SCOVT
1 FOLLOWERS
SCOVT blog is a collection of current decisions of the Vermont Supreme Court selected, edited, rewritten, condensed, and digested by Allan R. Keyes, Esq.
SCOVT
1M ago
In Re Burchard Road Petition To Abandon Land Use Permit Denial, 2024 VT 51 (Neighbor, a party to the original act 250 proceeding who lives in New Jersey, did not receive notice of a request to abandon the Act 250 permit because the post office did not deliver a “notice to interested persons” mailed by the district commission to Neighbor’s Vermont street address. As a result, Neighbor did not participate in the district commission proceeding or in the appeal to Environmental Court, which issued a final judgment and later denied Neighbor relief from judgment under Rule 6 ..read more
SCOVT
1M ago
Statev. Ettore, 2024 VT 52 [filed
COHEN, J. In this interlocutory appeal, defendant Eileen Ettore challenges the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress an evidentiary breath-alcohol test, which she filed in both her criminal and civil dockets. We agree with defendant that, under the plain language of 23 V.S.A. §§ 1202(d)(5) and 1203(c), law enforcement must provide a suspect with the results of their first breath test before requiring the suspect to elect whether to take a second test. We reverse the court’s decision and remand for additional proceedings in the criminal c ..read more
SCOVT
1M ago
Driscoll v. Wright Cut and Clean LLC, 2024 VT 49 [August 2, 2024]
EATON, J. Plaintiff Frank Driscoll appeals a civil division order granting judgment as a matter of law on his negligence claim in favor of defendants Benjamin Wright and Wright Cut and Clean, LLC. Based on the evidence plaintiff presented at trial, defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law under Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 50 at the close of plaintiff’s case. The court granted defendants’ motion. On appeal, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting judgment as a matter of law. Because we ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
Berkshire Bank v. Kelly, 2023 VT 2
WAPLES, J. Plaintiff Berkshire Bank filed this action seeking possession of funds in an investment account owned by defendant Thomas Kelly, which defendant purportedly pledged as security for a business loan to his sister Dorothea Kelly. The civil division granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, concluding that plaintiff did not have a valid security interest in the account. We agree and affirm.
The trial court ruled a a security interest never attached under 9A V.S.A. § 9-203(b) and granted defendant's motion for summary jud ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
State v. White, 2023 VT 38
COHEN, J. Defendant appeals from the civil division’s final judgment suspending his driver’s license. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the results of an evidentiary blood-alcohol test because the State did not offer sufficient evidence to demonstrate that defendant’s blood sample was collected and analyzed in compliance with Department of Public Safety (DPS) rules. We conclude that there was an insufficient foundation to allow admission of the test result and therefore reverse and remand for entry of judgment ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
City of Burlington v. Sisters & Brothers Investment Group, LLP, 2023 VT 24
CARROLL, J. Defendant-landowner Sisters & Brothers Investment Group, LLP (SBIG) appeals an environmental-division enforcement order enjoining it from using real property in the City of Burlington, ordering it to address site-improvement deficiencies as required by an agreement executed by a prior owner and the City, and imposing $66,759.22 in fines. We reverse and remand.
The trial court “independently” concluded that SBIG had “failed to ever comply with a 2004 agreement,” and substan ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
Vitalev. Bellows Falls Union High School, 2023 VT 15
EATON, J. Plaintiffs are three sets of parents of schoolchildren who reside in school districts which maintain a public school for at least some grades and do not provide the opportunity for children to attend the public or independent school of their parents’ choice for all grades at the state’s expense. They raise a facial constitutional challenge to Vermont statutes that allow school districts to choose whether to maintain a public school, permit children to attend an out-of-district public school or an independent school at the s ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
Mahmutovic v. Washington County Mental Health Services, Inc., 2023 VT 37
COHEN, J. Claimant Semir Mahmutovic appeals a decision of the Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Labor concluding that claimant’s prior employer was not obligated to reimburse claimant for lost wages under 21 V.S.A. § 640(c), and that the statute was not unconstitutional as applied to claimant. We determine that claimant has conceded that the Commissioner properly interpreted § 640(c), and further conclude that claimant does not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of § 640(c). Therefore, we aff ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
Howard Center v. AFSCME Local 1674, 2023 VT 6
REIBER, C.J. . Employer Howard Center appeals from a trial court order that confirmed an arbitration award in favor of grievant Daniel Peyser and AFSCME Local 1674. Employer asks this Court to adopt manifest disregard" of the law as a basis for setting aside an " arbitration award and to conclude that the arbitrator violated that standard here. We do not decide whether to adopt the manifest-disregard standard because, assuming arguendo it applies, employer fails to show that its requirements are satisfied. We therefore aff ..read more
SCOVT
1y ago
State v. Murphy, 2023 VT 8 .
CARROLL, J. Defendant appeals from his conviction for second-degree murder following a jury trial. He argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal; (2) denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless “ping” of his cell phone; (3) failing to sua sponte give a limiting instruction on evidence of flight; and (4) denying his motion for new trial. We conclude that defendant was not entitled to a judgment of acquittal. We further hold that, while defendant had a legitimate privacy interest in his ..read more