The Overturning of Chevron Deference: Implications for AI in Medical Research
Healthcare Law Insights
by Ragini A. Acharya and Matthew Deutsch
1w ago
In a landmark decision on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court overturned a 40-year-old legal precedent known as Chevron deference. Established in 1984, Chevron deference mandated that judges defer to federal agencies concerning interpretations of ambiguous laws, as long as those interpretations were reasonable. This doctrine has been a cornerstone of administrative law, significantly impacting the way federal agencies operate and implement regulations. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the 6-3 majority, described the framework as “unworkable,” arguing that it allowed federal agencies to cha ..read more
Visit website
Physician Organizing: Trends and Takeways
Healthcare Law Insights
by Trecia Moore and Mary-Ann Czak
2w ago
In their recent article in Missouri Medicine, Trecia Moore and Mary-Ann Czak discuss the NLRA’s protection of private sector employees’ rights to join unions and note the decline in union membership since the 1950s. Despite this decline, there is a resurgence in union activity and public approval, especially among physicians, driven by changes in employment structures, autonomy issues, and burnout. Learn more in their full article, “Physician Organizing: Trends and Takeaways.” This article appears in Missouri Medicine: The Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association a ..read more
Visit website
What to Learn From DOJ’s First Telehealth-Prescribed Controlled Substances Case
Healthcare Law Insights
by Jonathan Porter
1M ago
On June 13, 2024, the Justice Department announced arrests in what it called the nation’s first criminal case against digital health company executives over allegations that those executives caused illegal prescriptions for controlled substances to be ordered by way of telehealth visits. While the Justice Department has previously brought charges in telehealth cases involving things like orthotic braces or genetic testing, a case against digital health executives involving telehealth-prescribed controlled substances is a first. According to the Justice Department, two executives of a company c ..read more
Visit website
Increasing Colorado Hospital Reimbursement by Paying to the Upper Payment Limit
Healthcare Law Insights
by Baxter Morgan, Ashton Harris and Ragini A. Acharya
2M ago
This post is the first in a series dedicated to Colorado’s Medicaid finance and payment systems, challenges faced by those programs, and opportunities for expansion. The Colorado Healthcare Affordability and Sustainability Enterprise (CHASE) oversees Colorado’s hospital provider tax and the use of those taxes to support Medicaid supplemental payments. CHASE uses the largest portion of those taxes to generate payments targeting the cost shortfalls from treating Medicaid and uninsured patients. Broadly speaking, federal regulations (see 42 C.F.R. §§ 447.272, 447.321) allow each class of institut ..read more
Visit website
HHS Changes HIPAA Privacy Rule to Restrict the Disclosure of Reproductive Health Care Information
Healthcare Law Insights
by Taylor Crossley, Ashton Harris and Noreen Vergara
2M ago
What Are the Changes? On April 26, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued a final rule (the “Final Rule”) along with guidance updating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) regulations at 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164 (the “Privacy Rule”). The Final Rule prohibits the use or disclosure of protected health information (“PHI”) for the purpose of (1) conducting criminal, civil, or administrative investigations into, or (2) imposing criminal, civil, or administrative liability on any person for the mere act of seeking, obtaining, providing ..read more
Visit website
Update on California Health Care: Cost and Market Impact Regulations
Healthcare Law Insights
by Andrew J. Demetriou
2M ago
On May 16, 2024, the California Office of Health Care Affordability (“OHCA”) released proposed emergency regulations to update its existing rules for the reporting of certain health care transactions to OHCA for consideration of whether a Cost and Market Impact Review (“CMIR”) is warranted under the California Health Care Quality and Affordability Act. The current CMIR regulations became effective January 1, 2024, for transactions with a proposed closing date on or after April 1, 2024. The proposed regulations include provisions that will require reporting of transactions that were not covered ..read more
Visit website
Discretion No More: FDA’s New Final Rule Regulating Laboratory Developed Tests
Healthcare Law Insights
by Natasha Sumner
2M ago
On April 29, 2024, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a Final Rule amending regulations to make explicit that in vitro diagnostic products (IVDs) are devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act including when the manufacturer of the IVD is a laboratory. Under the new rule, the FDA will phase out its laboratory developed test (LDT) enforcement discretion policy over a four-year period. The phaseout policy “applies to IVDs that are manufactured and offered as LDTs by laboratories that are certified under CLIA[1] and that meet the regulatory requirements under CLIA to per ..read more
Visit website
Nondiscrimination in Healthcare: HHS’s New Final Rule Under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act
Healthcare Law Insights
by Natasha Sumner
2M ago
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination in healthcare based on a number of characteristics including race, color, national origin, sex, age, and disability. On April 26, 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a Final Rule that according to HHS provides clarity on Section 1557 with a goal of ensuring nondiscriminatory access to care for all, including women, people with disabilities, LGBTQI+ people, people with limited English proficiency (LEP), people of color, and people regardless of age. The first Section 1557 final rule was published in ..read more
Visit website
Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Records: HHS Finalizes Changes to Part 2 Rule
Healthcare Law Insights
by Noreen Vergara and Taylor Crossley
3M ago
On February 8, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) finalized long-awaited modifications to the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Patient Records regulations at 42 C.F.R. Part 2, which requires individuals or entities that receive federal funding and provide SUD treatment to implement additional privacy protections and obtain specific consent before using and disclosing SUD treatment records (see 42 C.F.R. § 2.11). In December 2022, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) recommending modifications to Part 2 ..read more
Visit website
Let’s Make a Deal with DOJ: The Impact of the DOJ’s New Whistleblower Reward Program on Corporate Compliance
Healthcare Law Insights
by Christina Moore and Madison Rector
3M ago
While Monty Hall (or for the current generation, Wayne Brady) was nowhere in sight, it was difficult not to think about the show “Let’s Make a Deal” while sitting in the audience at the American Bar Association’s 39th National Institute on White Collar Crime. During the Institute, one of the featured speakers, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, announced a new DOJ-led whistleblower rewards program. [1] The newly announced program is intended to serve as another incentive to encourage more reports of wrongdoing to the DOJ, but it may leave compliance officers concerned about which of the many ..read more
Visit website

Follow Healthcare Law Insights on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR