The Supreme Court of Canada is wrong to refuse to translate its pre-1970 decisions
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Yan Campagnolo, Vice-Dean and Full Professor, Common Law Section, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa, François Larocque, Full Professor, Research Chair in Language Rights, Faculty of Law | Professeur titulaire, Chaire de recherche Droits et enjeux linguistiques, Faculté de droit, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa, Lawrence David, Part-Time Professor of Law, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
2M ago
Three years after a request made by the Commissioner of Official Languages, the Supreme Court is still refusing to translate its decisions handed down before 1970. Its reasons are not valid ..read more
Visit website
Sexual assault victims give evidence in court, but alleged perpetrators don’t have to. Bruce Lehrmann’s case shows what must change
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra
5M ago
There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law and good sense. Journalist Annabel Crabb wrote the judgement was a “lesson in shades of grey”. What is not said, however, is that a significant factor in this case is that Lehrmann gave evidence. This is a major difference from the aborted criminal prosecution in 2022, in which Lehrmann relied on his right to silence at trial. Lee’s decision in this defamation case is ..read more
Visit website
Sexual assault victims give evidence in court, but alleged perpetrators don’t have to. Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case shows why that needs to change
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra
8M ago
There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law and good sense. Journalist Annabel Crabb wrote the judgement was a “lesson in shades of grey”. What is not said, however, is that a significant factor in this case is that Lehrmann gave evidence. This is a major difference from the aborted criminal prosecution in 2022, in which Lehrmann relied on his right to silence at trial. Lee’s decision in this defamation case is ..read more
Visit website
How Trump’s lawyers would fail my constitutional law class with their Supreme Court brief on criminal immunity
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Wayne Unger, Assistant Professor of Law, Quinnipiac University
9M ago
Donald Trump's Supreme Court brief characterizes historic cases and documents as saying one thing when they say the complete opposite. erhui1979/Digital Vision Vectors/Getty Images Former President Donald Trump claims that the president of the United States is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution. On March 19, 2024, Trump filed his brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith for Trump’s alleged criminal attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Trump argued in the brief that the Supreme Court must dismiss the criminal indictment against him because ..read more
Visit website
New York's $250 million lawsuit against Donald Trump is the beginning, not end, of this case – a tax lawyer explains what's at stake
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Bridget J. Crawford, Professor of Law, Pace University
2y ago
New York Attorney General Letitia James announced a $250 million lawsuit against former president Donald Trump on Sept. 21, 2022 . Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images New York Attorney General Letitia James hit former president Donald Trump with a US$250 million lawsuit on Sept. 21, 2022, citing “staggering” amounts of falsified business information and fraud. The civil lawsuit alleges that Trump, his company – the Trump Organization – and three of his children lied to lenders and insurers about billions of dollars’ worth of assets. This follows a three-year investigation into Trump’s New York-ba ..read more
Visit website
China's new civil code has angered feminists – the Chinese Communist Party is now trying to appease them
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Qi Chen, Senior Lecturer in Criminal Justice and Penology, University of Hertfordshire
3y ago
China’s first ever civil code came into effect on January 1 2021. Replacing a raft of other laws covering issues from marriage, to inheritance, adoption and property, it has binding authority over all civil disputes. A unified civil code has been on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) political agenda since 2014. After ten rounds of open consultation, the National People’s Congress passed the new code in May 2020. Some changes introduced under the civil code reflect grassroots concerns, for example the imposition of liability on people who occupy other passengers’ seats on a train. From Januar ..read more
Visit website
Harsh punishments under Sharia are modern interpretations of an ancient tradition
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Jessica Marglin, Associate Professor of Religion, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences
3y ago
The Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien Mosque, one of the landmarks in Brunei. Brunei recently announced punishing gay sex by stoning offenders to death. AP Photo/Vincent Thian After Brunei introduced death by stoning for homosexuals under its Islamic law, or Sharia, the condemnation from human rights organizations and others was swift. Recently, the country backed down under mounting international pressure, saying it would not carry out executions under the new law. The sultan of Brunei, Hassanal Bolkiah, said, “As evident for more than two decades, we have practiced a de facto moratorium on the exe ..read more
Visit website
Why Australia should face civil lawsuits over soldier misdeeds in Afghanistan
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Tim Matthews, Sessional Academic, Law School, University of Sydney, John Eldridge, Lecturer, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney
3y ago
For the past two years, Paul Brereton, a New South Wales Supreme Court judge and Army Reserve major general, has been conducting an investigation into the conduct of members of the SAS in Afghanistan. While the findings are not yet known, leaks from within the Australian Defence Force (ADF) have suggested that as many as five cases involving unlawful killings have been uncovered. Much of the media commentary surrounding the allegations has centred on the potential criminal prosecution of these alleged offences. But a further legal issue can arise from investigations of this kind – the alleged ..read more
Visit website
South Africa should create a fund to compensate victims of crime
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Bernard Wessels, Lecturer in Private Law, Stellenbosch University
3y ago
South Africa's police face many civil claims by crime victims. Shutterstock/Arisha Ray Singh South Africa is plagued by crime. Violent crime, in particular, has reached epidemic proportions. The country has some of the world’s highest murder, assault and rape rates. So how does – or how should – the law respond to this problem? One option would be to try to prevent crime from taking place in future. But available crime statistics for the last decade suggest that without a major overhaul of policing and the introduction of coordinated social responses to fighting crime this is unlikely to happe ..read more
Visit website
Jail time for South African woman using racist slur sets new precedent
The Conversation » Civil Law
by Penelope Andrews, Dean of Law and Professor, University of Cape Town, Chantelle Feldhaus, Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, North-West University, René Koraan, Senior Lecturer: Criminal Law, North-West University
3y ago
South African court rules that racism is a criminal offence. Shutterstock A South African estate agent Vicky Momberg was caught on video verbally abusing a black policeman. She used the word ‘kaffirs’ repeatedly during her tirade against men who were trying to assist. The word is deeply offensive and considered the most racist in South Africa. The state brought a case of crimen injuria against Momberg and a court has sentenced her to three years in jail (one suspended). This makes her the first person in the country to be jailed for this offence. Thabo Leshilo asked legal experts Penelope Andr ..read more
Visit website

Follow The Conversation » Civil Law on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR