Decoding SEBI’s Tech Arsenal for Insider Trading: Structured Digital Database (Part I)
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Yash J. Ashar, Rutu Gandhi and Pratiksha Arekar
5M ago
Ever since the introduction of framework for prevention of insider trading (“PIT”), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), as the primary regulator of securities markets has consistently been sharpening its tools to effectively discharge its duty of ensuring market integrity, curbing malpractices and safeguarding interests of investors. One such tool named the ‘structured digital database’ (“SDD”) was added by SEBI in its mix of digital surveillance aids, through the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018 with effect from April 1, 2019. Thus, it has ..read more
Visit website
“Duly Noted”: Notice period for subsequent sale notice under Rule 8 and 9 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 relaxed by the Supreme Court
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Bishwajit Dubey, Srideepa Bhattacharyya and Aparajito Sen
2y ago
Introduction A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, in S. Karthik & Ors. v. N. Subhash Chand Jain & Ors.[1](“S. Karthik”), recently relaxed the mandatory pre-requisites prescribed for sale of mortgaged assets under the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (“The SI Rules”), under certain circumstances. It was held that when a sale notice under the SI Rules does not result in a sale due to reasons entirely attributable to the borrower, then the lender need not wait another 30 days before selling the mortgaged assets through a subsequent sale notice. This decision assumes signif ..read more
Visit website
Post-IPO financial results – when to disclose
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Yash J. Ashar, Gokul Rajan, Devaki Mankad and Janhavi Seksaria
2y ago
Under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, as amended (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), listed companies are required to submit their financial results within 45 days of end of each quarter, other than the last quarter of a financial year where they have 60 days. Due to such requirement, newly-listed companies now face an interesting challenge immediately post listing. These companies are being guided by the stock exchanges to release their latest quarterly results within 45 days of the end of such quarter (or 60 days when ..read more
Visit website
Major Impetus to IPO Rush
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Yash J. Ashar, Gokul Rajan and Devaki Mankad
2y ago
Despite the challenging times, the Indian capital markets are hitting all-time highs on a daily basis and have been flooded with capital. This has seen a rush of equity offerings over the last 12 months including record filings for draft documents over the last few months. In their continuous efforts to make India exchanges more competitive, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) has notified the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2021 (“ICDR Amendment”). Pursuant to the ICDR Amendment, SEBI has rev ..read more
Visit website
Extra-territorial application of India’s securities law – Has SEBI cast its net too wide?
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Bharat Vasani, Esha Himadri and Varun Kannan
2y ago
“If a connection exists, it is for the Legislature to decide how far it should go in the exercise of its powers.[1]” Introduction The territorial application of laws made by Parliament is enshrined in Article 245 of the Constitution of India (“Constitution”). The universal presumption that laws made by a country are limited to its own territorial borders, is provided under Article 245(1) of the Constitution, which provides that “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India.” However, Article 245(2) of the Consti ..read more
Visit website
What is Front Running? – A Q&A Piece in Light of the SEBI Order Against Dealers of Reliance Securities Ltd.
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Rohan Banerjee and Khyati G
3y ago
Introduction In an interim ex-parte order last month against the dealers of Reliance Securities Limited (“RSL”) and other related entities (“RSL Order”)[1], SEBI prima facie held over two dozen entities to have engaged in front running the trades of Tata Absolute Return Fund, a scheme of Tata AIF (“Big Client”). During its preliminary examination, SEBI meticulously pieced together several bits of available circumstantial evidence and alleged an archetypal scheme of front running purportedly employed by three senior dealers (“Dealers”) at RSL, in nexus with various related entities. The RSL Or ..read more
Visit website
Continuous Disclosure Obligations: Learnings for the Indian Securities Market
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Yash J. Ashar, S Vivek and Siddhant Sattur
4y ago
  A regulatory environment that supports robust secondary market disclosures is critical for a well-functioning securities market. Ongoing disclosures by listed companies are being increasingly scrutinised by regulators, stock exchanges and market participants to see if timely and accurate disclosures of all material information are being made by the listed entity. Accordingly, it is important for companies to ensure that developments in their businesses translate to appropriate regulatory disclosures. A recent example of the importance of secondary market disclosure is the Facebook case ..read more
Visit website
Innovation in the Sands of Time: A Critique of SEBI’s Framework for Innovation Sandbox
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Avinash Umapathy and Ramya Chandrasekhar
4y ago
Amidst the fast-paced growth of the fintech industry in India, financial regulators in the country have been swift to recognise each such development and keep pace with the market. One particularly interesting development is the global adoption of regulatory sandboxes. From 2016, a range of committees constituted by different financial regulators began to advocate adoption of regulatory sandboxes, drawing from success stories in other jurisdictions.[1] But 2019 marks a significant moment, as three of India’s prominent financial regulators have rolled-out either draft or final frameworks on re ..read more
Visit website
Amendments to the Delisting Regulations – A Welcome Move
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Sourav Kanti De Biswas and Vidya Sunderam
4y ago
  Pursuant to the discussion paper on delisting of equity shares floated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on July 26, 2018, SEBI has recently amended the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2009 (Delisting Regulations) and has accordingly notified the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Delisting of Equity Shares) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2018 (Amended Delisting Regulations) on November 14, 2018. The aim of the amendment is to plug loopholes in the delisting process considering the interests of the promoters/acqu ..read more
Visit website
Insider Trading: Hindustan Lever Limited v. SEBI
India Corporate Law » Securities Law
by Ankoosh Mehta and CAM Disputes Team
4y ago
Image credit: Scroll.in, September 26, 2017 This is the second piece in our series entitled “Those Were the Days”, which is published monthly. We hope you enjoy reading this as much as we have enjoyed putting this together. This post deals with Securities Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) interpretation of the term “Unpublished Price Sensitive Information” (UPSI) arising from the alleged insider trading by Hindustan Lever Limited (now Hindustan Unilever Limited) (HLL) in its purchase of shares of Brooke Bond Lipton India Limited (BBLIL). While the subject SEBI order employed provisions of the ..read more
Visit website

Follow India Corporate Law » Securities Law on FeedSpot

Continue with Google
Continue with Apple
OR