Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
62 FOLLOWERS
Articles cover the latest developments in Bankruptcy Law and discuss the news in a bankruptcy context. Nicholas Gebelt is a Board Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist representing individuals, married couples, and small businesses in Chapters 7, 11, and 13, and with tax debt resolution.
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
1y ago
Some creditors are not entitled to postpetition interest on their claims. For example, general unsecured creditors typically don’t get postpetition interest pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(2).
Other creditors are entitled to postpetition interest.
I. Interest On Unsecured Priority Taxes A. Chapter 11
For example, in Chapter 11 taxing authorities are entitled to postpetition interest on their unsecured priority claims. See, e.g., § 1129(a)(9)(c), IRM 20.2.11.6.1.3(6)., and IRS pub. 908 at pages 26-27.
B. Chapter 13
However, the IRS is ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
1y ago
What is cash collateral? Perhaps the best starting point to understanding the concept is with a relatively common example. Suppose the debtor has a rental property encumbered by a mortgage. The note undoubtedly has an assignment of rents provision. This means that the creditor has a lien against the debtor’s stream of rent payments. That stream of payments belongs to the creditor and is called cash collateral because it serves as partial collateral for the debt — the real property is the other portion of the collateral. As long as the debtor makes the monthl ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
1y ago
This post assumes familiarity with my last three posts (Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3) this multi-part series. Thus, while you can certainly read this post without reading those previous ones, you’ll get more out of it if you read those posts first.
Lien Valuation
We have already discussed motions to value liens. What good are they?
First, if the goal is to strip off a wholly unsecured junior lien, it is important to establish that the junior lien really is wholly unsecured. Therefore, getting a determination of the value of the senior lien(s) and an appraisal of the property is ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
1y ago
This post assumes familiarity with my last post (part 1) of this multi-part series. Thus, while you can certainly read this post without reading that previous one, you’ll get more out of it if you read that post first.
III. Avoidance Of A Partially Or Wholly Unsecured Lien In Chapters 11 And 13
11 U.S.C. § 506 is used to determine the extent to which a claim is secured. Rather than delving into the wording of the statute, let’s informally say that if the value of the collateral is less than the sum of the liens against it, then at least some of the liens are not fully secured ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
1y ago
This post assumes familiarity with my last two posts (Part 1 and Part 2) of this multi-part series. Thus, while you can certainly read this post without reading those previous ones, you’ll get more out of it if you read those posts first.
V. Some Other Issues Associated With Liens
A. Is The Lien Perfected?
Suppose the debtor and all the debt’s assets are in Los Angeles County at the time the creditor records a lien in Orange County against the debtor’s principal residence in Los Angeles. Is the creditor’s claim secured? No. The lien must be recorded in the c ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
1y ago
This is the first of a four part series on lien avoidance. I developed these notes for a presentation I gave to the Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney’s Association, Los Angeles, California.
A lien is a claim or legal right against assets that are typically used as collateral to satisfy a debt. A lien serves to guarantee an underlying obligation. If the underlying obligation is not satisfied, the creditor may can seize the asset that is the subject of the lien. In essence, a lien creates an in rem claim against the assets of a debtor against whom the creditor ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
2y ago
IV. The Constitutional Problem With A § 706(b) Motion
I thank Daniel Press, an attorney practicing in Virginia, Washington, DC, and Maryland, for giving me his notes, which served as an afflatus for some of today’s post.
A. Historical Background 1. The Chapter 13 Context
When Chapter 13 was enacted in 1978, it provided that only an individual could be a Chapter 13 debtor (11 U.S.C. § 109(e)), imposed limitations on the amount of debt a Chapter 13 debtor could have (11 U.S.C. § 109(e)), and — most important for today’s discussion — included postpetition earnings in the bankruptcy estate ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
2y ago
III. Dealing With A Motion To Convert Pursuant To Section 706(b)
This post assumes familiarity with my last two posts (Part 1 and Part 2) of this multi-part series. Thus, while you can certainly read this post without reading those previous ones, you’ll get more out of it if you read those posts first.
A. Oppose Any Motion To Extend The Time To Enter A Discharge
If the Court has already granted a nonconsumer debtor a Chapter 7 discharge, the judge will probably not entertain a motion to convert the Chapter 7 case to one under Chapter 11, pursuant to § 706(b). Therefore, oppose any motion to ex ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
2y ago
In my last post I began to set the stage for a discussion of § 706(b) motions to convert a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case to one under Chapter 11 by considering § 707 motions to dismiss. I noted that § 707(b)(2) only applies to individual cases in which the debtor’s debts are primarily consumer debts.
In today’s post I’ll focus on the question of what kinds of debts are nonconsumer debts because in determining whether a Chapter 7 case should be dismissed, there can be a battle over which debts are nonconsumer and which are consumer.
II. Nonconsumer Debts A. Introduction
The obvious starting point f ..read more
Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog
2y ago
There is an alarming trend facing us, and it is not the latest teen-age fashions. It is the filing of motions pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 706(b), to convert individual nonconsumer Chapter 7 cases to Chapter 11.
Because the topic of § 706(b) motions is a bit complicated, and requires some background information to understand it, my discussion will span a multi-part series of posts. In this first post I’ll set the stage by beginning with the more commonly seen terrain of 11 U.S.C. § 707 motions to dismiss.
I. Section 707 – Dismissal Of An Individual Chapter 7 Case
11 U.S.C. § 707 is the only Code se ..read more