How state abortion policies are impacting future physicians
Journal of Medical Ethics » Abortion
by
3M ago
By Kellen Mermin-Bunnell and Ariana Traub. In June 2022, the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision overruled the federal right to abortion. This decision has long-standing implications not just for reproductive healthcare but for all healthcare in the US. Since the decision, individual states have created their own laws protecting, limiting, or banning abortion ..read more
Visit website
Preservation of Foetus in case of medical termination of Pregnancy of sexual assault victims: An Indian perspective
Journal of Medical Ethics » Abortion
by
6M ago
By Aditi Srivastava. The intersection of laws relating to medical termination of pregnancy and criminal procedure gives rise to complex and critical medico-legal issues. This blog post delves into one such issue, that is, the role of foetal tissue preservation in cases of medical termination of pregnancy involving sexual assault victims, in the Indian context ..read more
Visit website
Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization and doctors’ conscientious commitment to provide abortion care
Journal of Medical Ethics » Abortion
by
1y ago
By Alberto Giubilini, Udo Schuklenk, Francesca Minerva. Julian Savulescu. The reversal of the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling by the US Supreme Court in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization removed the Constitutional protection of women’s right to access abortion services in the US. This decision has resulted in renewed interest in the ..read more
Visit website
Abortion:  a no-go area in teaching medical ethics?  
Journal of Medical Ethics » Abortion
by
1y ago
By Helen Watt The shockwaves emitting from the Supreme Court decision on Dobbs/Roe v. Wade, and the leaked draft opinion before that, have travelled far beyond the US. Those interested in a diverse academy will be intrigued to learn of the recent experience of Ezio Di Nucci, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Copenhagen ..read more
Visit website
The discriminatory consequences of the Dobbs decision
Journal of Medical Ethics » Abortion
by
1y ago
By Claire Gothreau, Joona Räsänen, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the constitutional right to abortion has sparked intense backlash and condemnation from the American public. In the 100 days since the Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that overturned Roe v. Wade, total abortion bans that criminalize the ..read more
Visit website

Follow Journal of Medical Ethics » Abortion on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR