A Tale of Two Statues: Constitutional Issues in Closing a Limited Public Forum
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
4M ago
By: Emily Loftis Satanic Temple v. City of Belle Plaine, Minnesota, No. 21-3079, 2023 WL 5600301 (8th Cir. 2023) I.              INTRODUCTION             The First Amendment of the United States Constitution provides robust protections for the freedom of speech and exercise of religion.[1]  It prevents the government from suppressing unpopular speech or ideas.[2]  When the government acts to restrict speech, it often must face a high level of scr ..read more
Visit website
The Courts’ Rulings Are Final! Or Are They?
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
4M ago
By: Harry Bell P.D.E. v. Juv. Officer, 669 S.W.3d 129, 130 (Mo. 2023) (en banc) I.              INTRODUCTION             If a child is formally accused of misconduct, they are introduced to the juvenile court system.[1]  Courts with jurisdiction over these cases are tasked with administering “care, guidance and control as will conduce to the child’s welfare and the best interests of the state.”[2]  A minor, like in any civil case, may appeal ..read more
Visit website
Eighth Circuit Narrows the Nieves Exception for First Amendment Retaliation Claims
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
4M ago
By: Fabian Reyher Murphy v. Schmitt, 2023 WL 5748752 (8th Cir. 2023) I.              INTRODUCTION             In Murphy v. Schmitt, the Eighth Circuit held that Mason Murphy failed to state a claim for First Amendment retaliation because Officer Michael Schmitt had probable cause to arrest Murphy under Missouri Revised Statute § 300.405.[1]  While both parties agreed that there was probable cause for the arrest, Murphy argued that the N ..read more
Visit website
Burying the Lede: Standard Form Contracts, Non-Compete Bans, and The Federal Trade Commission’s Attempts to Reshape Contract Law
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
4M ago
By: Savanah Seyer* I.              INTRODUCTION             In Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, the term “burying the lede” is defined as “hiding the most important and relevant pieces of a story within other distracting information.”[1]  The perfect example of this concept is the Federal Trade Commission’s “Proposed Non-Compete Ban”.[2]  On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) proposed a rule banning nearly all non-compete agreemen ..read more
Visit website
Conversion, Abandonment and Equity, Oh My! The Argument for Post-Petition Equity As Property of the Bankruptcy Estate
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
4M ago
By: Michael Rotellini* In re Goetz (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2022) I.          Introduction             “There is no place like home.”[1]  This is the iconic line Dorothy says at the end of the film The Wizard of Oz.  A tornado rips through Kansas to start the film, sending Dorothy and her house falling into the magical land of Oz and on the Wicked Witch of the East.[2]  Just like the Wizard of Oz, this Note both starts and ends with the home.  Imagine a ..read more
Visit website
Room in the Inn: How an FDIC-Styled Safety Net Could Provide Respite from the Crypto Winter
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
4M ago
By: Tyler Kraft* I.              INTRODUCTION             Cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency exchanges are currently in the news for all the wrong reasons.[1]  Much of the negative attention is directed toward the executives whose recklessness led to the cryptocurrency market’s so-called crypto winter, along with individual criminal charges.[2]  However, the market’s problems extend to retail investors of cryptocurrency as the exchanges once used ..read more
Visit website
Avoiding Second Injury Fund Insolvency: What Will it Take to Obtain Permanent Total Disability Benefits?
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
9M ago
By: Harry Bell Swafford v. Treasurer of Missouri, 659 S.W.3d 580, 581 (Mo. 2023) (en banc) I.         INTRODUCTION             Historically, employers have been reluctant to hire individuals with preexisting disabilities due to concerns that on-the-job injuries would exacerbate or worsen existing conditions and expose employers to greater financial liability.[1] The Second Injury Fund was created in 1943 to curb this discrimination by employers.[2] An employer may still be liable for d ..read more
Visit website
Missouri Judge Exceeds Authority in Holding Oregon County Clerk in Contempt of Court
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
9M ago
By: Fabian Reyher State ex rel. Grooms v. Privette, 667 S.W.3d 92 (Mo. 2023) (en banc) I.   Introduction             In State ex rel. Grooms v. Privette, the Supreme Court of Missouri held that the presiding judge of the 37th judicial circuit, Judge Steven A.  Privette, exceeded his authority in holding county clerk Betty Grooms in contempt of court for allegedly failing to satisfy the judge’s request for a spreadsheet of criminal case data in Oregon County.[1]  The Court examined the judic ..read more
Visit website
Unreasonable Accommodation or Interpretation: The Eighth Circuit Denies a Landlord Must Accept a Section 8 Voucher Under the Fair Housing Amendments Act
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
9M ago
By: Emily Loftis Klossner v. IADU Table Mound MHP, LLC, 65 F.4th 349 (8th Cir. 2023) I.               Introduction Suellen Klossner rents land at a mobile park owned by IADU Table Mound and managed by Impact MHC Management (“Impact”) in Iowa.[1]  Klossner has disabilities that prevent her from working, including bipolar disorder, neuropathy, fibromyalgia, and agoraphobia.[2]  She is able to survive with assistance from various government programs.[3] As rent has continued to increase quickly at the I ..read more
Visit website
Car Trouble? Breaking Down Missouri’s Expansion of the Castle Doctrine to Vehicles
University of Missouri Law Review Blog
by Kraft, Tyler (MU-Student)
11M ago
By: Lauren E. Nichols* State v. Straughter, 643 S.W.3d 317 (Mo. 2022) (en banc) I.   Introduction             Picture a castle in your mind.  What do you see?  Cinderella’s iconic home?[1]  The dark silhouette of Hogwarts?[2]  A guarded Buckingham Palace?[3]  What about your humble abode?  Or your friend’s car?  In State v. Straughter, the Supreme Court of Missouri held the defendant was entitled to a Castle Doctrine jury instruction while seated in a loaned car.[4]  The result of this inst ..read more
Visit website

Follow University of Missouri Law Review Blog on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR