The recent decision from a conservative-leaning Supreme Court to find that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes protection based on sex for LGBT+ individuals in the context of employment was a surprising one. This case is not the end of the fight for LGBT+ rights. It is a milestone along the way. Justice Gorsuch, who wrote the majority opinion, specifically limited the decision to not providing protections outside of the realm of employment, “we do not purport to address bathrooms, locker rooms, or anything else of the kind.” He also opened the door to religious objections and religious groun ..read more

I compiled a list of the blogs I think you would be most interested in as readers. You will find them divided by subject matter and, described in their own words. I hope you enjoy. I try to write my blog from as apolitical a stance as I can on the legal facts and aspects of the situation. Some of these blogs have a distinct political leaning and it is important to note that their opinions are not the opinions held by the writer of this blog. Legally Minded Above The Law – A Legal Web Site – News, Insights, and Opinions on Law Firms, Lawyers, Law School, Law Suits, Judges and Courts. SCOTUS ..read more

The right to “life, liberty, and happiness”[1] is a concept as old as the Declaration of Independence and one that every American holds dear. However, the right to life does not exist within the law. The Coronavirus has led many to question the efficacy of the Federal government’s response to the virus and further to question whether they are prioritizing life or economy. Many would assume that the government is under an obligation to protect their lives during this time. This article aims to debunk that theory, at least from a legal standpoint. There is no Constitutional right to life. The De ..read more

‘Justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.’ Lord Hewert, R v Sussex Justices Today, May 4th, 2020, for the first time, the Supreme Court of the United States broadcast oral argument in a case involving Booking.com and modern trademark protections. This change comes as the Supreme Court cannot meet the hear oral argument in person during the Coronavirus pandemic. The above quote is from a British case, but the quote is known in the United States as a fundamental principle of the importance of justice being accessible to the public. The Supreme ..read more

The extent to which the government can limit our freedom of movement has been called into sharp relief by the Coronavirus and the swell of Social Distancing and Stay-At-Home orders. Read on to find out where these powers originate and who controls your most controversial rights. The Attorney General has recently made it clear that the Department of Justice may intervene in cases where a citizen is suing their state for the easing of Quarantine or Stay-At-Home Orders by filing a Statement of Interest that supports the Plaintiff against the state. This creates a tension between the Federal and S ..read more

One of a parent’s greatest fears, losing their children. Essential workers are finding their child custody put at risk by their participation in the fight against the Coronavirus. A publicly shared via social media, court order from the Sac and Fox Nation District Court in Oklahoma, reveals that a judge has taken judicial notice of the Coronavirus as a pandemic with no current vaccination. The petitioner has filed documents with the court stating that the respondent has “alleged proximity to Coronavirus”. The order also mentions that one of the children has a pre-existing health condition and ..read more