Gallardo v. Marstiller
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
Petitioner Gianinna Gallardo suffered catastrophic injuries resulting in permanent disability when a truck struck her as she stepped off her Florida school bus. Florida’s Medicaid agency paid $862,688.77 to cover Gallardo’s initial medical expenses, and the agency continues to pay her medical expenses. Gallardo, through her parents, sued the truck’s owner and driver, as well as the Lee County School Board. She sought compensation for past medical expenses, future medical expenses, lost earnings, and other damages. That litigation resulted in a settlement for $800,000, with $35,367.52 expressly ..read more
Visit website
Federal Election Commission v. Cruz
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
During his 2018 Senate reelection campaign and consistent with federal law, see 11 CFR §110.10; 52 U. S. C. §30101(9)(A)(i), appellee Ted Cruz loaned $260,000 to his campaign committee, Ted Cruz for Senate (Committee). To repay these and other campaign debts, campaigns may continue to receive contributions after election day. See 11 CFR §110.1(b)(3)(i). Section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) restricts the use of post-election contributions by limiting the amount that a candidate may be repaid from such funds to $250,000. 52 U. S. C. §30116(j). Rele ..read more
Visit website
Brown v. Davenport
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
Davenport, convicted of first-degree murder following a jury trial where he sat shackled at a table with a “privacy screen,” argued that his conviction should be set aside because the Due Process Clause generally forbids such shackling absent “a special need.” On remand, the trial court conducted a hearing; jurors testified that the shackles had not affected their verdict. The federal district court found habeas relief unwarranted under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. 2254(d). The Sixth Circuit reversed without analyzing the case under AEDPA. The Supreme C ..read more
Visit website
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
Cassirer inherited a Pissaro Impressionist painting. After the Nazis came to power in Germany, she surrendered the painting to obtain an exit visa. She and her grandson, Claude, eventually settled in the United States. The family’s post-war search for the painting was unsuccessful. In the 1990s, the painting was purchased by the Foundation, an entity created and controlled by the Kingdom of Spain. Claude sued the Foundation, invoking the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. 1602, to establish jurisdiction. FSIA provides foreign states and their instrumentalities with immunity fr ..read more
Visit website
United States v. Vaello Madero
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
The U.S. Constitution’s Territory Clause states that Congress may “make  all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory . . .  belonging to the United States.”  In exercising its broad authority,  Congress has maintained different federal tax and benefits programs for  residents of the Territories than for residents of the states. For  example, residents of Puerto Rico are typically exempt from most federal  income, gift, estate, and excise taxes but not every federal benefits  program extends to residents of Puerto Rico. Supplemental Securit ..read more
Visit website
City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
Austin Texas specially regulates signs that advertise things that are not located on the same premises as the sign and signs that direct people to offsite locations (off-premises signs). Its sign code prohibited the construction of new off-premises signs. Grandfathered off-premises signs could remain in their existing locations but could not be altered in ways that increased their nonconformity. On-premises signs were not similarly restricted. Advertisers, denied permits to digitize some billboards, argued that the prohibition against digitizing off-premises signs, but not on-premises signs, v ..read more
Visit website
Arellano v. McDonough
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
Adolfo R. Arellano served honorably in the Navy from November 1977 to October 1981. On June 3, 2011—more than 30 years after he was discharged—he applied for disability benefits on the basis of psychiatric disorders that rendered him 100% disabled. He sought retroactive benefits from the day after his discharge, arguing that the one-year filing deadline to submit disability claims should be extended in his case because his mental illness had prevented him from filing his claim earlier.The VA Regional Office granted his claim, but only from the date the claim was received. The Board of Appeals ..read more
Visit website
Biden v. Texas
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
In 2018, the Trump administration announced the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPPs), under which policy certain noncitizens arriving at the southwest border of the United States were returned to Mexico during their immigration proceedings. Known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, the MPPs faced legal challenges shortly after their enactment, but the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce it. In June 2021, the Biden administration sought to end the policy, but Texas and Missouri challenged that effort, arguing that rescinding the policy violated federal immigration law and tha ..read more
Visit website
West Virginia v. EPA
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
The Trump administration repealed the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which established guidelines for states to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and issued in its place the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which eliminated or deferred the guidelines. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the ACE Rule as arbitrary and capricious. One of the challengers, North American Coal Corporation, challenged the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to so broadly regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The case was decided on June 30, 2022. The Court held that this ca ..read more
Visit website
Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety
Supreme Court Opinions
by SCOTUS Opinions
9M ago
Leroy Torres enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve in 1989. In 1998, he was employed by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) as a trooper, where he served until his deployment to Iraq in 2007. In 2008, he was honorably discharged and sought reemployment by DPS. However, due to a lung condition he acquired in Iraq, Torres requested employment with DPS in a position different from the one he held before. Instead, DPS offered Torres only a “temporary duty offer,” which he declined. Torres sued DPS in 2017, alleging that the agency’s failure to offer him a job that would accommodate his disabil ..read more
Visit website

Follow Supreme Court Opinions on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR