DMV license suspension hearing violated Due Process
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
3d ago
Clarke v. Gordon (Cal. Ct. App., Sept. 12, 2024, No. G062856) 2024 WL 4163081, at *1 Summary: Clarke appeals from the judgment which denied his petition for a writ of mandate which challenged an administrative decision of the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to suspend his driver’s license. An administrative per se (APS) hearing ..read more
Visit website
Discovery under Racial Justice Act requires an ongoing court proceeding
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
1w ago
In re TRAVIS LANELL MONTGOMERY on Habeas Corpus. (Cal. Ct. App., Sept. 6, 2024, No. D083970) 2024 WL 4099744, at *1 Summary: Montgomery appealed an order denying a motion for discovery he made in connection with a postjudgment petition for writ of habeas corpus that sought relief for alleged violations of the California Racial Justice ..read more
Visit website
Prima facie showing of violation of Racial Justice Act in trial court requires reversal of murder conviction
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
2w ago
People v. Howard (Cal. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2024, No. H050156) 2024 WL 3947977, at *1 Summary: Howard shot a man at a nightclub in San Jose. At trial, Howard testified that he acted in self-defense. A jury convicted him of second degree murder. After the jury’s verdict but prior to sentencing, Howard filed a ..read more
Visit website
Police do not need any additional justification to order driver out of the vehicle after lawful traffic stop
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
3w ago
People v. Ramirez (Cal. Ct. App., Aug. 20, 2024, No. G063224) 2024 WL 3869450, at *1 Summary: Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “once a vehicle has been lawfully detained for a traffic violation, a police officer may order the driver to exit the vehicle without any articulable justification.” (People v. Hoyos ..read more
Visit website
Certificate of Probable Cause needed to appeal attorney’s failure to request pretrial mental health diversion
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
1M ago
People v. Moore (Cal. Ct. App., Aug. 9, 2024, No. A167918) 2024 WL 3754712, at *1–2 Summary: Moore pleaded no contest to the charge of stalking in violation of Penal Code section 646.9, subdivision (a).  Moore appealed, challenging his permanent revocation of probation following his admission to a probation violation on the grounds of ineffective ..read more
Visit website
Restitution for victim can be ascertained and imposed even after probation terminated
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
1M ago
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SCOTLANE McCUNE, Defendant and Appellant. (Cal., Aug. 8, 2024, No. S276303) 2024 WL 3736802, at *1–2 Summary: California law mandates that individuals who are convicted of a crime must be ordered to make full restitution to their victims “in every case, regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed.” (Cal ..read more
Visit website
Misuse of tablets issued to CDCR inmates is not computer fraud or grounds to deny access to computers
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
1M ago
In re JOSE OLIVERAS on Habeas Corpus (Cal. Ct. App., Aug. 2, 2024, No. A168677) 2024 WL 3633748 Summary:Oliveras challenged a disciplinary report revoking his computer access and making him ineligible for computer-access-required work assignments or programming because of being found with contraband pornographic images on a tablet device. The Court issued an order to ..read more
Visit website
Social Media Companies are Not Immune to Subpoenas
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
1M ago
Snap, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (Cal. Ct. App., July 23, 2024, No. D083446) 2024 WL 3507024, at *1 Summary: This writ presented  a question of first impression that was raised but not decided by the California Supreme Court in Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court (2020) 10 Cal.5th 329, 267 Cal.Rptr.3d 267 ..read more
Visit website
Dismissal of charges for violation of right to speedy trial based on COVID-19 pandemic
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
2M ago
Mendoza v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco (Cal. Ct. App., June 15, 2024, No. A170135) 2024 WL 3408756, at *1–2 Summary: Mendoza appealed an order denying a motion to dismiss misdemeanor charges against her for violation of the speedy trial statute, Penal Code section 1382. The superior court denied her motion based on the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic which constituted exceptional and extraordinary circumstances warranting a finding of good cause for the delay. The issue of whether there was good cause for the delay was not properly before the Court of Appeal. Th ..read more
Visit website
Unfair to require indigent homeless women to defend both criminal and civil cases for living in city park
San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog
by Uthman Law Office
2M ago
People ex rel. Burns v. Wood (Cal. Ct. App., July 11, 2024, No. G061001) 2024 WL 3370029, at *1–2 Summary: The city of Fountain Valley (the City) sought to prohibit  Nancy Wood, an indigent homeless woman, from residing in the City’s Mile Square Park (the Park), which is near the hospital where she receives treatment for cancer and heart disease. The City had no homeless shelter at that time. Procedural History: The City first filed a criminal complaint against Wood which entitled her to representation by appointed counsel. Wood conceded she was residing in the Park in violation of the Ci ..read more
Visit website

Follow San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR