Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
28 FOLLOWERS
Conflict Law Centre (CLC) undertakes independent, rigorous, quality and in-depth research in order to enhance understanding of, and promote respect for, international humanitarian law. The Conflict Law Centre is a unique portal at RSIL which is dedicated to the law of armed conflict.
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article discusses the plight of Pakistani detainees at Bagram and the recourse available to them under International Humanitarian Law (‘IHL ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article discusses the phenomenon of urban violence in Pakistan through the philosophical lens of Rousseau’s, Hobbes’s and Locke’s theories of the State ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article discusses the Indian forces’ practice of burning down homes in Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir and the ways in which doing so violates the laws of war ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article sheds light on India and Pakistan’s missing Prisoners of War (POWs) and suggests possible solutions for their return ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article discusses the use of starvation as a method of warfare and its status under IHL and ICL using the case studies of Yemen and South Sudan ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
After over 18 years of war in Afghanistan, the US and the Taliban, the two parties to the conflict i.e. a State and an Insurrectional Movement respectively, concluded the “Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan” (“Doha Accord”) with a view to end the war.[1] This article will engage in a two part inquiry. It will ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article explores the relevance of legal status under IHL and challenges to the established categories of civilians/combatants. The article looks at the legal ramifications of possessing a primary status of combatant or civilian, before analysing the three-category approach adopted by the United States, and the implications of this approach ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
This article explores the relevance of legal status under IHL and challenges to the established categories of civilians/combatants. The article looks at the legal ramifications of possessing a primary status of combatant or civilian, before analysing the three-category approach adopted by the United States, and the implications of this approach ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
2y ago
Another year has passed since India abrogated Article 370 and ended Jammu and Kashmir’s special autonomous status, turning it into an annexed and federally-controlled territory. Since then, the restless region has seen continued human rights violations, demographic changes, and a push to delimit the territory in order to allow Assembly elections to take place. India claims it is providing economic development and promoting democracy in Jammu and Kashmir when in fact it continues to breach international law. India’s attempt to show the valley as one where Kashmiris are finally reaping the divid ..read more
Research Society of International Law » Conflict Law Centre
3y ago
Prior to 2014, “foreign fighters” and “terrorists” represented separate categories of individuals that fell under the jurisdiction of different international law regimes, namely international humanitarian law and the international counter-terrorism regime. However, after the landmark UNSC Resolution 2178 (2014) was passed in response to the influx of third-state fighters in support of ISIL and Al-Qaeda ..read more