MICHIGAN FAMILY LAW 97: The plaintiff’s travels impacted or would impact the child’s permanence and environment.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
10M ago
The plaintiff and the child moved to Illinois without the trial court’s permission and against defendant’s wishes ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN CRIMINAL 21: PPO criminal contempt proceedings exempted from the right to a jury trial.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
11M ago
Defendant argued the Court should recognize the right to a jury trial for criminal contempt proceedings involving PPO violations ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN PROBATE 61: Plaintiffs established that questions of material fact existed whether defendant obtained her status as beneficiary of the IRA through undue influence.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
11M ago
However, a presumption of undue influence arises upon the introduction of evidence that would establish (1) the existence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship between the grantor and a fiduciary, (2) the fiduciary, or an interest represented by the fiduciary, benefits from a transaction, and (3) the fiduciary had an opportunity to influence the grantor’s decision in that transaction ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN FAMILY LAW: DHHS filed its petition in Wayne Circuit Court requesting that the trial court assume jurisdiction over the child.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
11M ago
At the jurisdictional trial, H admitted that she had a substance abuse addiction that somewhat affected her ability to parent her children. The trial court ordered that CKM would remain with M until the custody hearing in a few months ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN FAMILY LAW 95: Trial court denied the defendant’s motion and granted plaintiff $1,250 in attorney fees.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
1y ago
The court recognize that defendant has made great strides in her sobriety. But the Child Custody Act requires courts to focus on the best interest of the children and to provide a stable environment for children that is free of unwarranted custody changes ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN PROBATE 60: The court ruled that the purported marriage between the decedent and petitioner was invalid.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
1y ago
The court ruled that the purported marriage between the decedent and SMM was invalid because the license expired before the wedding ceremony was held, and that acceptance of the completed marriage certificate by the clerk’s office did not create a valid marriage ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN CONTRACTS 23: After defendant did not receive payment, it recorded a claim of lien against plaintiff’s property.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
1y ago
The order also required defendant to deliver the HVAC units and required plaintiff to complete its outstanding obligations under the settlement agreement ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN PROBATE 57: Brother granted permanent guardianship of siblings.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
1y ago
At a multiday hearing to address the extension of the guardianship, the eldest children, the mother’s relatives and friends, and school personnel testified regarding the mother’s care of the children, appellant’s treatment of and interaction with the children, and the eldest siblings’ role in aiding the mother to raise the children ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN DIVORCE 76: Defendant had not exercised his parenting time with the children to warrant the award of any child support amount.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
1y ago
Plaintiff filed a motion for relief from judgment and child support. Plaintiff characterized the failed parenting-time arrangement as newly discovered evidence that negated her child support obligation ..read more
Visit website
MICHIGAN CRIMINAL 20: Respondent found of criminal contempt for violating the PPO.
Aldrich Legal Services Blog
by
1y ago
The trial court conducted the show-cause hearing, which resulted in a finding of criminal contempt for violating the PPO. The trial court sentenced respondent to a 7- day jail term and a $100 fine but suspended the jail term absent further violations of the PPO and directed respondent to have her fingerprints taken ..read more
Visit website

Follow Aldrich Legal Services Blog on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR