On April 15, 2024, in a big win for the continued validity of implied preemption, the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the First Circuit’s preemption-based dismissal of a proposed misbranding class action ..read more

Manufacturers and importers of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (“PFAS”) must report information regarding all PFAS produced or imported since January 1, 2011, by either May 5, 2025, or November 10, 2025 ..read more

In this final installment of our series (see part 1, part 2, and part 3) discussing CPSC’s presence at the 2024 International Consumer Product Health and Safety Organization’s annual symposium, we present two smaller, but important, CPSC updates: Implementation of Reese’s Law and the upcoming mandatory eFiling requirements for importers ..read more

..read more

..read more

..read more

..read more

Dorris v. Danone Waters of America is one of a growing number of lawsuits filed against companies for making claims regarding their carbon footprint ..read more

A recent case in the Northern District of California addresses the use of testing in a false advertising case at the pleading stage, and how specific plaintiffs must be when discussing test results in a complaint.  In Mack v. Edgewell Personal Care Company, the Court held that cursory allegations regarding testing may be insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss, and that specific factual allegations that explain the test results presented and plaintiff’s interpretation of those results are required to meet the plausibility requirement ..read more

..read more