EEOC issues long-awaited enforcement guidance on workplace harassment
Employment Law Watch
by James A. Holt and Veronica Miclot
1w ago
On April 29, 2024 – for the first time in more than twenty years – the EEOC issued its long-awaited updated Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace. The updated guidance, which supersedes the EEOC’s decades-old guidance from the 1980’s and 1990’s, now addresses subjects arising in the modern workplace, including the rise of remote work, the #MeToo movement, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s  decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects workers from discrimination based on their sexual orientation ..read more
Visit website
Unpacking the FTC’s ban on U.S. non-compete agreements: Reviewing the fine print
Employment Law Watch
by Mark S. Goldstein and Veronica Miclot
2w ago
As we posted on Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has at long last issued its final regulatory rule banning virtually all existing and future U.S. non-compete agreements. In this series, we will unpack some of the more nuanced questions surrounding the final rule. Does the final rule bar or invalidate non-compete agreements that ban competition while a worker is still employed by a business? No. The final rule only applies to post-employment competitive activities. And in fact, in many states, employees have common law obligations to not engage in competitive activities during their ..read more
Visit website
Unpacking the FTC’s ban on U.S. non-compete agreements: Impact on private equity and financial institutions
Employment Law Watch
by Mark S. Goldstein, Cindy Schmitt Minniti, Christopher Sheaffer and Ross Williams
2w ago
As we posted yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has at long last issued its final regulatory rule banning virtually all existing and future U.S. non-compete agreements. In this series, we will unpack some of the more nuanced questions surrounding the final rule. Although the series is generally applicable, today’s post is particularly geared toward private equity firms and financial institutions. How does the sale-of-business exception work? One of the exceptions to the final rule is that it does “not apply to a non-compete clause that is entered into by a person pursuant to a bona ..read more
Visit website
U.S. Department of Labor mandates two salary threshold increases for white collar FLSA exemptions and a mechanism for future automatic increases
Employment Law Watch
by Betty S.W. Graumlich, Christopher Bouriat and Noah Oberlander
2w ago
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final regulatory rule that will raise the minimum salary threshold for employees who are classified as “exempt” under the white-collar exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in two steps: first in July 1, 2024, and then again in January 1, 2025. The new rule also creates a mechanism for subsequent automatic increases every three years thereafter based on then-current economic data, with the next increase slated for July 1, 2027.  This new rule comes after the DOL proposed these changes last year in August 2023. U ..read more
Visit website
New York adopts measure to curb frequency of pay lawsuits
Employment Law Watch
by Mark S. Goldstein, Saranne Weimer and Wendy Choi
2w ago
As we detailed in a recent blog post, frequency of pay lawsuits have become a thorn in the proverbial side of New York State employers over the past several years. Over this past weekend, however, Empire State lawmakers passed an amendment to the New York Labor Law (NYLL) that removes the primary incentive for employees and their attorneys to pursue such lawsuits. By way of background, NYLL section 191 requires that employers pay “manual workers” in New York on a weekly basis and not more than seven days in arrears. Specifically, section 191 provides that “[a] manual worker shall be paid weekl ..read more
Visit website
U.S. Supreme Court clarifies standard for job transfer discrimination under Title VII
Employment Law Watch
by Cindy Schmitt Minniti, Alexandra Manfredi and Corrie Buck
3w ago
On Wednesday April 17, 2024, the US Supreme Court in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al. issued a precedential ruling that will likely pave the way for more employee discrimination claims under Title VII. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Title VII prohibits discriminatory job transfers even if they do not result in a “materially significant disadvantage” to the employee. The Court clarified that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII must establish “some harm” with respect to the terms and conditions of employment, but that such harm “need not be signific ..read more
Visit website
EEOC issues final rule on the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
Employment Law Watch
by Cindy Schmitt Minniti, Alexandra Manfredi and Corrie Buck
3w ago
On April 15, 2024, the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued its final rule implementing the federal Pregnant Worker’s Fairness Act (PWFA). The PWFA, which went into effect in June 2023,1 requires covered employers to provide reasonable accommodations for employees’ known limitations relating to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical protections. The PFWA builds on existing pregnancy-related protections and employer obligations under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and many state and local laws. The 400-page final rule provides clarity on how the EEOC will interpre ..read more
Visit website
New York places limitations on employer access to employee social media
Employment Law Watch
by Mark S. Goldstein, Alexandra Manfredi and Victoria Jaus
1M ago
As of March 12, 2024, New York employers are prohibited from requesting or obtaining access to the personal social media accounts of employees and applicants. Specifically, employers are not permitted to require employees or applicants to: (i) disclose their user names, passwords, or log-in information, (ii) access personal accounts in the presence of the employer; or (iii) reproduce any posts, including photos and videos, from personal accounts. In addition, employers may not discharge, discipline, or otherwise penalize an employee or applicant because of their refusal to disclose such inform ..read more
Visit website
Texas federal court blocks enforcement of Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
Employment Law Watch
by Ashley Trinkle, Amanda Brown and Heather Raun
1M ago
On February 27, 2024, U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division blocked enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) against the state of Texas and its divisions and agencies, finding passage of the PWFA violated the U.S. Constitution’s quorum requirement. Below we discuss the terms of the PWFA, its enactment, and the subsequent legal challenge. The PWFA The PWFA requires covered employers1 to provide “reasonable accommodations” for a worker’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless ..read more
Visit website
Between a rock and a hard place – not so much anymore?
Employment Law Watch
by Jan Weißgerber and Christian Schnurrer
1M ago
If an employment relationship is to be terminated unilaterally, employers in Germany often find themselves between a rock and a hard place. The protection against Unfair Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, KSchG), if applicable, sets high thresholds for validly terminating an employment relationship. Due to this, if a notice of termination is issued by the employer, employees in most cases file a claim for protection against unfair dismissal with German labour courts. As German labour courts can only decide whether an issued notice of termination is valid or invalid, a successful claim for ..read more
Visit website

Follow Employment Law Watch on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR