Cannabis Rescheduling: HHS Findings and Legal Implications
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Julia Anderson
2M ago
On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) made a groundbreaking recommendation to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) – that cannabis should be rescheduled from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This recommendation was made pursuant to President Biden’s request that the Secretary of HHS and the Attorney General initiate a process to review how cannabis is scheduled under federal law. In recent days, the unredacted 252-page analysis supporting the August recommendation was released pursuant to a Freedom of Information Ac ..read more
Visit website
High Protections on Information Relating to Employees’ Cannabis Use
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Swaja Khanna and Tyler Bernstein
6M ago
On October 7, 2023, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 700 into law, amending the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). SB 700, effective January 1, 2024, expressly prohibits employers from requesting information from job applicants relating to their prior cannabis use. This latest amendment to the FEHA follows prior changes to the law that were enacted last year. As we noted in our initial post, on September 18, 2022, California enacted Assembly Bill 2188 (AB 2188), which established Section 12954, prohibiting employers from penalizing employees or applicants for off-duty ..read more
Visit website
United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc.
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Samantha Young
6M ago
This case addresses whether attorney’s fees are warranted due to an inequitable conduct and conflict of interest defense. Background UCANN filed suit in the District of Colorado in July 2018, accusing Pure Hemp of infringing the ’911 patent, entitled “Cannabis Extracts and Methods of Preparing and Using the Same.” The parties stipulated to the dismissal of this case in 2021. On April 14, 2021, Pure Hemp moved for an award of attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and the district court’s inherent authority. Pure Hemp asserted that (1) UCANN’s prosecuti ..read more
Visit website
Reclassifying Cannabis as a Schedule III Substance – Will the DEA Agree?
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Richard A. Friedman and Nazia Khan
8M ago
On August 29, 2023, less than one year after President Biden’s directive to federal officials, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the U.S. Attorney general, to conduct a review of cannabis’ classification under federal law,[1] HHS submitted a letter to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) recommending a change in cannabis’ classification under the federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”). According to sources citing confirmation from HHS and DEA, HHS’s letter noted that it had completed its analysis of the risks and benefits of cannabis use an ..read more
Visit website
Commercial Cannabis Permit Program and Overlay District Statutorily Exempt Under CEQA Guideline Section 15183
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Whitney Hodges and Barbara Machado*
10M ago
On June 13, 2023, the Second Appellate District affirmed the City of Pomona’s use of a statutory exemption for its Commercial Cannabis Overlay Permit Program under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15183, finding that the program required no additional environmental review. The decision in Lucas v. City of Pomona is noteworthy for the appellate court’s broad interpretation of the statutory exemption,[1] holding that (i) the City’s zoning ordinance, General Plan Update, and environmental impact report (EIR) that do not address “density” may be exempt under CEQA Guid ..read more
Visit website
New York Landlords May Get Stuck with the Bill for Unlicensed Cannabis Sticker Shops
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Ross Honig
11M ago
It is well known that between New York’s enactment of the Marihuana Regulation & Taxation Act (commonly known as the Cannabis Law) on March 31, 2021 and the slower than anticipated adoption of regulations for adult-use cannabis retailers and implementation of the Act there have been few (and in some geographic areas of the state, no) licensed retail dispensaries opened for the sale of adult-use of cannabis and cannabis related products. As a result, there has been a proliferation of unlicensed retailers (often referred to as “sticker shops” because the sale of stickers comes with the ..read more
Visit website
On the Horizon: Broad Employment Protections for Marijuana Users in the District of Columbia
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Maryam Gueye
1y ago
Last summer, the Washington D.C. Council unanimously passed a bill that prohibits employers from refusing to hire, terminating, suspending, failing to promote, demote, or otherwise penalizing any employee who uses marijuana, even if they fail a drug test. In October 2022, the bill, referred to as the D.C. Marijuana Protections Amendment Act of 2022, was signed by Mayor Bowser. The law goes into effect on or after July 13, 2023.[1]  Under the Act, employers are generally prohibited from refusing to hire, firing, or taking other adverse actions against employees for recreational m ..read more
Visit website
Get Your Prop 65 House in Order for the New Year
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Whitney Jones Roy and Jeffrey Parker
1y ago
Companies should regularly assess their Prop 65 compliance. Products, packaging, business relationships, and the rules for compliance are constantly changing. Start 2023 off right with a review of your compliance practices to avoid costly private enforcement actions. What is Prop 65? Prop 65 is a California law that requires California consumers receive warnings regarding the presence of chemicals that cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. The law is highly technical, constantly evolving, and actively enforced by the government and private enforcers. What are the odds that your ..read more
Visit website
Federal Judge in NY Issues Preliminary Injunction to Block Retail Cannabis Licenses on Constitutional Grounds
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Ross Honig and Hannah Zelcer
1y ago
On November 10, 2022, in the matter Variscite NY One, Inc. v. State of New York, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York granted the plaintiff’s a motion for a preliminary injunction against the State of New York (“NYS”), the New York State Office of Cannabis Management (“OCM”), and the Executive Officer of the OCM, Christopher Alexander issuing any cannabis licenses under NYS’s conditional adult-use retail dispensary (“CAURD”) application program in 5 of the state’s 14 geographic regions. Background In a prior article, we covered the New York Seeding Opportunity ..read more
Visit website
Federal Cannabis Banking Reform: What Happened?
Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog
by Whitney Hodges
1y ago
This article was originally published in the November/December issue of ELFA’s Equipment Leasing & Finance magazine. In mid-July 2022, the United States House of Representatives passed provisions that would allow legitimate cannabis-related businesses to access federally regulated financial services. This marks the seventh time the House has approved a version of the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. The original version of federal cannabis banking reform was introduced nine years ago by Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo). The passage of the SAFE Banking Act, either as stand-al ..read more
Visit website

Follow Sheppard Mullin’s Cannabis Law Blog on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR