Axiom of choice: Replacing a strong condition with a weaker condition
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by jose diez
3d ago
This set-theory theorem is very easy to prove: (*) if A≈B & C≈D & A∩C=∅ & B∩D=∅ then A∪C≈B∪D It seems intuitive that if one replaces the strong A∩C=∅ & B∩D=∅ condition by the weaker A∩C≈B∩D the implication (**) if A≈B & C≈D & A∩C≈B∪∩D then A∪C≈BD still holds. (**) does not seem to be much... Read more ..read more
Visit website
How to find this equivalent of the material conditional
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by AimaneSN
2w ago
Hi there, It's well known that for two assertions A and B : A → B is equivalent to (nonA or B). The only proof I know of this equivalence relies on the truth table, one just brute forces all the possible combinations of truth values and then notice they're the same every time with A → B and... Read more ..read more
Visit website
What Is the Counterintuitive Probability in the Bag of Balls Problem?
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by Thecla
2w ago
In Aubrey Clayton's book" Bernoulli's Fallacy" which documents the conflict between frequentists and Bayesian interpretations of probability, he describes a problem that was proposed in the 19th century that gives a counterintuitive result. The Problem: "Infer the state of a bag of 3 balls... Read more ..read more
Visit website
Airplane crash probability fallacy
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by Username34
3w ago
https://anxieties.com/self-help-resources/fear-of-flying/how-safe-is-flying/ "In fact, based on this incredible safety record, if you did fly every day of your life, probability indicates that it would take you nineteen thousand years before you would succumb to a fatal accident." The... Read more ..read more
Visit website
Help answer student question about infinity?
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by mishima
1M ago
Hi, my background isn't mathematics but I was wondering how this kind of problem might be approached. They have asked if there was a knot somewhere in an infinitely long rope, would the knot ever be reached if you iterated through the length hand over hand? How could I start to tackle this... Read more ..read more
Visit website
Citation needed: Only multivariate rotationally invariant distribution with iid components is a multivariate normal distribution
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by DrDu
1M ago
I need a citation for the following proposition: Assume a random vector ##X=(X_1, ..., X_n)^T## with iid components ##X_i## and mean 0, then the distribution of ##X## is only invariant with respect to orthogonal transformations, if the distribution of the ##X_i## is a normal distribution. Thank... Read more ..read more
Visit website
Karhunen–Loève theorem expansion random variables
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by cianfa72
1M ago
Hi, in the Karhunen–Loève theorem's statement the random variables in the expansion are given by $$Z_k = \int_a^b X_te_k(t) \: dt$$ ##X_t## is a zero-mean square-integrable stochastic process defined over a probability space ##(\Omega, F, P)## and indexed over a closed and bounded interval... Read more ..read more
Visit website
Time Series Models vs Models Used for Cross-sectional Data
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by fog37
1M ago
Hello, I understand that a dataset that involves time ##T## as a variable and other variables ##Variable1##, ##Variable2##, ##Variable3##, represents a multivariate time-series, i.e. we can plot each variable ##Variable1##, ##Variable2##, ##Variable3## vs time ##T##. When dealing with regular... Read more ..read more
Visit website
Axiom of choice
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by jose diez
1M ago
This set-theory theorem is very easy to prove: (*) if A≈B & C≈D & A∩C=∅ & B∩D=∅ then A∪C≈B∪D It seems intuitive that if one replaces the strong A∩C=∅ & B∩D=∅ condition by the weaker A∩C≈B∩D the implication (**) if A≈B & C≈D & A∩C≈B∪∩D then A∪C≈BD still holds. (**) does not seem to be much... Read more ..read more
Visit website
How to motivate ‘unless’ = ‘if not’, with etymology?
Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics
by scherz0
1M ago
My students still reckon Lande’s 2 motivations for ‘unless’ = ‘if not’ (below) too abstract, formalistic! Thus I need a 3rd simpler, motivation with merely etymology. But I never studied linguistics! How do I 1. use these etymology quotations, to motivate ‘unless’ = ‘if not’? 2. teach... Read more ..read more
Visit website

Follow Physics Forums » Set Theory, Logic, Probability & Statistics on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR