Second dose creates illusory boost
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/Ihatedesire06
11h ago
I am a laymen so please excuse my short comings during our interactions. This graph seems to argue that users/addicts begin to experience illusory highs beginning from the second dose of a drug or substance. By ‘illusory high' I mean that the addict mistakes the relief of the discomfort of the withdrawal from whatever it is - nicotine, cocaine, alcohol, etc. - for 'getting high' again. When the addict relieves the discomfort of withdrawal, this brings him or her back to near normal, and this feeling may be perceived as another high. What the person may have forgotten, however, is that someon ..read more
Visit website
Study unveils a new AI model that was more than 90% successful at determining whether scans of brain activity came from a woman or a man.
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/technofuture8
11h ago
submitted by /u/technofuture8 [visit reddit] [comments ..read more
Visit website
Why are "learning styles" a myth?
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/throaway45621
11h ago
It seems counterintuitive because people often seem to feel that they're an "auditory learner" or "visual learner" or learn best one way or another. Is the issue basically that "learning styles" imply that a person can only learn in one way when in reality we can learn in different ways and might even learn best in different ways depending on the content? Would "learning preferences" be a more accurate term to suggest that people tend to prefer a particular modality of learning but could also learn in different ways if needed and might even benefit from other ways depending on the content? So ..read more
Visit website
What's wrong with IQ tests?
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/TakingNamesFan69
11h ago
Came across someone online saying that multiple neuroscientists they have worked with are against IQ tests and have very rigorous and well crafted arguments as to hey they are pseudoscientific (they didn't give any of the reasons). I'm wondering if this is generally seen as the case, and why would people hold those opinions about IQ tests? submitted by /u/TakingNamesFan69 [visit reddit] [comments ..read more
Visit website
RBANS A vs B Taes
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/Spare-Passenger5076
11h ago
Hi! For the A and B booklets, are the lookup tables at the back the same? submitted by /u/Spare-Passenger5076 [visit reddit] [comments ..read more
Visit website
Weekly education, training, and professional development megathread
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/AutoModerator
3d ago
Hey Everyone, Welcome to the r/Neuropsychology weekly education, training, and professional development megathread. The subreddit gets a large proportion of incoming content dedicated to questions related to the schooling and professional life of neuropsychologists. Most of these questions can be answered by browsing the subreddit function; however, we still get many posts with very specific and individualized questions (often related to coursework, graduate programs, lab research etc.). Often these individualized questions are important...but usually only to the OP given how specific and ind ..read more
Visit website
Hich situation would have a better outcome: 1)thinking its a win or learn situation and not caring about outcome. 2)thinking about beating the opponent and saying if you lose you are a loser and having high stakes 3) not caring at all
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/pomengranateplastic
3d ago
in a sports context submitted by /u/pomengranateplastic [visit reddit] [comments ..read more
Visit website
Is there such a thing as a 'minimum noticeable threshold' for valence and/or arousal? (repost from /askpsychology)
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/dennu9909
3d ago
The only attempt to establish something like this, AFAIK, involved moldy carrot cake. Do we have some approximate threshold rating that corresponds to what the 'average' person might consider affectively arousing (i.e. 5.3/10, 0.24/1)? Is there some consensus on what prevents us from narrowing down such a threshold, like 'subjective emotional sensitivity', 'subjective understanding of the scale', 'all of the above'? Of course, there can't be an exact, absolute number that applies to everyone, but we do have some concepts which people generally agree are upsetting/joyful/scary, etc. Is there a ..read more
Visit website
The ADHD conundrum
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/SciencedYogi
3d ago
I'm a neuroscience student and from way before my academics, I found ADHD to be a very "fishy" diagnosis. Now, I'm thankful for the quashing of mental health stigmas, and they are still out there, but this one doesn't seem to carry any. Im also aware that it can be easy for even professionals and researchers to have difficulty seeing something from a different perspective if it's been their way of thinking/body of knowledge for a long time. I'm looking for some objective, level-headed explanations with evidence to convince me otherwise. Here's my reasoning behind my thought: it's the main "c ..read more
Visit website
Interesting cases you’ve worked on?
Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion
by /u/Ctgroovy
3d ago
Neuropsychologist of reddit, what are some bizzare, interesting, or cool cases you’ve worked on? Was it in a clinic, doing forensics, in a hospital? submitted by /u/Ctgroovy [visit reddit] [comments ..read more
Visit website

Follow Reddit - Neuropsychology: Links, Resources, and Discussion on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR