifty years ago , if that link ceases to function) which reported fifty years ago (2024-50= ) that the changes in the climate caused by the burning of fossil fuels A climate changing to a cooler one in 1974. A climate changing to a hotter one in 2024. You can’t have it both ways. S ..read more

Basically all of the other “ExxonKnew”-style lawsuits needed long dissections on my part — one needing a 2-part blog post to ultimately point out obvious faults with people who promote this law fare — to detail what fell apart within their accusations about what’s implied to be ‘ employed to carry out disinformation campaigns created by fossil fuel companies .’ When I say this ‘technically’ , filed on December 13, 2023, is easy for me to dissect, I’m not kidding. In fact, in the sheer simplicity of taking apart only underscores the massive problem with the other lawsuit that needed two blog po ..read more

Meanwhile, please do scroll down this page for my completed posts, and return soon to see how the next one coming up will fill in this space. . As I noted within it, it struck me as odd that no major news out had reported about this event. Enviro-activists would have you believe the man was the climate issue’s moral equivalent of Daniel Ellsberg, on bringing public attention to private documents. Ellsberg reported the news of it the No rest for the weary. Also up next my takedowns of the two above less-than-accurate obituaries: In a fit of utterly ill-advised brilliance, the mayor of Chicago s ..read more

Well, this was too easy. A.I., meet brick wall ..read more

Death is final. When ordinary people lived a life filled with dishonest choices apparently for no other reason than personal gain and did nothing to atone for this, they’re now a permanent embarrassment to family members, “someone never to be named” among former associates and former admirers. If they were duped into making supremely unwise choices, well, it’s sad that they were such a dunce. If they chose to be dishonest, their legacy is far worse. When this involves prominent public figures, their legacies become little more than teachable lessons: “you don’t want the public to learn about y ..read more

I’ve already written how Gelbspan is seemingly unable to keep his narratives straight about of ‘industry-paid skeptic climate scientists.’ What he additionally said in the November 1995 C-SPAN interview I covered in Part 1 didn’t clarify any of the problems in his subsequent retellings of his discovery story. It added one more major angle of inconsistency to them all. ” memos – the memos that, from late 1995 to (stay tuned here for more about that latest blunder) – are the literal best that enviro-activists have to accuse skeptic climate scientists of being paid fossil fuel industry money disi ..read more

Meanwhile, please do scroll down this page for my completed posts, and return soon to see how the next one coming up will fill in this space. by the San Francisco Sher Edling law firm to spot what looks like a significant new gift handed on a silver platter not only to the defendants’ law firms, but also to objective journalists and potentially GOP House investigators. No doubt I’ll spot all the same other fatal problems which have plagued the Sher Edling filings ever since 2017. Question will be with this latest pair – what’s up with their new ..read more