A Christmas Scarol - Competition Tribunal on Rogers-Shaw
We Fight For That
by John Lawford, Ben Klass
1y ago
This episode recounts the dramatic, rapid decision(s) of the Competition Tribunal allowing the merger of Shaw and Rogers (with divestment of Freedom Mobile to Videotron) and why that is weird, appealable, and not a good sign for Canadian wireless and other telecommunications markets. Ben Klass again joins the podcast to give his opinion on the meaning of the decision(s), the appeal, the possible state of the market if the merger proceeds and the weaknesses of Canada's Competition Act and related entities. We close with an update on the CBC-Radio-Canada licence renewal decision that was overtur ..read more
Visit website
Wireless Wind of Change?
We Fight For That
by Simon Lockie, John Lawford
1y ago
We return to look at the Rogers-Shaw deal and possible different solutions than the divestment of Shaw's wireless business to Videotron (Quebecor) - solutions that might include a "maverick" once and future(?) independent wireless competitor, Globalive, best known as the operator of WIND Mobile before it was sold to Shaw and renamed "Freedom Mobile".  Globalive's Simon Lockie joins the podcast to give the inside scoop on a past and future competitor's efforts to start a fourth national wireless company and whether Globalive can acquire Shaw's "Freedom Mobile" assets if Shaw (or Rogers) mu ..read more
Visit website
Bill C-27: Privacy, only worse
We Fight For That
by Yuka Sai, John Lawford
1y ago
We discuss Bill C-27, the Consumer Privacy Protection Act, Personal um, something AI and a tribunal, I think? It does not matter, because the federal government took the last bill ('the other' Bill C-11) to try to replace the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) and MADE IT WORSE.  Wow. The new Bill C-27 guts consumer privacy by simply abolishing it and replacing it with a regime of business use of consumer information. All done without your knowledge and consent. But don't worry, it will all be used by the artificial intelligence (AI) industry to do whate ..read more
Visit website
Black Swan or Red Friday? The Rogers Outage in Context
We Fight For That
by Ben Klass, John Lawford
1y ago
Black swans, red dawns and consumer pawns. I had a longer summary but the Internet ate it. Not typing this again. Just listen ..read more
Visit website
CRTC Decision on CBC N-word Complaint
We Fight For That
by John Lawford, Monica Auer
1y ago
NOTICE TO LISTENERS: THIS EPISODE DISCUSSES A RACIAL SLUR (BUT WE DON'T USE IT) We also note both commenters are racially white and do not pretend to be able to speak to systemic racism, except in general terms and that this episode is not intended, even indirectly, as a collateral attack on the decision's holding. Rather, the CRTC's way of approaching the issue legally and procedurally is what is discussed.  Since the recording, the CBC has claimed to appeal the decision, but is also agreeing to follow the CRTC's expectations (to issue an apology), which is interesting given the discussi ..read more
Visit website
Fixing Bill C-11 for Consumers - Part 2 with Scott Benzie
We Fight For That
by Scott Benzie, John Lawford
1y ago
PIAC discusses Bill C-11 - the "Online Streaming Act" with Scott Benzie of Digital First Canada, a group representing Canadians making user-generated content on social media and related platforms.  We discuss PIAC's proposal of "statIc" versus "dynamic" discoverability as a method to reach a compromise between promotion of Canadian content and user-generated content. We also discuss algorithmic platforms and the present environment for digital creators in Canada as well as several scenarios and their effect on viewers and creators if C-11 passes as is. Part 2 of 2 part special. PIAC remar ..read more
Visit website
Fixing Bill C-11 for Consumers - Part 1
We Fight For That
by John Lawford
2y ago
PIAC discusses, once again, Bill C-11 - the "Online Streaming Act" which is an Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act, to, among other things, require "Internet broadcasters" to be registered under Canadian law and contribute to the creation of "Canadian content" or more simply, "CanCon". We recap PIAC's appearance before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage at the House of Commons (CHPC) and in particular, detail our idea to "fix" C-11, in particular, the user-generated content issue. We argue that the "discoverability" issue and the "exemption" of "YouTubers" and other online content creat ..read more
Visit website
De-Crypting Cryptocurrencies for Consumers
We Fight For That
by Guarav Arora, John Lawford
2y ago
Guarav Arora, University of Ottawa Master's student in the law department and recent tech law intern at PIAC, sits down to describe, and in some cases to defend against the host, cryptocurrencies (and blockchain and distributed ledger technologies in general) and their derivative products like non-fungible tokens (NFTs), stablecoins, initial coin offerings (ICOs), decentralized finance (de-fi), distributed autonomous organizations (DAOs), smart contracts, and the coming metaverse and its relation to finance. We try to see the potential benefits while being realistic about the relative lack of ..read more
Visit website
Clearing Communications Consumers Complaints: CCTS with Howard Maker
We Fight For That
by Howard Maker, John Lawford
2y ago
We interview Howard Maker, Commissioner of the Commission for Complaints for Telecom-television Services (CCTS) about the Canadian ombudsman service that helps Canadians - for free - to resolve their consumer complaints with Internet, wireless (cellphones), home phone and paid TV services.  You never heard of the CCTS? You should get acquainted because they just may get your money back.  But it's not quite that easy, and we ask Howard to describe the challenges of being an independent agency charged with being fair in a notoriously difficult communications market. We also break down ..read more
Visit website
CRTC Bad Series: What's the Hold Up? with Geoff White
We Fight For That
by John Lawford, Geoff White
2y ago
In this first of several podcasts on troubles with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), we concentrate on the CRTC's egregious slowness in both running regulatory proceedings (both broadcasting and telecommunications) and in releasing its decisions after these proceedings - all of which can take years.  During this time, the smaller, or more vulnerable, less powerful parties, such as small competitors, consumers, politicians and the public are disadvantaged while larger players reap the benefit of delay that allows them to exploit their marketplace advan ..read more
Visit website

Follow We Fight For That on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR